List of Trump's crimes?

[Cow Poke]

Liberal talking point or not, yes...

See, that's a huge difference between us -- I don't buy the talking points.

[Cow Poke]

No, it has nothing to do with political expediency.

This, alone, demonstrates how woefully naive you are, Jim. It's a political process run by politicians, overseen by an extremely partisan politician, based on whether or not they an get political buy-in from the political allies to remove a politician from political office.

[oxmixmudd]

This, alone, demonstrates how woefully naive you are, Jim. It's a political process run by politicians, overseen by an extremely partisan politician, based on whether or not they an get political buy-in from the political allies to remove a politician from political office.

... with one side doing all they can to gain that "buy in" by revealing the truth about a very corrupt president's deeds, and the other doing all they can to deflect, obfuscate, hide, or dismiss the gravity of his deeds hoping to avoid that "buy in".

[Cow Poke]

... with one side doing all they can to gain that "buy in" by revealing the truth about a very corrupt president's deeds,

Yes, sir, rrom even before Trump was inaugurated.

and the other doing all they can to deflect, obfuscate, hide, or dismiss the gravity of his deeds hoping to avoid that "buy in".

Balderdash. The MSM, the publicity arm of the DNC, won't allow that to happen. It is what it is.

[JimL]

See, that's a huge difference between us -- I don't buy the talking points.

Talking points are either true or false, CP. So, yes, you either buy into them them or you don't based on whether you are in agreement with them or not. Stop being dopey!

[JimL]

This, alone, demonstrates how woefully naive you are, Jim. It's a political process run by politicians, overseen by an extremely partisan politician, based on whether or not they an get political buy-in from the political allies to remove a politician from political office.

Should Congressional oversight even be a thing, CP? If so, why?

[Mountain Man]

... with one side doing all they can to gain that "buy in" by revealing the truth about a very corrupt president's deeds, and the other doing all they can to deflect, obfuscate, hide, or dismiss the gravity of his deeds hoping to avoid that "buy in".

I honestly can't tell if you really believe this nonsense, or if you're just trolling to get a reaction.

[JimL]

I honestly can't tell if you really believe this nonsense, or if you're just trolling to get a reaction.

I can hardly believe, but can honestly tell, that you really are as dumbfounded as you seem to be, Ollie.

[Mountain Man]

I can hardly believe, but can honestly tell, that you really are as dumbfounded as you seem to be, Ollie.

Now you, on the other hand, I have no trouble believing that you really are dumb enough to believe most of the nonsense you post.

[JimL]

Now you, on the other hand, I have no trouble believing that you really are wise enough to believe most of the truth you post.

True.

[Cow Poke]

Should Congressional oversight even be a thing, CP?

When done for the right reason, absolutely.

If so, why?

Because.

[Cow Poke]

Talking points are either true or false, CP. So, yes, you either buy into them them or you don't based on whether you are in agreement with them or not.

"talking points", by design, are intended to be rather selective with facts, and may or may not be true, but are presented for a purpose.

Stop being dopey!

And, here, I thought you were improving.

[Mountain Man]

True.

This coming from the guy who still hasn't figured out that Rachael Maddow lied to him about Russian collusion.

[JimL]

When done for the right reason, absolutely.

So, if it's done for the right reason, it isn't strictly political, i.e. done for strictly political reasons, is it?

Because.

Because why?

[Mountain Man]

When done for the right reason, absolutely.

Democrats are making a good case for severely curtailing Congressional oversight.