Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Take This Impeachment And Shove It...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by seanD View Post
    Dude, someone who has no problem criticizing Trump for his faults on this forum is not what a bubble makes. Someone who incessantly parrots "orange man bad" 24/7 and that Biden, Hillary, or any other politician from the democratic party can do no wrong and to suggest otherwise is because they're susceptible to conservative propaganda conspiracies, fake journalist hacks, Russian propaganda or whatever is the very definition of not just someone in a bubble, but a pretty psychotic one at that.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Tassman View Post
      ...because it seems that the "orange man" IS bad. He's been a very naughty boy.
      The question is, has his "badness" risen (or descended ) to the level of an impeachable offense.

      AND, since impeachment is a political process, can the House actually pass articles of impeachment to the Senate, and will the Senate remove "orange man".

      (It's sounding like some Democrats in the House are starting to think that orange man's naughtiness has risen (or descended) to the level of censure, but not impeachment)
      The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
        (It's sounding like some Democrats in the House are starting to think that orange man's naughtiness has risen (or descended) to the level of censure, but not impeachment)
        Are House Democrats Getting Cold Feet Over Impeachment?

        The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
          You may have missed this earlier, Jim. I'll bold the pertinent part....
          The term "misdemeanor", of course, indicates it's a criminal court, and happens to be the same word used in the US Constitution as one of the offenses for which impeachment can be commenced.

          Do I Have to Appear in Court or Can My Attorney Appear for Me?

          If you are a perpetrator of a misdemeanor, your attorney is allowed to appear in court for you. He/she may defend your rights without your presence on your behalf at all stages of your case. But, if your charge is brought for a felony you must take part in all stages including arraignment, plea, preliminary hearing, parts of a trial and sentencing at the court with your attorney.


          So, as I said, even in a criminal case, the defendant may not be required to be present.
          Interesting that they say "If you are a perpetrator of a misdemeanor" rather than "If you are charged with a misdemeanor." Either they assume everyone is guilty or only those guilty can have their attorney appear in court for them

          I'm always still in trouble again

          "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
          "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
          "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
            Laughing --- I saw that (malarkey) on the side of Biden's bus, and it inspired me to make up a word!

            There's a Houston contractor who regularly uses that word...

            That's the slogan for a national chain. We have them in Atlanta as well.

            I'm always still in trouble again

            "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
            "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
            "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

            Comment


            • Ciaramella's report (legally he is nothing but a leaker and is NOT a whistleblower) was yet another flop on par with the Mueller Report and Mueller's testifying. The hearings were packed with folks who had no direct knowledge but who had heard something from someone who overheard something with the one or two actual witnesses admitting that they had "presumed" and even "guessed"



              Please Clickinate on Imagification

              I'm always still in trouble again

              "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
              "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
              "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

              Comment


              • John Hinderaker has a piece at Powerline where he makes a pretty good case that the Democrats have little choice but to proceed but may wish they didn't when it gets to the Senate:

                Source: ARE HOUSE DEMOCRATS GETTING COLD FEET?

                Source

                © Copyright Original Source


                I'm always still in trouble again

                "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                Comment


                • I don't really trust Roberts. But as I understand it, even if he technically presides over the trial, the Senate itself will set the rules for the trial, so his wishy-washiness may be circumscribed.
                  Geislerminian Antinomian Kenotic Charispneumaticostal Gender Mutualist-Egalitarian.

                  Beige Federalist.

                  Nationalist Christian.

                  "Everybody is somebody's heretic."

                  Social Justice is usually the opposite of actual justice.

                  Proud member of the this space left blank community.

                  Would-be Grand Vizier of the Padishah Maxi-Super-Ultra-Hyper-Mega-MAGA King Trumpius Rex.

                  Justice for Ashli Babbitt!

                  Justice for Matthew Perna!

                  Arrest Ray Epps and his Fed bosses!

                  Comment


                  • Nutty Barr is having a melt-down over the IG report. He might be headed for impeachment too.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by JimL View Post
                      Hey, you've finally recognized the democratic party modis operandi, OBP. Good job!
                      Fixed that for you, no charge.
                      Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
                      sigpic
                      I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
                        Interesting that they say "If you are a perpetrator of a misdemeanor" rather than "If you are charged with a misdemeanor." Either they assume everyone is guilty or only those guilty can have their attorney appear in court for them

                        I think they're criminal defense attorneys - maybe they only get criminal clients.
                        The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by firstfloor View Post
                          Nutty Barr....
                          Does that have nougat?
                          The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by NorrinRadd View Post
                            I don't really trust Roberts. But as I understand it, even if he technically presides over the trial, the Senate itself will set the rules for the trial, so his wishy-washiness may be circumscribed.
                            I think he can be trusted since he will be mainly making decisions about process rather than rendering a final verdict.
                            Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
                            But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
                            Than a fool in the eyes of God


                            From "Fools Gold" by Petra

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                              I think they're criminal defense attorneys - maybe they only get criminal clients.
                              I love the line from Breaking Bad that goes something like, "When you're trouble, you want a criminal lawyer... a *criminal* lawyer."
                              Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
                              But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
                              Than a fool in the eyes of God


                              From "Fools Gold" by Petra

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                                I love the line from Breaking Bad that goes something like, "When you're trouble, you want a criminal lawyer... a *criminal* lawyer."
                                Yeah, we have a 'criminal lawyer' in town who, pretty much anybody knows, if he's the attorney, the client is probably 100% guilty. HOWEVER, we have to presume his client is innocent until proven guilty in court.

                                It's kinda like, "he can get you off", not "he can help you get the justice you deserve".
                                The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                                Comment

                                Related Threads

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 03:46 PM
                                12 responses
                                66 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post rogue06
                                by rogue06
                                 
                                Started by Ronson, Yesterday, 01:52 PM
                                2 responses
                                34 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post rogue06
                                by rogue06
                                 
                                Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 09:08 AM
                                6 responses
                                59 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post RumTumTugger  
                                Started by CivilDiscourse, Yesterday, 07:44 AM
                                0 responses
                                22 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post CivilDiscourse  
                                Started by seer, Yesterday, 07:04 AM
                                50 responses
                                231 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post CivilDiscourse  
                                Working...
                                X