Originally posted by Sam
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
The obvious has been officially confirmed ...
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostThen you'd be able to provide a quote where I actually "asserted" that, yes?
Jim, is incredibly partisan - that's really undeniable.
Serious matter or not, the Democrats are acting like a bunch of jackasses, and Schiff is the ring leader.
They've been at this forever, Jim, and it's one "serious matter" after another after another... and it is clearly partisan.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post...
This is why Schiff has earned the nickname "Shifty Schiff".Geislerminian Antinomian Kenotic Charispneumaticostal Gender Mutualist-Egalitarian.
Beige Federalist.
Nationalist Christian.
"Everybody is somebody's heretic."
Social Justice is usually the opposite of actual justice.
Proud member of the this space left blank community.
Would-be Grand Vizier of the Padishah Maxi-Super-Ultra-Hyper-Mega-MAGA King Trumpius Rex.
Justice for Ashli Babbitt!
Justice for Matthew Perna!
Arrest Ray Epps and his Fed bosses!
Comment
-
The New York Times confirms that Ukraine officials were never told that release of military aid was tied to their willingness to investigate Biden:
To Democrats who say that President Trump’s decision to freeze $391 million in military aid was intended to bully Ukraine’s leader into carrying out investigations for Mr. Trump’s political benefit, the president and his allies have had a simple response: There was no quid pro quo because the Ukrainians did not know assistance had been blocked.
...
In fact, word of the aid freeze had gotten to high-level Ukrainian officials by the first week in August, according to interviews and documents obtained by The New York Times.
And now for the money quote:
The communications did not explicitly link the assistance freeze to the push by Mr. Trump and Mr. Giuliani for the investigations.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/23/u...peachment.htmlSome may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostThere's a reason I asked for a direct quote, Jim, but I should have specified you need to use the "quote function", because Post #109 is actually MM, not me.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]40424[/ATTACH]
How bout trying again, OK?
Comment
-
Barr’s Justice Dept. begins a criminal investigation into their own investigation. Trump will use this to lift Russia sanctions. Russia first!“I think God, in creating man, somewhat overestimated his ability.” ― Oscar Wilde
“And if there were a God, I think it very unlikely that He would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt His existence” ― Bertrand Russell
“not all there” - you know who you are
Comment
-
Originally posted by dirtfloor View PostBarr’s Justice Dept. begins a criminal investigation...
The launch of a criminal probe allows U.S. Attorney John Durham, the prosecutor tapped by Attorney General William Barr to lead the review, to subpoena witnesses for testimony and documents. The move also authorizes Durham to impanel a grand jury and file charges.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...investigation/
As always, The Last Refuge provides in-depth, factual analysis. Required reading for anybody who wants to know what's really going on...
And now we have this bombshell that just blew up in the Democrat party's face:
Lawyers for former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn reportedly filed a motion on Thursday in which they allege that the Department of Justice manipulated a document to frame their client and is withholding exculpatory evidence.
[...]
The new defense filing alleges that the government is refusing to turn over a mountain of potentially exculpatory evidence, some of which has begun to emerge in the media — either through leaks or through ongoing inquiries into the origins of the probe into alleged Russia “collusion” with the Trump campaign, later found not to exist.
That evidence, Flynn’s legal team alleges, includes an apparent admission by former FBI lawyer Lisa Page ... that she had edited the 302... The edits, the filing alleges, were substantive: they included a claim that Flynn said he did not discuss any sanctions with the Russian ambassador. Flynn’s lawyers allege he merely told the FBI he did not recall, and that the claim he said otherwise was added only after a transcript of his discussion with the ambassador had been leaked to the media.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ding-evidence/
Told you things were finally getting interesting!
Last edited by Mountain Man; 10-25-2019, 09:36 AM.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostAnd now we know why Democrats are in full-on panic mode!
The launch of a criminal probe allows U.S. Attorney John Durham, the prosecutor tapped by Attorney General William Barr to lead the review, to subpoena witnesses for testimony and documents. The move also authorizes Durham to impanel a grand jury and file charges.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...investigation/
As always, The Last Refuge provides in-depth, factual analysis. Required reading for anybody who wants to know what's really going on...
And now we have this bombshell that just blew up in the Democrat party's face:
Lawyers for former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn reportedly filed a motion on Thursday in which they allege that the Department of Justice manipulated a document to frame their client and is withholding exculpatory evidence.
[...]
The new defense filing alleges that the government is refusing to turn over a mountain of potentially exculpatory evidence, some of which has begun to emerge in the media — either through leaks or through ongoing inquiries into the origins of the probe into alleged Russia “collusion” with the Trump campaign, later found not to exist.
That evidence, Flynn’s legal team alleges, includes an apparent admission by former FBI lawyer Lisa Page ... that she had edited the 302... The edits, the filing alleges, were substantive: they included a claim that Flynn said he did not discuss any sanctions with the Russian ambassador. Flynn’s lawyers allege he merely told the FBI he did not recall, and that the claim he said otherwise was added only after a transcript of his discussion with the ambassador had been leaked to the media.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ding-evidence/
Told you things were finally getting interesting!
[ATTACH=CONFIG]40430[/ATTACH]
This will rumble on for while until Putin gets what he wants. The US has gone full on banana republic.“I think God, in creating man, somewhat overestimated his ability.” ― Oscar Wilde
“And if there were a God, I think it very unlikely that He would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt His existence” ― Bertrand Russell
“not all there” - you know who you are
Comment
-
More about the recent filing by Flynn's lawyer...
(1) Lisa Page edited the Flynn 302’s, then forgot when questioned by DOJ officials, then re-remembered when shown her texts. (2) The 302’s themselves were written with lies that do not match notes taken during the interview. (3) The felony leaker of the Flynn-Kislyak phone call is named (James Baker). (4) New texts from Page and Strzok that highlight the entrapment plan. (5) ODNI James Clapper telling WaPo reporter Ignatius to “take the kill shot on Flynn“. (6) The purposeful use of Judge Contreras to take the December 1st 2017 plea agreement; and much, much more.
[...]
The FBI leaked details of their investigation to the media and then strategized over how they could weaponize the media reports to conduct investigations. Agent Peter Strzok and FBI Counterintelligence Director Bill Priestap discussed if this approach would work.
The prosecution then intentionally withheld the text messages from Flynn and the public, in their prior releases, showing Peter Strzok and Lisa Page discussing the Strzok & Priestap strategy sessions on using the leaks. Those texts, clear Brady material, were purposefully hidden by the DOJ, until [Flynn lawyer] Sidney Powell went to find them on her own...
[...]
The 302’s were modified to make claims that were never made in the interview. The language was purposefully and willfully made to look like something is wasn’t; and in some cases they made it up completely counter to the actual statement given by Mike Flynn...
https://theconservativetreehouse.com...sidney-powell/
This is big-time stuff, folks. I don't think the importance of this filing can be over-exaggerated!Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostThis is big-time stuff, folks. I don't think the importance of this filing can be over-exaggerated!“I think God, in creating man, somewhat overestimated his ability.” ― Oscar Wilde
“And if there were a God, I think it very unlikely that He would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt His existence” ― Bertrand Russell
“not all there” - you know who you are
Comment
-
Originally posted by dirtfloor View PostRemember that Flynn has already pleaded guilty to his crimes.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
(Although I think he's wrong about Page. It seems she was smart enough to take a deal early in exchange for ratting out her co-conspirators.)Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostAren't you paying attention? He only pleaded guilty because he was lied to, manipulated with fabricated evidence, and denied access to exculpatory evidence. That's why we're currently deep in the process of his guilty plea being overturned, but I think Judge Sullivan is giving Powell all the time she needs to fully expose the Obama administration's corruption before making his final ruling. And you can be sure that Barr and Durham are paying close attention to that case.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimLamebrain View PostYou're a nut, MM. But don't feel bad, you apparently have a lot of company out there, although they at least have an excuse, they're just tribal members who are mostly not paying close attention. Btw, you don't plead guilty, unless you are guilty and want to make a deal for a reduced sentence which is what Flynn did.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by whag, Today, 05:11 PM
|
0 responses
14 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by whag
Today, 05:11 PM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, Today, 11:25 AM
|
32 responses
175 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by oxmixmudd
Today, 07:48 PM
|
||
Started by whag, Yesterday, 01:48 PM
|
24 responses
102 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by whag
Today, 03:25 PM
|
||
Started by CivilDiscourse, Yesterday, 11:56 AM
|
52 responses
269 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seer
Today, 03:05 PM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-16-2024, 07:40 AM
|
77 responses
382 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Today, 05:50 PM |
Comment