Whistleblower identified

[Mountain Man]

His name is Eric Ciaramella.


And now for the most interesting revelation:


https://www.realclearinvestigations....er_120996.html

So he actually had a vested interest in keeping the Ukraine scandal under wraps. That in and of itself should have been enough to impeach his credibility and deny him whistleblower status.

[Watermelon]

Wouldn't you say that questioning the whistleblowers credibility is now kind of pointless following the Vindman and Taylor testimonies?

[Tassman]

That in and of itself should have been enough to impeach his credibility and deny him whistleblower status.

Apart from breaking the The Whistle-blower Protection Act and putting the whistle-blower's life at risk, considering the death-threats made to his lawyers etc, its irrelevant. All his information has proven correct.

[shunyadragon]

His name is Eric Ciaramella.


And now for the most interesting revelation:


https://www.realclearinvestigations....er_120996.html

So he actually had a vested interest in keeping the Ukraine scandal under wraps. That in and of itself should have been enough to impeach his credibility and deny him whistleblower status.

The politics of the whistleblower is not relevant, because confirmed as accurate by the testimony of others, and the documentation.

[oxmixmudd]

The politics of the whistleblower is not relevant, because confirmed as accurate by the testimony of others, and the documentation.

It matters to people seeking revenge.

[Starlight]

It matters to people seeking revenge.

And to people wanting to prevent future whistle-blowers by making an example of this one.

So far it seems like everything the whistleblower said is being confirmed by the testimony of multiple witnesses. The guy should get some sort of award at the end of this process. The Presidential Medal of Freedom would have suitable irony value.

[Tassman]

And to people wanting to prevent future whistle-blowers by making an example of this one.

Exactly, which is why the laws protecting the anonymity of whistle-blowers are in place.

So far it seems like everything the whistleblower said is being confirmed by the testimony of multiple witnesses. The guy should get some sort of award at the end of this process.

The Presidential Medal of Freedom would have suitable irony value.

Yes it would. By a different president presumably.

[demi-conservative]

Everyone, let's say it together "This time Drumpf is going down, really!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

[firstfloor]

Everyone, let's say it together "This time Drumpf is going down, really!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

[demi-conservative]

[seer]

Wouldn't you say that questioning the whistleblowers credibility is now kind of pointless following the Vindman and Taylor testimonies?

And Vindman and Taylor said what? Anything that contradicted what the released transcript of the call said? The point is Ciaramella was a Democrat operative.

[Mountain Man]

Wouldn't you say that questioning the whistleblowers credibility is now kind of pointless following the Vindman and Taylor testimonies?

Because their testimony contradicted the original accusations?

[oxmixmudd]

Because their testimony contradicted the original accusations?

You are nuts.

[Mountain Man]

The politics of the whistleblower is not relevant, because confirmed as accurate by the testimony of others, and the documentation.

In fact nothing the "whistleblower" said has proven to be correct. Rep. Jim Jordan recently said,

There are four fundamental facts that have never changed, never changed: Mr. Vindman is not the first one we've talked to who has been on the call. We've heard from President Trump and President Zelensky. We've got the transcript. Both President Trump and President Zelensky have said no conditions, no pressure, no pushing, no quid pro quo. We've got the transcript that shows that. We know that the Ukrainians did not know at the time of the call that aid had been withheld and, tell me, what actions the Ukrainians or President Zelensky took to get the aid turned back on.

Did he say he was going to investigate and do certain things? None of that happened. Those four facts have never changed.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethba...facts-n2555546

We also know now that the "whistleblower" had a vested interest in keeping the truth about Ukraine from getting out because he himself was involved in certain questionable activities, which is a game changer.

[Mountain Man]

You are nuts.

Maybe I am, but that doesn't change the fact that there is, to date, no evidence whatsoever that the President committed a crime.