And the Democrat Debate Winner is!!!!!

[JimL]

What hasn't been explained is the reason for a prosecutor with more than the usual desire to find an offence, being forced in the end to admit that he couldn't find any offence that would be demonstrable to a grand jury.

Over 1000 former and current federal prosecutors signed a letter in reference to the Mueller report stating that if it had been any one other than the President he would have been indicted. The Special Prosecutor, because of DOJ guidelines, could not indict a sitting President and therefore he conducted the investigation and left it for Congress to Impeach which is basically a Jury trial and the only way to adjudicate charges against the President. Besides that, anyone with half a brain could see the possible criminal conspiracy and the definite obstruction of justice of both the Special Prosecutor's as well as the Congressional Investigations.

[tabibito]

Over 1000 former and current federal prosecutors signed a letter in reference to the Mueller report stating that if it had been any one other than the President he would have been indicted. The Special Prosecutor, because of DOJ guidelines, could not indict a sitting President and therefore he conducted the investigation and left it for Congress to Impeach which is basically a Jury trial and the only way to adjudicate charges against the President. Besides that, anyone with half a brain could see the possible criminal conspiracy and the definite obstruction of justice of both the Special Prosecutor's as well as the Congressional Investigations.

If it was as open and shut as your 1000+ claim, congress would have begun impeachment proceedings long since. Either your 1000+ are wrong, or congress is participating in this conspiracy of yours.

[One Bad Pig]

Over 1000 former and current federal prosecutors signed a letter in reference to the Mueller report stating that if it had been any one other than the President he would have been indicted. The Special Prosecutor, because of DOJ guidelines, could not indict a sitting President and therefore he conducted the investigation and left it for Congress to Impeach which is basically a Jury trial and the only way to adjudicate charges against the President. Besides that, anyone with half a brain could see the possible criminal conspiracy and the definite obstruction of justice of both the Special Prosecutor's as well as the Congressional Investigations.

Yes, "the possible criminal conspiracy and the definite obstruction of justice of both the Special Prosecutor's as well as the Congressional Investigations" is fairly evident to see. If only we could hold them to account.

[JimL]

If it was as open and shut as your 1000+ claim, congress would have begun impeachment proceedings long since. Either your 1000+ are wrong, or congress is participating in this conspiracy of yours.

That's ridiculous. There are many reasons for the House not to initiate Impeachment Hearings and the reason for not doing so certainly has nothing to do with them not being aware of the much existing evidence against Trump and his Administration. Personally I think those reasons are wrong headed at this point, but they are their reasons.

I don't think that I'll question whether or not 1000+ former and current federal prosecutors know what they're talking about. And, the idea that Congress is participating in some conspiracy is only for nut case conspiracy theorist to ponder.

[JimL]

Yes, "the possible criminal conspiracy and the definite obstruction of justice of both the Special Prosecutor's as well as the Congressional Investigations" is fairly evident to see. If only we could hold them to account.

You're beginning to sound like a nut case there, OBP. Is it possible that your bias was able to turn the real world upside down in your brain.

[One Bad Pig]

You're beginning to sound like a nut case there, OBP. Is it possible that your bias was able to turn the real world upside down in your brain.

Coming from you, that's a compliment. If YOU think I'm crazy and upside down, odds are pretty good I'm on the right track.

[Teallaura]

Over 1000 former and current federal prosecutors signed a letter in reference to the Mueller report stating that if it had been any one other than the President he would have been indicted. The Special Prosecutor, because of DOJ guidelines, could not indict a sitting President and therefore he conducted the investigation and left it for Congress to Impeach which is basically a Jury trial and the only way to adjudicate charges against the President. Besides that, anyone with half a brain could see the possible criminal conspiracy and the definite obstruction of justice of both the Special Prosecutor's as well as the Congressional Investigations.

Former, not current - and that number isn't particularly large, given the number of Fed prosecutors.It's an online signature - with no mention of party affiliation. It appears to still be active but that makes the number of signatories even less impressive since it began May 6.

[Cow Poke]

That's ridiculous. There are many reasons for the House not to initiate Impeachment Hearings and the reason for not doing so certainly has nothing to do with them not being aware of the much existing evidence against Trump and his Administration. Personally I think those reasons are wrong headed at this point, but they are their reasons.

I don't think that I'll question whether or not 1000+ former and current federal prosecutors know what they're talking about. And, the idea that Congress is participating in some conspiracy is only for nut case conspiracy theorist to ponder.

Jimmy, you actually typed some complete sentences with some proper contractions and several proper uses of their/there/they're, and with only minor errors. Are you smokin' something?

[rogue06]

You're beginning to sound like a nut case

Coming from the collusion delusion boy:

Iron_E_Meter.gif

irony meter1.jpg

irony meter2.jpg

Irony Meter3.gif

irony meter4.jpg

IronyMeter1.gif

IronyMeter2.gif

IronyMeter6.gif

IronyMeter4.gif

And considering that this is how you "research" your claims:

JimL preparing-to-post.gif

[JimL]

Jimmy, you actually typed some complete sentences with some proper contractions and several proper uses of their/there/they're, and with only minor errors. Are you smokin' something?

I wish!

[Cow Poke]

...Are you smokin' something?

I wish!

And, there you have it, folks!