Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: Judge blows a huge hole in the Mueller report

  1. #21
    tWebber Mountain Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    United States
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    16,445
    Amen (Given)
    5554
    Amen (Received)
    5760
    And it gets even more interesting: a new court filling with supporting documents says that Jillian Assange's source for the DNC emails was Seth Rich and not Russian hackers, which would mean that Crowdstrke's analysis and subsequent claims by US intelligence agencies is 100% false.

    The ramifications here are almost too large to describe.

    If this information turns out to be true and accurate, the entire narrative around the DNC “hack” will have been proven to be intentionally manufactured.

    Despite the FBI’s prior admissions about never reviewing the DNC servers; and despite their recent admissions about never actually seeing the forensic computer analysis, the U.S. Department of Justice, specifically Robert Mueller, Andrew Weissmann and former DAG Rod Rosenstein, cannot blame a simple investigative ‘mistake‘ for the wrong attribution of who gave the DNC emails to Wikileaks.

    The FBI, the DOJ and the Mueller special counsel have each purposefully claimed specific Russian actors were responsible for hacking the DNC in 2016. If it turns out those claims were based on falsehood, the integrity of the DOJ and Special Counsel collapses.

    https://theconservativetreehouse.com...-russian-hack/
    Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
    But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
    Than a fool in the eyes of God


    From "Fools Gold" by Petra

  2. #22
    Must...have...caffeine One Bad Pig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Inside the beltway
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    20,715
    Amen (Given)
    6065
    Amen (Received)
    11548
    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Man View Post
    And it gets even more interesting: a new court filling with supporting documents says that Jillian Assange's source for the DNC emails was Seth Rich and not Russian hackers, which would mean that Crowdstrke's analysis and subsequent claims by US intelligence agencies is 100% false.

    The ramifications here are almost too large to describe.

    If this information turns out to be true and accurate, the entire narrative around the DNC “hack” will have been proven to be intentionally manufactured.

    Despite the FBI’s prior admissions about never reviewing the DNC servers; and despite their recent admissions about never actually seeing the forensic computer analysis, the U.S. Department of Justice, specifically Robert Mueller, Andrew Weissmann and former DAG Rod Rosenstein, cannot blame a simple investigative ‘mistake‘ for the wrong attribution of who gave the DNC emails to Wikileaks.

    The FBI, the DOJ and the Mueller special counsel have each purposefully claimed specific Russian actors were responsible for hacking the DNC in 2016. If it turns out those claims were based on falsehood, the integrity of the DOJ and Special Counsel collapses.

    https://theconservativetreehouse.com...-russian-hack/
    Interesting. I've skimmed the lawsuit on scribd, but I'm not quite sure what to make of it. Somewhat unusually, it's filed by a lawyer using a yahoo.com email address.
    Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. – St. John Chrysostom

    Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio

    I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •