I stumbled upon this page in the middle of a discussion at another site.
I'd like to hear opinions.
Two things in particular caught my eye, and seem contrary to what I've read from various scholars:
-- The part about the books of Romans and Hebrews being side-by-side in that codex or whatever; in the absence of further info (which the author does not provide), this suggests that the "old" view that Paul wrote Hebrews is correct.
-- The part where all four Gospels were always bound together, and the related part downplaying the idea of different "communities." We often hear ideas along the lines that the various NT authors *primarily* wrote to their own communities (i.e. the churches they and their associates founded and oversaw).
I'd like to hear opinions.
Two things in particular caught my eye, and seem contrary to what I've read from various scholars:
-- The part about the books of Romans and Hebrews being side-by-side in that codex or whatever; in the absence of further info (which the author does not provide), this suggests that the "old" view that Paul wrote Hebrews is correct.
-- The part where all four Gospels were always bound together, and the related part downplaying the idea of different "communities." We often hear ideas along the lines that the various NT authors *primarily* wrote to their own communities (i.e. the churches they and their associates founded and oversaw).
Comment