Do you think Trump will actually be impeached?

[Charles]

Sounds like all you've done is think you found an opportunity to do your Christians Я Bad spiel even if you had to shoehorn it into a response showing support for Trump growing (especially among Indeps) in the face of an impeachment inquiry.

Covenient narrative. Does nothing to adress my thinking, though.

[Charles]

Do you really think that explains why his numbers are going up -- especially among Independents?

Like Cow Poke you forget the "Part of..." It cannot be too hard to see I do not claim to explain everything, and my statement does not even adress independents. Any points to make about what I actually wrote?

[Charles]

Ad hominems about me and the source I pointed to. You know the genetic fallacy, or? If not it is right there in your own post. Let's see if you can find it.

[Cow Poke]

Ad hominems about me....

Shall I call the WAAAAAaaaaambulanc?

[rogue06]

Like Cow Poke you forget the "Part of..." It cannot be too hard to see I do not claim to explain everything, and my statement does not even adress independents. Any points to make about what I actually wrote?

The problem is that it really doesn't explain anything and pointing to the Indeps was a way of trying to get that across to you.

[KingsGambit]

This thread isn't supposed to be about the normative question about whether he should be impeached. We have approximately 20 other threads going right now over that issue.

[Tassman]

Do you really think that explains why his numbers are going up -- especially among Independents?

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/07/poll...-to-trump.html

[Charles]

The problem is that it really doesn't explain anything and pointing to the Indeps was a way of trying to get that across to you.

When I state that part of the reason could be something particular I am neither claiming to explain everything nor to give a certain statement about the reason in some particular area. Seems you continue to miss the very basics about what I actually said.