Announcement

Collapse

Deeper Waters Forum Guidelines

Notice – The ministries featured in this section of TheologyWeb are guests of this site and in some cases not bargaining for the rough and tumble world of debate forums, though sometimes they are. Additionally, this area is frequented and highlighted for guests who also very often are not acclimated to debate fora. As such, the rules of conduct here will be more strict than in the general forum. This will be something within the discretion of the Moderators and the Ministry Representative, but we simply ask that you conduct yourselves in a manner considerate of the fact that these ministries are our invited guests. You can always feel free to start a related thread in general forum without such extra restrictions. Thank you.

Deeper Waters is founded on the belief that the Christian community has long been in the shallow end of Christianity while there are treasures of the deep waiting to be discovered. Too many in the shallow end are not prepared when they go out beyond those waters and are quickly devoured by sharks. We wish to aid Christians to equip them to navigate the deeper waters of the ocean of truth and come up with treasure in the end.

We also wish to give special aid to those often neglected, that is, the disabled community. This is especially so since our founders are both on the autism spectrum and have a special desire to reach those on that spectrum. While they are a special emphasis, we seek to help others with any disability realize that God can use them and that they are as the Psalmist says, fearfully and wonderfully made.

General TheologyWeb forum rules: here.
See more
See less

Atheist Incredulity

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Atheist Incredulity

    Are atheists really interested in evidence?

    Link

    -----

    Are many atheists really people of reason? Let’s plunge into the Deeper Waters and find out.

    Normally if you encounter an atheist, the reigning battle cry is that of evidence. I’m not at all denouncing that request. That’s a fine request to make. What I am skeptical about is the fact that evidence is really wanted.

    My problem with this is that there is many times a double-standard. Consider some statements that you can see. Richard Dawkins was interviewed by Peter Boghossian and said he had become convinced that most anything that could be seen as done by God could also be done by aliens so when asked what would convince him God exists, the answer is now nothing.

    Boghossian doesn’t fare much better. In his book A Manual for Creating Atheists, he says that if he went outside and all the stars at night spelled out “I am God. Believe in me”, well, that might be suggestive. Of course, we could all be experiencing a mass delusion.

    Or consider this golden piece from Jerry Coyne.

    “The following (and admittedly contorted) scenario would give me tentative evidence for Christianity. Suppose that a bright light appeared in the heavens, and, supported by winged angels, a being clad in a white robe and sandals descended onto my campus from the sky, accompanied by a pack of apostles bearing the names given in the Bible. Loud heavenly music, with the blaring of trumpets, is heard everywhere. The robed being, who identifies himself as Jesus, repairs to the nearby university hospital and instantly heals many severely afflicted people, including amputees. After a while Jesus and his minions, supported by angels ascend back into the sky with another chorus of music. The heavens swiftly darken, there are flashes of lightning and peals of thunder, and in an instant the sky is clear.

    If this were all witnessed by others and documented by video, and if the healings were unexplainable but supported by testimony from multiple doctors, and if all the apparitions and events conformed to Christian theology—then I’d have to start thinking seriously about the truth of Christianity.” Faith vs. Fact p. 118-119

    Note that he says that this is contorted and tentative. This could just begin to suggest something. Note also that these requests are for an experience. That means that you can present all the objective evidence you want and it doesn’t matter. If you talked about your experience, it would be invalid, and yet experience is all that will convince them. Thus, unless you can command God, which you cannot, you will not convince them.

    Now let’s see how they handle other situations.

    Remember a few years ago when this manuscript was found claiming that Jesus had a wife? Did we know who wrote it? No. Did we know when? What we had was a few centuries after the event. Did we have any context? No. None of this stopped atheists everywhere from proclaiming that a cover-up had taken place and the truth was now out there.

    Now go to the Gospels and what do we get? “They’re anonymous!” even though we have better sources on who wrote them than we did on this other finding. They’re decades later, even though that’s not much in the ancient world and it beats centuries later. We also have the entire works themselves. I haven’t even got to the positive evidence for the Gospels. At this point, there’s a double-standard going on.

    A few days ago I saw someone share in a group a story that was first published years ago. It was about Joseph Atwill and his book Caesar’s Messiah. For those who don’t know, this is the guy that even Richard Carrier calls a crank with his hypothesis that Christianity was invented by the Romans to control the poor and so Jesus never existed. This atheist who shared it was so happy a Bible scholar was finally showing the truth.

    Except that not even atheist Bible scholars took Atwill seriously. These are the same atheists that will commit ritual suicide before they dare read anything by a Christian scholar, but when someone they don’t even know agrees with them, he’s a scholar. For many atheists, it seems like the reasoning goes like this.

    Does the claim make Christianity look bad or argue that it is false?
    Then the claim is entirely true!
    Does the claim defend Christianity or leave it looking good or at least neutral?
    Then the claim is entirely false!

    No research is needed.

    Jesus mythicism is a fine example of this. The people who decry creationists for going against the reigning opinion of biologists and other scientists will happily embrace this fringe movement and base all their hope on Richard Carrier. If anything, when I see atheists argue like this, it really convinces me they don’t know what they’re talking about.

    Memes are one of the biggest culprits in this area. Atheists will often post memes meant to be one-liners or something close to show Christianity is nonsense. Normally, these are laden with hideously bad argumentation and a lack of understanding of the claims of Christianity. Memes can be fine illustrations if you have been establishing a point, but please don’t make them the centerpiece of your argument.

    Please note I am not saying we Christians can never be just as bad on our own end. What I am claiming is that the party of evidence drops the idea of evidence when it suits them. I know a number of atheists that are not like this, but there are too many that are and if atheists want to be taken seriously, they should try to silence those that are like this. I think of Tim O’Neill who runs the website, History for Atheists, who is doing great work in this regard as an atheist.

    And also, I don’t really try to persuade these people that Christianity is true. They’re not really listening. My debate is for the audience who is watching.

    In Christ,
    Nick Peters
    Last edited by Apologiaphoenix; 07-02-2019, 08:40 AM.

  • #2
    I don't think they would believe even if Jesus surprised one of them and something happened to prove He was not your regular ordinary human. They'd try to claim He was just an alien or some finite extradimensional entity or something....
    If it weren't for the Resurrection of Jesus, we'd all be in DEEP TROUBLE!

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Christianbookworm View Post
      I don't think they would believe even if Jesus surprised one of them and something happened to prove He was not your regular ordinary human. They'd try to claim He was just an alien or some finite extradimensional entity or something....
      That's true for some but their have been numerous conversions over the years to demonstrate it isn't true for all.

      I'm always still in trouble again

      "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
      "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
      "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

      Comment


      • #4
        The sad part is that some of them WILL see Christ descending in clouds, and it will be too late for them.


        Securely anchored to the Rock amid every storm of trial, testing or tribulation.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Apologiaphoenix View Post


          Jesus mythicism is a fine example of this. The people who decry creationists for going against the reigning opinion of biologists and other scientists will happily embrace this fringe movement and base all their hope on Richard Carrier. If anything, when I see atheists argue like this, it really convinces me they don’t know what they’re talking about.
          That. The supreme arrogance and conceit you see by those like that gives a whole new meaning to insufferable.

          I'm always still in trouble again

          "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
          "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
          "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

          Comment


          • #6
            "Richard Dawkins was interviewed by Peter Boghossian and said he had become convinced that most anything that could be seen as done by God could also be done by evidence"

            I think you put the wrong word at the end?

            Comment


            • #7
              Fixed to be aliens.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
                That's true for some but their have been numerous conversions over the years to demonstrate it isn't true for all.
                Stop it. I know what you're doing.
                The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Apologiaphoenix View Post
                  Fixed to be aliens.
                  So, still a super intelligence and power that we can't understand?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    An all powerful, all knowing eniity that exists outside our universe? Sounds like God to me...
                    If it weren't for the Resurrection of Jesus, we'd all be in DEEP TROUBLE!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Apologiaphoenix View Post
                      Are atheists really interested in evidence?

                      Link

                      Jesus mythicism is a fine example of this. The people who decry creationists for going against the reigning opinion of biologists and other scientists will happily embrace this fringe movement and base all their hope on Richard Carrier. If anything, when I see atheists argue like this, it really convinces me they don’t know what they’re talking about.

                      In Christ,
                      Nick Peters
                      Off-topic, but is Christ myth theory supported by ANY serious historians and academics? I mean, even ONE?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Seeker View Post
                        Off-topic, but is Christ myth theory supported by ANY serious historians and academics? I mean, even ONE?
                        I'm not aware of any. Even skeptics like Bart Ehrman are dismissive of the theory.
                        Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. – St. John Chrysostom

                        Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
                        sigpic
                        I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Apologiaphoenix View Post
                          Are atheists really interested in evidence?

                          Link

                          -----

                          Are many atheists really people of reason? LetÂ’s plunge into the Deeper Waters and find out.

                          Normally if you encounter an atheist, the reigning battle cry is that of evidence. IÂ’m not at all denouncing that request. ThatÂ’s a fine request to make. What I am skeptical about is the fact that evidence is really wanted.

                          My problem with this is that there is many times a double-standard. Consider some statements that you can see. Richard Dawkins was interviewed by Peter Boghossian and said he had become convinced that most anything that could be seen as done by God could also be done by aliens so when asked what would convince him God exists, the answer is now nothing.

                          Boghossian doesn’t fare much better. In his book A Manual for Creating Atheists, he says that if he went outside and all the stars at night spelled out “I am God. Believe in me”, well, that might be suggestive. Of course, we could all be experiencing a mass delusion.

                          Or consider this golden piece from Jerry Coyne.

                          “The following (and admittedly contorted) scenario would give me tentative evidence for Christianity. Suppose that a bright light appeared in the heavens, and, supported by winged angels, a being clad in a white robe and sandals descended onto my campus from the sky, accompanied by a pack of apostles bearing the names given in the Bible. Loud heavenly music, with the blaring of trumpets, is heard everywhere. The robed being, who identifies himself as Jesus, repairs to the nearby university hospital and instantly heals many severely afflicted people, including amputees. After a while Jesus and his minions, supported by angels ascend back into the sky with another chorus of music. The heavens swiftly darken, there are flashes of lightning and peals of thunder, and in an instant the sky is clear.

                          If this were all witnessed by others and documented by video, and if the healings were unexplainable but supported by testimony from multiple doctors, and if all the apparitions and events conformed to Christian theology—then I’d have to start thinking seriously about the truth of Christianity.” Faith vs. Fact p. 118-119

                          Note that he says that this is contorted and tentative. This could just begin to suggest something. Note also that these requests are for an experience. That means that you can present all the objective evidence you want and it doesnÂ’t matter. If you talked about your experience, it would be invalid, and yet experience is all that will convince them. Thus, unless you can command God, which you cannot, you will not convince them.

                          Now letÂ’s see how they handle other situations.

                          Remember a few years ago when this manuscript was found claiming that Jesus had a wife? Did we know who wrote it? No. Did we know when? What we had was a few centuries after the event. Did we have any context? No. None of this stopped atheists everywhere from proclaiming that a cover-up had taken place and the truth was now out there.

                          Now go to the Gospels and what do we get? “They’re anonymous!” even though we have better sources on who wrote them than we did on this other finding. They’re decades later, even though that’s not much in the ancient world and it beats centuries later. We also have the entire works themselves. I haven’t even got to the positive evidence for the Gospels. At this point, there’s a double-standard going on.

                          A few days ago I saw someone share in a group a story that was first published years ago. It was about Joseph Atwill and his book CaesarÂ’s Messiah. For those who donÂ’t know, this is the guy that even Richard Carrier calls a crank with his hypothesis that Christianity was invented by the Romans to control the poor and so Jesus never existed. This atheist who shared it was so happy a Bible scholar was finally showing the truth.

                          Except that not even atheist Bible scholars took Atwill seriously. These are the same atheists that will commit ritual suicide before they dare read anything by a Christian scholar, but when someone they donÂ’t even know agrees with them, heÂ’s a scholar. For many atheists, it seems like the reasoning goes like this.

                          Does the claim make Christianity look bad or argue that it is false?
                          Then the claim is entirely true!
                          Does the claim defend Christianity or leave it looking good or at least neutral?
                          Then the claim is entirely false!

                          No research is needed.

                          Jesus mythicism is a fine example of this. The people who decry creationists for going against the reigning opinion of biologists and other scientists will happily embrace this fringe movement and base all their hope on Richard Carrier. If anything, when I see atheists argue like this, it really convinces me they donÂ’t know what theyÂ’re talking about.

                          Memes are one of the biggest culprits in this area. Atheists will often post memes meant to be one-liners or something close to show Christianity is nonsense. Normally, these are laden with hideously bad argumentation and a lack of understanding of the claims of Christianity. Memes can be fine illustrations if you have been establishing a point, but please donÂ’t make them the centerpiece of your argument.

                          Please note I am not saying we Christians can never be just as bad on our own end. What I am claiming is that the party of evidence drops the idea of evidence when it suits them. I know a number of atheists that are not like this, but there are too many that are and if atheists want to be taken seriously, they should try to silence those that are like this. I think of Tim OÂ’Neill who runs the website, History for Atheists, who is doing great work in this regard as an atheist.

                          And also, I donÂ’t really try to persuade these people that Christianity is true. TheyÂ’re not really listening. My debate is for the audience who is watching.

                          In Christ,
                          Nick Peters
                          Interesting how Coyne claims that if such events occurred that would be evidence to him God and the supernatural exist. Problem is given his naturalism how do we know he will not try and seek out natural explanations for this event? Even Richard Richard Lewontin said Science has a commitment to Materialism which does not allow for any other alternative.

                          Also I find it funny skeptics talk about problems with the dating of the gospels being too late as evidence, but yet they have no problem accepting the Gnostic Gospels as evidence for so called various forms of Christianity and works as Davinci Code and Atwell's fridge theories. Least the skeptic forgets that not even the world in which Christ lived, they didn't accept everything at face value, We see this in various examples such as the need to test prophets (Deuteronomy 18; 1st John 4:1), not to follow false gods and idols (Leviticus 19:4; 26:1 ; Deuteronomy 4:19; Leviticus 17:7).

                          The atheist attempts to be neutral in their worldview, but the fact is all worldviews have presuppositions in which they interpret evidence and Atheism is not excluded. While Atheism is the idea that God does not exist, it has a philosophy built into it. This can be Naturalism, Marxism, Nihilism, Objectivism or any form of philosophical concepts and ideas. If Atheism is simply a lack of belief in God why do they write books and debate the issues? to me it would seem better if the Atheist pleaded ignorance and adopted Agnosticism.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Seeker View Post
                            Off-topic, but is Christ myth theory supported by ANY serious historians and academics? I mean, even ONE?
                            Only main one is Richard Carrier, that is, the unemployed polyamorous prominent internet blogger Richard Carrier who's banned from Skepticon.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Apologiaphoenix View Post
                              Only main one is Richard Carrier, that is, the unemployed polyamorous prominent internet blogger Richard Carrier who's banned from Skepticon.
                              He said serious historians and academics.
                              Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. – St. John Chrysostom

                              Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
                              sigpic
                              I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist

                              Comment

                              Related Threads

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by Apologiaphoenix, 03-15-2024, 10:19 PM
                              14 responses
                              75 views
                              1 like
                              Last Post rogue06
                              by rogue06
                               
                              Started by Apologiaphoenix, 03-13-2024, 10:13 PM
                              6 responses
                              61 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
                              Started by Apologiaphoenix, 03-12-2024, 09:36 PM
                              1 response
                              23 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post rogue06
                              by rogue06
                               
                              Started by Apologiaphoenix, 03-11-2024, 10:19 PM
                              0 responses
                              22 views
                              2 likes
                              Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
                              Started by Apologiaphoenix, 03-08-2024, 11:59 AM
                              7 responses
                              57 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post whag
                              by whag
                               
                              Working...
                              X