Page 25 of 25 FirstFirst ... 15232425
Results 241 to 244 of 244

Thread: Gun Control - moved from E-cig thread

  1. #241
    What's that? lilpixieofterror's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Female
    Posts
    9,633
    Amen (Given)
    1514
    Amen (Received)
    3237
    Quote Originally Posted by oxmixmudd View Post
    We have no problem enforcing the licensing and taxing of automobiles. They are in public view of course, which does make it easier. The hardest to enforce would be private sales by individuals. But I don't see it being that hard. If guns are licensed, then there is a record of ownership. If that gun ends up in the hands of another person committing a crime, you'd better have a document showing you had a background check done, or you'd better have reported it stolen. And when you report a gun stolen, you'd better be able to show you took reasonable precautions against it being stolen.
    Your claim runs into the problem that car licensing and tags are only required if you plan on driving on a public road. It is legal to drive around an unregistered car, without a license, on your own property. Most people donít own that kind of land and own a motor vehicle for the purpose of driving on public roads, so most tend to be registered and licensed. Most gun owners own them for defense and donít normally take them out, so your comparison fails right there. Second, arresting people for having their guns stolen will only lead to people simply not reporting them stolen. Third, your plan is against the 4th amendment. It is the governmentís job to prove you did something wrong, not yours to disprove. Again, your plan had all sorts of issues that you choose to ignore because you donít like the cold splash of reality. Thereís an estimated 300 million to 500 million guns, in private hands. Most mandatory gun buy backs have failed to collect or register even 10%. What is your plan for the other 90%+ that wonít comply?

    We don't have to take away guns. We just have to have and enforce reasonable laws governing their ownership. When they are used in a crime, any person that bent the rules, cut corners, refused to comply with those laws, needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law in a way that allows them to be held accountable for the deaths that occurred.
    Thatís a great plan, letís make criminals out of millions, what could possibility go wrong? We already have a drug war flushing billions down the drain, whatís a few billion more?


    I just can't imagine anyone responsible enough to own a gun that would risk his life and career and family by trying to bend such laws. Just the act of eschewing them would indicate the person probably should not be allowed to own guns in the first place. Our rights can be forfeited if we commit a crime. Just make irresponsible gun ownership a crime and there should be no 2nd amendment conflict.
    You canít imagine it because you stick your fingers in your ears, cover your eyes, and hide from the facts that you donít like and puff, your plan is great. Your buy back ideas donít work, ask New Zealand, your mandatory registration wonít work, ask New Zealand again. Your plan for arresting people for reporting their property stolen will lead to people simply not reporting it stolen. Youíll make criminals out of millions and clog up the legal system in prosecuting these crimes and make it even easier for mass shooters to carry out their plans. Great plan.
    Last edited by lilpixieofterror; 09-22-2019 at 07:35 AM.
    "The man from the yacht thought he was the first to find England; I thought I was the first to find Europe. I did try to found a heresy of my own; and when I had put the last touches to it, I discovered that it was orthodoxy."
    GK Chesterton; Orthodoxy

  2. #242
    Troll Magnet Sparko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    49,946
    Amen (Given)
    4999
    Amen (Received)
    22192
    Quote Originally Posted by oxmixmudd View Post
    I don't believe you are taking into account all of what I said, but since you don't reference the post you are referring to, I have no objective means of evaluating that. I can tell you that your characterization of gun control as 'punishment' is wrong. A gun is a dangerous weapon, and high capacity semi-automatics a seriously dangerous weapon, and so there is a responsibility to the public to do what can be done to keep such weapons out of the hands of those that would use them to kill innocent people. Gun control laws are part of that process. Having them, complying with them, is just the civic duty of the gun owner.

    Jim
    "Guns are dangerous weapons" -- that's kind of the point Jim. They are supposed to be dangerous weapons. That is why people have them for self-defense. If I am defending my life or my family I want as dangerous of a weapon as I can get my hands on. I want it to be as unfair to the guys attacking us as possible. I want a fast shooting, high capacity weapon that can kill them before they can kill me or my family or friends. And I have the RIGHT to have those weapons and to defend myself. And that right is not given to me by the constitution. It is an inalienable right. The 2nd amendment doesn't give us the right to own and bear arms. It just says the government can't infringe on my right to do so.

    And taking them out of my hands isn't going to take them out of the criminal's hands. They will still find a way to get them.

  3. Amen RumTumTugger amen'd this post.
  4. #243
    tWebber
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Maryland
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    6,118
    Amen (Given)
    354
    Amen (Received)
    1666
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparko View Post
    "Guns are dangerous weapons" -- that's kind of the point Jim. They are supposed to be dangerous weapons. That is why people have them for self-defense. If I am defending my life or my family I want as dangerous of a weapon as I can get my hands on. I want it to be as unfair to the guys attacking us as possible. I want a fast shooting, high capacity weapon that can kill them before they can kill me or my family or friends. And I have the RIGHT to have those weapons and to defend myself. And that right is not given to me by the constitution. It is an inalienable right. The 2nd amendment doesn't give us the right to own and bear arms. It just says the government can't infringe on my right to do so.

    And taking them out of my hands isn't going to take them out of the criminal's hands. They will still find a way to get them.
    I think I've said what I think on this and have given ample opportunity to hear other views and offer my comments on them. Thanks all for the conversation, but there is little more to be gained by continued discussion at this time.

    Jim
    He will reply, ĎTruly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me."

    "So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets"

  5. #244
    Troll Magnet Sparko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    49,946
    Amen (Given)
    4999
    Amen (Received)
    22192
    Quote Originally Posted by oxmixmudd View Post
    I think I've said what I think on this and have given ample opportunity to hear other views and offer my comments on them. Thanks all for the conversation, but there is little more to be gained by continued discussion at this time.

    Jim
    I agree. Thanks for the debate.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •