Page 6 of 17 FirstFirst ... 4567816 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 165

Thread: Confirmations of the New Testament

  1. #51
    tWebber Teallaura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    In my house.
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Female
    Posts
    15,036
    Amen (Given)
    9031
    Amen (Received)
    5556
    Quote Originally Posted by shunyadragon View Post
    There are no claims of eyewitnesses in the references so far.
    Source material ALWAYS trumps historian assumption/interpretation.

    Isn't it hard to eat with your fingers in your ears?

  2. #52
    tWebber Tassman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Sydney/Phuket
    Faith
    Atheist
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    11,448
    Amen (Given)
    2492
    Amen (Received)
    1802
    Quote Originally Posted by Chrawnus View Post
    I was responding to Tassman's claim about "the extant texts of the New Testament contain[ing] literally thousands of variations, or variants, from each other." I was not saying anything about Christian interpolations in texts from other ancient authors like Tacitus or Josephus.
    The problem is that there is no original text or autograph. The original copies of the NT books have long since disappeared. After all they were written on papyrus, a very fragile and perishable material. More to the point, the original copies of the NT books were not looked upon as scripture by those of the early Christian communities.

    Leading Biblical scholars Kurt and Barbara Aland say in the ‘The Text of The New Testament, 1995’:

    “Until the beginning of the fourth century the text of the New Testament developed freely. It was the "living text" in the Greek literary tradition, unlike the text of the Hebrew Old Testament, which was subject to strict controls because (in the oriental tradition) the consonantal text was holy. And the New Testament text continued to be a "living text" as long as it remained a manuscript tradition, even when the Byzantine church molded it to the procrustean bed of the standard and officially prescribed text. Even for later scribes, for example, the parallel passages of the Gospels were so familiar that they would adapt the text of one Gospel to that of another. They also felt themselves free to make corrections in the text, improving it by their own standard of correctness, whether grammatically, stylistically, or more substantively. This was all the more true of the early period, when the text had not been attained canonical status, especially in the earliest period when Christians considered themselves to be filled with the Spirit. As a consequence the text of the early period was many-faceted, and each manuscript had its own peculiar character”.
    “He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.

  3. #53
    tWebber shunyadragon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Hillsborough, NC
    Faith
    Agnostic
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    14,247
    Amen (Given)
    1538
    Amen (Received)
    965
    Quote Originally Posted by lee_merrill View Post
    Repeating your claim requires me to repeat my response:

    Many have undertaken to draw up an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us, just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eyewitnesses and servants of the word. With this in mind, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, I too decided to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught." (Lk 1:1–4)

    "For we did not follow cleverly devised stories when we told you about the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ in power, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty." (2 Pet. 1:16) [/q

    "That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched—this we proclaim concerning the Word of life. 2 The life appeared; we have seen it and testify to it, and we proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and has appeared to us. 3 We proclaim to you what we have seen and heard, so that you also may have fellowship with us." (1 Jn 1:1–3)

    And people claiming to be eyewitnesses, when their claim could be verified, is evidence that indeed they testified of what they had seen and heard.

    Blessings,
    Lee
    Abain, again, and again . . . absolutely none of these references claim to refer to eye witness to the life of Christ. What they witnessed in their life is another matter. Yes, there were likely many writings before Luke including Mark, Mathew, and possibly Q, and also other writings not accepted by
    christians, but none of this reflects claims of eye witnesses.

    Tassman's post is accurate with an accurate academic citation. It need not be repeated.
    Last edited by shunyadragon; 08-24-2019 at 12:23 PM.
    Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
    Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
    But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:

    go with the flow the river knows . . .

    Frank

    I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.

  4. #54
    tWebber shunyadragon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Hillsborough, NC
    Faith
    Agnostic
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    14,247
    Amen (Given)
    1538
    Amen (Received)
    965
    Quote Originally Posted by Teallaura View Post
    Source material ALWAYS trumps historian assumption/interpretation.

    Isn't it hard to eat with your fingers in your ears?
    There are no claims of eyewitnesses in the references so far.

    Isn't it hard to eat with your fingers in your ears?

    Tassman's post is accurate with an accurate academic citation. It need not be repeated, unless you have a reading deficiency problem.
    Last edited by shunyadragon; 08-24-2019 at 12:24 PM.
    Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
    Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
    But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:

    go with the flow the river knows . . .

    Frank

    I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.

  5. #55
    tWebber lee_merrill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    1,210
    Amen (Given)
    400
    Amen (Received)
    225
    Quote Originally Posted by Tassman View Post
    Leading Biblical scholars Kurt and Barbara Aland say in the ‘The Text of The New Testament, 1995’:

    “Until the beginning of the fourth century the text of the New Testament developed freely. It was the "living text" in the Greek literary tradition, unlike the text of the Hebrew Old Testament, which was subject to strict controls because (in the oriental tradition) the consonantal text was holy. And the New Testament text continued to be a "living text" as long as it remained a manuscript tradition, even when the Byzantine church molded it to the procrustean bed of the standard and officially prescribed text. Even for later scribes, for example, the parallel passages of the Gospels were so familiar that they would adapt the text of one Gospel to that of another. They also felt themselves free to make corrections in the text, improving it by their own standard of correctness, whether grammatically, stylistically, or more substantively. This was all the more true of the early period, when the text had not been attained canonical status, especially in the earliest period when Christians considered themselves to be filled with the Spirit. As a consequence the text of the early period was many-faceted, and each manuscript had its own peculiar character”.
    That's strange, I've been reading the Nestle-Aland critical edition of the Greek NT, and the variants I've checked have not been significant. There are some well-known variants such as the longer ending of Mark, but they seem to be implying extensive variation here, beyond what is typically mentioned. Could you point me to some variants they refer to here?

    Blessings,
    Lee
    "What I pray of you is, to keep your eye upon Him, for that is everything. Do you say, 'How am I to keep my eye on Him?' I reply, keep your eye off everything else, and you will soon see Him. All depends on the eye of faith being kept on Him. How simple it is!" (J.B. Stoney)

  6. #56
    tWebber lee_merrill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    1,210
    Amen (Given)
    400
    Amen (Received)
    225
    Quote Originally Posted by shunyadragon View Post
    Abain, again, and again . . . absolutely none of these references claim to refer to eye witness to the life of Christ.
    They most certainly do, Peter goes on to talk about the transfiguration, John is talking about "what we have seen and heard and touched we proclaim to you."

    "He received honor and glory from God the Father when the voice came to him from the Majestic Glory, saying, 'This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased.' We ourselves heard this voice that came from heaven when we were with him on the sacred mountain." (2 Pe 1:17–18)

    Blessings,
    Lee
    "What I pray of you is, to keep your eye upon Him, for that is everything. Do you say, 'How am I to keep my eye on Him?' I reply, keep your eye off everything else, and you will soon see Him. All depends on the eye of faith being kept on Him. How simple it is!" (J.B. Stoney)

  7. Amen Teallaura, Chrawnus, NorrinRadd amen'd this post.
  8. #57
    tWebber Teallaura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    In my house.
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Female
    Posts
    15,036
    Amen (Given)
    9031
    Amen (Received)
    5556
    Quote Originally Posted by shunyadragon View Post
    Abain, again, and again . . . absolutely none of these references claim to refer to eye witness to the life of Christ. What they witnessed in their life is another matter. Yes, there were likely many writings before Luke including Mark, Mathew, and possibly Q, and also other writings not accepted by
    christians, but none of this reflects claims of eye witnesses.

    Tassman's post is accurate with an accurate academic citation. It need not be repeated.
    Learn to read:

    "For we did not follow cleverly devised stories when we told you about the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ in power, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty." (2 Pet. 1:16)


    Stop talking like a moron - they are claiming to BE eyewitnesses - an actual eyewitness account trumps an account about an eyewitness.



  9. Amen Chrawnus, NorrinRadd amen'd this post.
  10. #58
    tWebber shunyadragon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Hillsborough, NC
    Faith
    Agnostic
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    14,247
    Amen (Given)
    1538
    Amen (Received)
    965
    Quote Originally Posted by Teallaura View Post
    Learn to read:

    "For we did not follow cleverly devised stories when we told you about the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ in power, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty." (2 Pet. 1:16)


    Stop talking like a moron - they are claiming to BE eyewitnesses - an actual eyewitness account trumps an account about an eyewitness.


    Absolutely NO.

    Stop talking like a moron - they are claiming to be the eyewitnesses of his majesty (?), ie testimony of personal experiences. No, mention of being a witness to the life of JEsus Christ.
    Last edited by shunyadragon; 08-24-2019 at 07:04 PM.
    Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
    Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
    But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:

    go with the flow the river knows . . .

    Frank

    I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.

  11. #59
    tWebber Teallaura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    In my house.
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Female
    Posts
    15,036
    Amen (Given)
    9031
    Amen (Received)
    5556
    Quote Originally Posted by shunyadragon View Post
    Absolutely NO.

    Stop talking like a moron - they are claiming to be the eyewitnesses of his majesty (?), ie testimony of personal experiences. No, mention of being a witness to the life of JEsus Christ.
    And repeating moronic drivel doesn't make it any the less moronic.

    That's not even pedantic - it's literally insane. Being an eyewitness to the Person doing anything at all is more than sufficient to establish that Person's existence.

    Oh, and repeating the same exact barb makes you sound even more moronic. Impressive, really - I didn't think anything that can type could be that moronic.

    For the sane people in the room, the point is established.

  12. Amen Chrawnus, NorrinRadd amen'd this post.
  13. #60
    tWebber Tassman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Sydney/Phuket
    Faith
    Atheist
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    11,448
    Amen (Given)
    2492
    Amen (Received)
    1802
    Quote Originally Posted by lee_merrill View Post
    That's strange, I've been reading the Nestle-Aland critical edition of the Greek NT, and the variants I've checked have not been significant. There are some well-known variants such as the longer ending of Mark, but they seem to be implying extensive variation here, beyond what is typically mentioned. Could you point me to some variants they refer to here?
    What we have from Kurt and Barbara Aland, and generally accepted by biblical scholars, is that the concept of 'original text' is non-existent. The New Testament text that we have today is the work of scholarly committees which decided on the readings it thought were most likely closest to the earliest versions of the New Testament.
    Last edited by Tassman; 08-24-2019 at 10:19 PM.
    “He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •