Page 1 of 28 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 406

Thread: Sondland admits quid pro quo

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    tWebber
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Maryland
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    6,468
    Amen (Given)
    386
    Amen (Received)
    1708

    Sondland admits quid pro quo

    And it's official:

    //https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/05/politics/gordon-sondland-kurt-volker-transcripts-impeachment-inquiry/index.html

    Source: cnn

    US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland sent the committee a three-page addition to his testimony on Monday, saying he had remembered a September 1 conversation that occurred on the sidelines of a meeting between Vice President Mike Pence and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, in which he told a top aide to Zelensky that the security aid and investigations were linked.

    © Copyright Original Source

    He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me."

    "So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets"

  2. #2
    tWebber Mountain Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    United States
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    18,494
    Amen (Given)
    5913
    Amen (Received)
    6791
    Let's quote his actual words, shall we?

    "After a large meeting, I now recall speaking individually with Mr. Yermak, where I said that resumption of U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks. I presumed that the aid suspension had become linked to the proposed anticorruption statement..."

    Emphasi mine.

    The first takeaway is that presumptions are not evidence.

    And the second is that this statement implies that he was never directed by the Trump administration to make this proposal.
    Last edited by Mountain Man; 11-05-2019 at 03:50 PM.
    Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
    But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
    Than a fool in the eyes of God


    From "Fools Gold" by Petra

  3. #3
    See, the Thing is... Cow Poke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    57,541
    Amen (Given)
    12477
    Amen (Received)
    26696
    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Man View Post
    Let's quote his actual words, shall we?

    "After a large meeting, I now recall speaking individually with Mr. Yermak, where I said that resumption of U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks. I presumed that the aid suspension had become linked to the proposed anticorruption statement..."

    Emphasi mine.

    The first takeaway is that presumptions are not evidence.

    And the second is that this statement implies that he was never directed by the Trump administration to make this proposal.
    So, lemme get this straight --- he was adamant back then that there was no quid pro quo, and even texted back then that Trump was very angry and said "I want nothing - I want no quid pro quo", but now he "remembers" that he "presumed" there must have been....


    Yeah, rock solid!
    DuckDuckGo - Privacy Simplified

  4. Amen RumTumTugger amen'd this post.
  5. #4
    See, the Thing is... Cow Poke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    57,541
    Amen (Given)
    12477
    Amen (Received)
    26696
    Quote Originally Posted by oxmixmudd View Post
    And it's official:

    //https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/05/politics/gordon-sondland-kurt-volker-transcripts-impeachment-inquiry/index.html

    Source: cnn

    US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland sent the committee a three-page addition to his testimony on Monday, saying he had remembered a September 1 conversation that occurred on the sidelines of a meeting between Vice President Mike Pence and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, in which he told a top aide to Zelensky that the security aid and investigations were linked.

    © Copyright Original Source

    hmmm.jpg

    Maybe this?

    US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland sent the committee a three-page addition to his testimony on Monday,
    Last edited by Cow Poke; 11-05-2019 at 03:27 PM.
    DuckDuckGo - Privacy Simplified

  6. #5
    tWebber Tassman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Sydney/Phuket
    Faith
    Atheist
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    11,627
    Amen (Given)
    2523
    Amen (Received)
    1839
    Yes that's the one, noting especially where it says "Sondland's new testimony, which was included in the public release of his closed-door deposition transcript on Tuesday, adds to Democrats' evidence that the President connected the freezing of US security aid to Ukraine to investigations into Biden as well as the hacking of the Democratic National Committee's servers during the 2016 election, which cuts to the heart of their impeachment case against Trump". Namely where he acknowledges what everyone knows: "a quid pro quo with Ukraine".
    Last edited by Tassman; 11-05-2019 at 10:52 PM.
    “He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.

  7. #6
    See, the Thing is... Cow Poke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    57,541
    Amen (Given)
    12477
    Amen (Received)
    26696
    Quote Originally Posted by Tassman View Post
    Yes that's the one
    DuckDuckGo - Privacy Simplified

  8. #7
    tWebber Mountain Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    United States
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    18,494
    Amen (Given)
    5913
    Amen (Received)
    6791
    Other sketchy statements from Sondland's "corrections" (again, emphasis mine):

    "I always believed that suspending aid to Ukraine was ill-advised, although I did not know (and still do not know) when, why, or by whom the aid was suspended. However, by the beginning of September 2019, and in the absence of any credible explanation for the suspension of aid, I presumed that the aid suspension had become linked to the proposed anti-corruption statement. As I said in my prepared testimony, security aid to Ukraine was in our vital national interest and should not have been delayed for any reason. [This is nothing but his opinion. -MM] And it would have been natural for me to have voiced what I had presumed to Ambassador Taylor, Senator Johnson, the Ukrainians, and Mr. Morrison."

    An awful lot of presuming going on. He also says "it would have been natural" for him to voice his concerns to interested parties, but pay attention to sleight of hand: He never says that he actually voiced his concerns!

    "Soon thereafter, I came to understand [Meaning he wasn't told. -MM] that, in fact, the public statement would need to come directly from President Zelensky himself. I do not specifically recall how I learned this [Again, the implication is that he wasn't told. -MM], but I believe that the information may have come either from Mr. Giuliani or from Ambassador Volkor, who may have discussed this with Mr. Giuliani."

    Remember, any time a witness says "may have", you can substitute "may not have" without changing the meaning of the statement.

    "In a later conversation with Ambassador Taylor, I told him that I had been mistaken about whether a public statement could come from the Prosecutor General; I had come to understand [The implication, again, is that this isn't something he was told. -MM] that the public statement would have to come from President Zelensky himself."

    Now see if you can follow along with this one:

    "Ambassador Taylor recalls that Mr. Morrison told Ambassador Taylor that I told Mr. Morrison that I had conveyed this message to Mr. Yermak..."

    That's like something out of a Marx Bros. skit!

    And on it goes. Taking apart testimony like this is like batting practice for defense attorneys.
    Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
    But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
    Than a fool in the eyes of God


    From "Fools Gold" by Petra

  9. #8
    See, the Thing is... Cow Poke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    57,541
    Amen (Given)
    12477
    Amen (Received)
    26696
    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Man View Post
    And on it goes. Taking apart testimony like this is like batting practice for defense attorneys.
    When you have statements that were made at the time, texts, emails..... vs "oh, yeah, I just remembered".... and, as you point out, the current version is "presumed", not "knew" or "know".
    DuckDuckGo - Privacy Simplified

  10. Amen rogue06, RumTumTugger amen'd this post.
  11. #9
    tWebber Mountain Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    United States
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    18,494
    Amen (Given)
    5913
    Amen (Received)
    6791
    Quote Originally Posted by Cow Poke View Post
    When you have statements that were made at the time, texts, emails..... vs "oh, yeah, I just remembered".... and, as you point out, the current version is "presumed", not "knew" or "know".
    And "I learned" and "I came to believe" as opposed to "I was told".
    Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
    But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
    Than a fool in the eyes of God


    From "Fools Gold" by Petra

  12. #10
    See, the Thing is... Cow Poke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    57,541
    Amen (Given)
    12477
    Amen (Received)
    26696
    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Man View Post
    And "I learned" and "I came to believe" as opposed to "I was told".
    It's always a red flag when a witness changes their testimony without a solid reason.
    DuckDuckGo - Privacy Simplified

  13. Amen Teallaura, RumTumTugger amen'd this post.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •