Originally posted by lee_merrill
View Post
Oh yes, an entire thread where you unsuccessfully defended the idea that evolution primarily selects for mutations that eliminate function.
Which of the two ways you've argued would you like to adopt for this thread?
(For those who aren't Lee, selection is context dependent, and can select for function, non-function, changed function, etc. Axe's work is specifically looking at function without any selection, and so is completely irrelevant to it.)
Originally posted by lee_merrill
View Post
Again, i'd like to point out that you don't know enough biology to actually recognize the difference. And so i'll ask again - why do you refuse to accept the extensive evidence you have a poor understanding of biology?
Originally posted by lee_merrill
View Post
In other words, Axe's work actually demonstrates why evolution is so incredibly powerful. He just seems incapable of realizing it.
Originally posted by lee_merrill
View Post
Comment