Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Mass Shooting El Paso...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Adrift View Post
    If I'm dismissive it's because we've had this same discussion a half dozen times, and I think the excuses I get are, like, literally insane, and mostly not anything anyone actually takes seriously when they offer them.
    To be honest, I'm on your side of the debate and I don't think your argument here is particularly strong or on point. They're discussing guerrilla warfare and you're going on about a Terminator-esque 'kill every thing that moves' war that is actually the far more unrealistic of the two. Neither, in my estimation, is a particularly likely scenario.

    They are correct about the original reasoning behind the second amendment. But the argument that the American military cannot be defeated if it has no political holds on it is nonsensical - it can't be defeated if it has Star Wars type blasters, either and that's more likely than a military with no political holds in the US. It literally has no precedent. And it may not even be true - the US should not have won against the British, but we did (mostly via attrition, but a win is a win!).

    The better argument is that if such action occurred, the resultant government could never again function as the US government we want. Taking up arms isn't going to get better governance - it's going to destroy the very governance you're after.

    Also, yeah, there are people who take the gun ownership thing to ridiculous levels - but that's literally true of almost everything. There's always at least one moron that takes things too far - it's not a good argument against anything.

    I'd prefer a world minus any guns at all - but I can't have that. Abolition sounds great - except for the patently unfair and unconstitutional thing. Other countries do lots of things - which is evidence that things can work but it has to be taken in context - and there are no countries all that similar to the US with such bans (to be fair, there aren't that many countries that are all that similar to the US! We take the First Amendment for granted yet it is virtually unique in the world).

    Personally, I'm for strengthening the civil liabilities (your dog, your responsibility, yes, really) more than increasing specific weapons laws beyond what's in place now (adding more complexity just adds more wiggle room) and toughening up the holes in the interstate trade (if you can't legally buy it where you live, you shouldn't be able to subvert that law by going to another state).

    The simple reason is that they are measures we can get and that can make a difference. Measures that cannot be implemented are of no use - and we are decades away from any real shot at convincing the nation that any form of stringent ban is a good idea - at the very least. Probably more thanks the Court incorporating the second amendment...
    "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." - Jim Elliot

    "Forgiveness is the way of love." Gary Chapman

    My Personal Blog

    My Novella blog (Current Novella Begins on 7/25/14)

    Quill Sword

    Comment


    • Originally posted by demi-conservative View Post

      Yes, there are fanatics, but what is point of this? Lots of crazy people about lots of things, also does not mean they dominate culture.
      If you actually read my post, you would have noted where I pointed out that one of my examples sits on the board of the NRA. That's not dominant?
      "I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill

      Comment


      • Originally posted by KingsGambit View Post
        For the sarcastically impaired the following is said in jest

        If you really cared about drunk driving, you would push to ban all cars. That would solve the problem. The fact that none of you are willing to consider that means that you don't really care about saving lives.

        Self-driving cars will solve the drunk driving problem.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Sparko View Post
          Self-driving cars will solve the drunk driving problem.
          Until they start increasing the amount of ethanol in gasoline!


          The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Adrift View Post
            I think all of the insanely weird excuse making for why guns can't be gotten rid of is just absolutely, and comically ridiculous, especially when we've seen plenty of other first world nations doing so and doing so without much issue. As a realist, I know it will never happen, not because it's impossible to do so. Not because the Constitution can't be rewritten. Not because it will lead to some crazy hypothetical post-apocalyptic world where the US government will one day rise up and kill it's citizenry (but also the military will side with the citizenry making the point moot, but also even if the military didn't side with the citizenry, it's not powerful enough to outgun them), no, it's not because of any of those reasons. It's because American's are absolutely fanatical about their killing devices. They LOVE them. Some near worship them (I've literally seen what I can only describe as gun shrines). At best I can hope for tighter gun control laws, but I know my idea of an out and out gun ban is unrealistic. I'm just sick and tired of hearing of people dying, children dying, from what seems to me a completely preventable issue.
            Let me guess...Adrift, as a former Military Policeman, has a quite a bit of self-defense training, is still relatively young and/or still in decent shape, and/or is a large man (who by his size) or, because of all the above has little to fear from most threats that are NOT a gun? How close am I?
            "What has the Church gained if it is popular, but there is no conviction, no repentance, no power?" - A.W. Tozer

            "... there are two parties in Washington, the stupid party and the evil party, who occasionally get together and do something both stupid and evil, and this is called bipartisanship." - Everett Dirksen

            Comment


            • Sheesh. Is this really the best you could do? Pitiful.
              Originally posted by Tassman View Post
              It’s an invalid comparison. Hitler was even more influenced by German notables such as the composer Richard Wagner and his operas, especially the Ring Cycle of operas, than the mere word “struggle” in the title of Darwin’s book.
              You act like I agreed with this argument and decided to argue that rather than the validity of the comparison using it to illustrate the bankruptcy of your argument. But then I'm hardly surprised that you'd flunk out and be incapable of showing why it was an invalid comparison as you asserted without a scintilla of evidence to support your claim -- and continue to do so.

              And as an aside, in an effort to educate the unteachable, Wagner was at best a minor influence whereas folks like Houston Stewart Chamberlain and Arthur de Gobineau had a much more profound influence[1]

              Originally posted by Tassman View Post
              It is laughable, but typical, that you should compare a book title with the endless repetition of Trump’s “invasion” talk at rallies and on Twitter and in numerous Facebook ads.
              This coming from someone whose only connection between Trump and the El Paso shooter is that they both had one word in common. smiley snicker.gif

              Originally posted by Tassman View Post
              No, what the shooter made clear as the primary "motivating factor" was his white supremacist fear, as reinforced by Donald Trump
              Man you must really revel wallowing in failure.

              The shooter never once mentioned Trump. In fact, looking at his left-wing philosophy it is extremely doubtful that he really gives a rat's hind end what Trump says or thinks.

              The only supposed connection is that they both used the word "invasion." This is why I mention the nutjob who vehemently argued that Darwin influenced Hitler because both used the word "struggle" in their title of their of their books. You and those who claim that the shooter was influenced by Trump are no different. You both base everything on them using one word in common.

              Originally posted by Tassman View Post
              Yes you did, at length. It seems that you agree that Trump and the El Paso shooter were correct in their assessment of a violent Hispanic invasion being underway. The shooter merely acted upon this assessment. Isn't that what any patriotic citizen would do?
              So, you are incapable of refuting the fact that many of the illegal immigrants are behaving like invaders. No surprise there.





              1. Something I wrote in a fascinating discussion with Freezbee for the pre-crash tweb:

              The person who had the the most impact on Hitler and Nazi thought in general was Houston Stewart Chamberlain. Though an Englishman by birth he lived in continental Europe since before he was a year old and was a thorough Germanophile becoming a German citizen during the midst of WWI and enthusiastically spoke out on behalf of the German government. He was also a vehement anti-Semite.

              His two-volume book, Die Grundlagen des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts ("The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century"), published in 1899, which promoted several racially supremacy and especially völkisch antisemitic theories on how he saw the Aryan race as superior to others, became a principle reference for Nazi racial policy. It was heavily influenced by the writings of Arthur de Gobineau who had argued the superiority of the "Aryan race" in his book "An Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races" (1853–1855).

              Of the natural sciences, Chamberlain wrote in his "The Foundations" that "one of the most fatal errors of our time is that which impels us to give too great weight to the so-called 'results' of science." He emphasized a concept known as "Gestalt,"[1] which derived from Goethe and led him to completely rejected Darwin's theory of evolution which he regarded as as, “a manifestly unsound system.”

              The fact that Darwinian evolution proclaimed that species were perpetually transforming themselves made that theory, for Chamberlain, the most abominable and misguided doctrine of his time. Chamberlain declared that it was a "craze [that] works such mischief" and a "belated straggler of Romanticism and Hegelism in alliance with flat English utilitarianism, and that a hundred years will not have passed before it will be judged as men today judge alchemy" and called for the "energetic shaking off of this 'English sickness.'" He emphatically decried “the evolution mania and the pseudo-scientific dogmatism of our century” and “the frenzy produced by the dogma of evolution, which has led to such confusion of thought in the 19th Century.”

              In his 1905 work Immanuel Kant. Die Persönlichkeit als Einführung in das Werk ("Immanuel Kant. The personality as an introduction to the work") he attacked evolutionary theory repeatedly stating that “A characteristic symptom of our modern intellectual disease is the increasing tendency to relegate things to ever remoter and remoter origins. Thus, for instance, man was said to be descended from the ape; the anatomical impossibility of this is established to-day by a thousand reasons” and “the nonsensical dogmas of the theorisers on natural selection and descent may once and for all be rejected.”

              Chamberlain joined the Nazi Party and contributed to its publications. Chamberlain's depiction of a struggle between Gestalt or order-bearing Teutons and the chaos-sowing Jews and half-breeds served as a source for some of the key imagery used by Hitler in his "Mein Kampf."

              Early in his political career Hitler, along with Joseph Goebbels, visited Chamberlain twice before the latter's death, in 1923 and 1926. The official newspaper of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (Nazis), the Völkischer Beobachter ("Völkisch Observer") would dedicate five columns to praising him on his 70th birthday, describing The Foundations as the "gospel of the Nazi movement." Hitler attended Chamberlain's funeral in January 1927 along with several highly ranked members of the Nazi party.

              Truth. Ever the bane for YEC historic revisionists.



              1. From Reenchanted Science: Holism in German Culture from Wilhelm II to Hitler by Anne Harrington; 1999, p. 106:
              According to Chamberlain's Lebenslehre (Theory of Life) of 1896, the presence of Gestalt was what distinguished life from nonlife: "Everything that lives has Gestalt -- Life is Gestalt"
              ]
              Last edited by rogue06; 08-12-2019, 02:44 PM.

              I'm always still in trouble again

              "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
              "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
              "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

              Comment


              • I honestly don't really have an opinion on the whole gun control debate thingy. I just don't like how it detracts from the victims.
                If it weren't for the Resurrection of Jesus, we'd all be in DEEP TROUBLE!

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Littlejoe View Post
                  Let me guess...Adrift, as a former Military Policeman, has a quite a bit of self-defense training, is still relatively young and/or still in decent shape, and/or is a large man (who by his size) or, because of all the above has little to fear from most threats that are NOT a gun? How close am I?
                  For what it's worth, Teallaura soooooo does not fit any of the above - and even when she was young and fit realized that she wouldn't win a knife fight...

                  But she would have a better chance of at least making enough marks for Quincy to do his thing!
                  "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." - Jim Elliot

                  "Forgiveness is the way of love." Gary Chapman

                  My Personal Blog

                  My Novella blog (Current Novella Begins on 7/25/14)

                  Quill Sword

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Teallaura View Post
                    For what it's worth, Teallaura soooooo does not fit any of the above - and even when she was young and fit realized that she wouldn't win a knife fight...

                    But she would have a better chance of at least making enough marks for Quincy to do his thing!
                    Fun Fact: One of the secrets of winning a knife fight against a skilled opponent is being willing to offer up the arm not holding the knife as "meat" meaning deliberately using it to take a hit.

                    Yeah, I'm real fun at parties

                    I'm always still in trouble again

                    "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                    "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                    "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
                      Fun Fact: One of the secrets of winning a knife fight against a skilled opponent is being willing to offer up the arm not holding the knife as "meat" meaning deliberately using it to take a hit.

                      Yeah, I'm real fun at parties
                      Yeah, the other is being physically able to fight worth a darn - fit and able aren't the same thing. My 'strategy' would have been - once the fight was inescapable (not as stupid as I look!) - close, hang on and do as much damage as possible while being killed.

                      Not really a fan of that strategy - it only works out well if the guy is a wimp and can't stand pain.

                      Edit: How would you know? You always wake up the next day in the hospital wanting to know if CP still has your beer.
                      "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." - Jim Elliot

                      "Forgiveness is the way of love." Gary Chapman

                      My Personal Blog

                      My Novella blog (Current Novella Begins on 7/25/14)

                      Quill Sword

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Teallaura View Post
                        Yeah, the other is being physically able to fight worth a darn - fit and able aren't the same thing. My 'strategy' would have been - once the fight was inescapable (not as stupid as I look!) - close, hang on and do as much damage as possible while being killed.

                        Not really a fan of that strategy - it only works out well if the guy is a wimp and can't stand pain.

                        Edit: How would you know? You always wake up the next day in the hospital wanting to know if CP still has your beer.


                        ETA: Btw, you'd be surprised how much a certain level of ruthlessness can overcome even a more skilled opponent -- as long as they aren't as ruthless themselves of course.
                        Last edited by rogue06; 08-12-2019, 05:27 PM.

                        I'm always still in trouble again

                        "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                        "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                        "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by rogue06 View Post


                          ETA: Btw, you'd be surprised how much a certain level of ruthlessness can overcome even a more skilled opponent -- as long as they aren't as ruthless themselves of course.
                          I believe sun tzu's Art of War says that one should never force people into a corner because they will fight with a tenacity that puts everyone including themselves in danger.

                          He also said that someone who could resolve conflict without fighting was a better soldier.

                          Honestly, I believe that as spiderman said that great power comes with great responsibility
                          sigpic

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by rogue06 View Post


                            ETA: Btw, you'd be surprised how much a certain level of ruthlessness can overcome even a more skilled opponent -- as long as they aren't as ruthless themselves of course.
                            No, I wouldn't - bullied severely in school, figured that out pretty quickly. Not hard when 'more skilled' describes almost everyone and you're an ornery little brat once angry. Lost most fights - but made almost all pay for the win.

                            Doesn't help if they hit you from behind and keep running when you couldn't outrun a sleepy snail having a bad day.
                            "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." - Jim Elliot

                            "Forgiveness is the way of love." Gary Chapman

                            My Personal Blog

                            My Novella blog (Current Novella Begins on 7/25/14)

                            Quill Sword

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
                              Fun Fact: One of the secrets of winning a knife fight against a skilled opponent is being willing to offer up the arm not holding the knife as "meat" meaning deliberately using it to take a hit.

                              Yeah, I'm real fun at parties
                              One of the less well kept secrets is to bring a gun to the knife fight, and don't allow them to get any closer than 6 or 7 meters.
                              The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by TheWall View Post
                                I believe sun tzu's Art of War says that one should never force people into a corner because they will fight with a tenacity that puts everyone including themselves in danger.

                                He also said that someone who could resolve conflict without fighting was a better soldier.

                                Honestly, I believe that as spiderman said that great power comes with great responsibility
                                And always leave your opponent a golden path of retreat?
                                The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                                Comment

                                Related Threads

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by little_monkey, Yesterday, 04:19 PM
                                6 responses
                                45 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post whag
                                by whag
                                 
                                Started by whag, 03-26-2024, 04:38 PM
                                42 responses
                                231 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post whag
                                by whag
                                 
                                Started by rogue06, 03-26-2024, 11:45 AM
                                24 responses
                                104 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Ronson
                                by Ronson
                                 
                                Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 09:21 AM
                                32 responses
                                176 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Hypatia_Alexandria  
                                Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 08:34 AM
                                73 responses
                                290 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Hypatia_Alexandria  
                                Working...
                                X