Now for the critical point. Assume for the sake of argument that Rome's claims for Peter are valid
What significance does that have in the here and now?
The Jews had Abraham for their father 2000 years (more or less) after Abraham's time. Rome has Peter for her father, 2000 years (more or less) after Peter's time.
We know what Jesus had to say about the Jews' claim for their father - it's only true if you follow the path established by the ancestor in question. Even rocks can be raised up as children for the righteous ancestor.
What significance does that have in the here and now?
The Jews had Abraham for their father 2000 years (more or less) after Abraham's time. Rome has Peter for her father, 2000 years (more or less) after Peter's time.
We know what Jesus had to say about the Jews' claim for their father - it's only true if you follow the path established by the ancestor in question. Even rocks can be raised up as children for the righteous ancestor.
Comment