Epstein Found Dead In Cell...

[demi-conservative]

The day after the unsealing of the indictment involving people as powerful as British royalty? Not buying it.

You think British royalty involvement is plausible?

[myth]

You think British royalty involvement is plausible?

I haven't looked into who's supposed to be involved. But the memes floating around on social media are hilarious, many focusing on the Clintons.

[JimL]

My hopes are up that the Democrats proceed with their impeachment "inquery" thereby all but assuring their being roundly defeated in 2020. Not just the presidency but handing back control of the House.

Yep, I know what the conservative talking heads are feeding you, but the evidence going public, whether the corrupt republican Senate "convicts" him or not, isn't going to help Trumps re-election bid. So hope on!

And the Senate can do nothing to keep the House from impeaching Trump. But then what else can you expect from someone who supports a separate but equal doctrine?

The Senate, can refuse to convict, stupid.

[Cow Poke]

The Senate, can refuse to convict, stupid.

You really don't seem to understand the impeachment process at all, though it has been explained to you multiple times.

Here's what Rogue said...

And the Senate can do nothing to keep the House from impeaching Trump.

Whether the Senate votes to remove from office or not does not change the fact that the House can impeach.

Rouge is absolutely correct - the Senate cannot stop the House from impeaching Trump.

The mistake you repeatedly make is failing to understand that impeachment is simply the House side of the equation. For example, Bill Clinton was impeached by the House. He was not removed by the Senate.

[KingsGambit]

I don't actually buy the trope that the Clintons go around surreptitiously removing dozens of people on command. If they were that powerful, Hillary would be president.

[Raphael]

I don't actually buy the trope that the Clintons go around surreptitiously removing dozens of people on command. If they were that powerful, Hillary would be president.

You have to admit though, a serious number of people who have dirt on the Clintons have ended up conveniently dead.

[KingsGambit]

You have to admit though, a serious number of people who have dirt on the Clintons have ended up conveniently dead.

I've looked into it and a high number of people that are cited as part of the theory in reality had little to no relationship to them, and certainly no hard evidence of any "dirt".

[demi-conservative]

I don't actually buy the trope that the Clintons go around surreptitiously removing dozens of people on command. If they were that powerful, Hillary would be president.

Trump has great security, yuge, the best.

[KingsGambit]

Trump has great security, yuge, the best.

That's not what I'm implying.

[Tassman]

You mean the same guy that permanently banned him from his properties as soon as he discovered that he had accosted one of his underage female employees?

Seriously!

The guy who openly boasts about grabbing women by their genitals and planting unwanted tic-tac flavored kisses on them is shocked that Epstein "accosted one of his underage female employees".

"Donald Trump has called Epstein a “terrific guy” and “a lot of fun to be with”. Epstein paid two visits to the president’s Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, in 1997 and 2000, posing for photos with Trump on both occasions. Epstein’s personal address book, leaked in 2009, contained 14 phone numbers for Trump and members of his staff, according to reports".

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...linton-friends

[demi-conservative]

That's not what I'm implying.

Then what?

She thought she was winning till very end. Who else for her to bump off?

[rogue06]

Yep, I know what the conservative talking heads are feeding you, but the evidence going public, whether the corrupt republican Senate "convicts" him or not, isn't going to help Trumps re-election bid. So hope on!

The Senate, can refuse to convict, stupid.

You were claiming that the Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was keeping the House of Representatives from impeaching Trump. That little jimmy revealed a woeful level of ignorance -- much like your claim that the House and Senate operated under the separate but equal doctrine.

[rogue06]

Seriously!

The guy who openly boasts about grabbing women by their genitals and planting unwanted tic-tac flavored kisses on them is shocked that Epstein "accosted one of his underage female employees".

"Donald Trump has called Epstein a “terrific guy” and “a lot of fun to be with”. Epstein paid two visits to the president’s Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, in 1997 and 2000, posing for photos with Trump on both occasions. Epstein’s personal address book, leaked in 2009, contained 14 phone numbers for Trump and members of his staff, according to reports".

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...linton-friends

All prior to Trump banning him from his properties for accosting an underage staffer. Why is it that you're incapable of dealing with that incontrovertible fact?

[rogue06]

I don't actually buy the trope that the Clintons go around surreptitiously removing dozens of people on command. If they were that powerful, Hillary would be president.

While I don't subscribe to the idea that they murder those who get in their way, Hillary lost largely due to arrogance on her part. She thought it was in the bag, that her victory was assured. That was why, in part, she kept taking so much time off from campaigning (that and health issues) as well as not even bothering to campaigning in several key states.

[Tassman]

All prior to Trump banning him from his properties for accosting an underage staffer. Why is it that you're incapable of dealing with that incontrovertible fact?

Incontrovertible? Who said Trump banned Epstein from his properties for accosting an underage staffer, Trump? He’s a pathological liar. It’s hard to believe that Trump would be shocked at Epstein’s sexual activities given Trump’s own record of exploitative sexual aggression towards women. This is Trump performing his tried and true "I barely knew him" strategy. Let's remember that it was Epstein who introduced Melania to Donald.