Page 10 of 21 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 207

Thread: Schiff Targets Political Rival, Journalist

  1. #91
    See, the Thing is... Cow Poke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    59,466
    Amen (Given)
    12851
    Amen (Received)
    27364
    Quote Originally Posted by JimL View Post
    What about it? How is that "calling Schiff out?"
    I'm not the least surprised you can't understand the article.
    "Neighbor, how long has it been since you’ve had a big, thick, steaming bowl of Wolf Brand Chili?”

  2. Amen NorrinRadd amen'd this post.
  3. #92
    radical strawberry
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Humanist
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    3,692
    Amen (Given)
    509
    Amen (Received)
    1110
    Quote Originally Posted by Cow Poke View Post
    I'm not the least surprised you can't understand the article.
    Would that be this bit ...

    the outlines of a C.I.A. officer’s concerns

    Or this bit ...

    In both cases, the original accusation was vague.

    Because from where I'm sitting, the mouth-breather on that article is, well, you.


    Sam goes to the trouble of detailing how accusations are simply not true, with a heavy aside of "this is your brain on partisan hackery" ... and the unanimous response is ranging from "no, you," to more partisan hackery, as if a heavy enough counter-accusation, repeatedly frequently enough, will somehow make the facts go away, or provide an excuse for the hackery.

    Nope.

    And nope.

    I'm jaw-agape at the slack-jaw here.

    So here we are, spinning wheels like we're in a YEC debate with magellan, trying to get some agreement on basic facts, when we should be asking penetrating questions, like, well, why did Trump actually stop the military aid to Ukraine to begin with ... and why is Zelensky still waiting for that White House visit.

    Do y'all even news?

    The entire administration and both sides of congress want unambiguous support for Ukraine against Russia. With the minor exception of Trump himself.

    Best case would be if he was merely planning to use the security assistance as leverage to coerce Zelensky into corrupting his own justice system. There's no ambiguity in Trump's endorsement of Shokin in that call, or that he was pushing the Russian deflection conspiracy.

    In case y'all missed it, here it is again, in a nutshell.

    Input: Biden demanded Shokin be removed because he was shaking down oligarchs instead of investigating them.
    Output: Biden demanded Shokin be removed to prevent him from investigating an oligarch.

    The oligarchs are aligned with Russia. All of them.

    All of these roads lead back to Putin.

    That was the best case, which suffers from the fact no public, (or private, so far as we known, even inside the irregular channel) announcement was ever made about conditions for releasing the military aid. There is, as far as I can tell, no counter to the argument Trump intended to cancel the military aid to Ukraine on the sly in support of his private policy of shifting our alignment from Ukraine to Russia.

    There's a reason prominent Ukrainians were weighing in against this guy. This last is consistent with all of Trump's public positions from the time he was a candidate, signaling green on Russia's military conquest of Crimea.

  4. #93
    Evolution is God's ID rogue06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Southeastern U.S. of A.
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    55,516
    Amen (Given)
    1171
    Amen (Received)
    20459
    Quote Originally Posted by Cow Poke View Post
    Even the NYTimes calls Schiff out on this....

    Schiff Got Early Account of Accusations as Whistle-Blower’s Concerns Grew

    WASHINGTON — The Democratic head of the House Intelligence Committee, Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, learned about the outlines of a C.I.A. officer’s concerns that President Trump had abused his power days before the officer filed a whistle-blower complaint, according to a spokesman and current and former American officials.

    The early account by the future whistle-blower shows how determined he was to make known his allegations that Mr. Trump asked Ukraine’s government to interfere on his behalf in the 2020 election. It also explains how Mr. Schiff knew to press for the complaint when the Trump administration initially blocked lawmakers from seeing it.

    The C.I.A. officer approached a House Intelligence Committee aide with his concerns about Mr. Trump only after he had had a colleague first convey them to the C.I.A.’s top lawyer. Concerned about how that initial avenue for airing his allegations through the C.I.A. was unfolding, the officer then approached the House aide. In both cases, the original accusation was vague.
    Keep in mind you're talking to folks who still maintain that the Mueller Reports shows that Trump colluded with Putin smiley dolt.gif

    I'm always still in trouble again

    "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
    "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

  5. Amen NorrinRadd, RumTumTugger amen'd this post.
  6. #94
    Evolution is God's ID rogue06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Southeastern U.S. of A.
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    55,516
    Amen (Given)
    1171
    Amen (Received)
    20459
    Quote Originally Posted by Juvenal View Post



    The entire administration and both sides of congress want unambiguous support for Ukraine against Russia. With the minor exception of Trump himself.
    When exactly did the Democrats start giving a rat's... whisker about helping the Ukraine against Russia? They certainly didn't give a hoot all through the Obama Administration when they utterly refused to equip them with military aide and instead sent blankets and stuff. I guess they could use them to wrap their dead or something.

    No. The Democrats now only "care" because they see them as a tool to exploit and use in their never-ending TDS-fueled jihad against Trump.

    I'm always still in trouble again

    "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
    "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

  7. Amen RumTumTugger amen'd this post.
  8. #95
    tWebber
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Agnostic
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    15,539
    Amen (Given)
    1912
    Amen (Received)
    1588
    Quote Originally Posted by Cow Poke View Post
    I'm not the least surprised you can't understand the article.
    I'm not the least bit surprised you can't answer the question and once again turn to the ad hominum attack tactic.

  9. #96
    See, the Thing is... Cow Poke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    59,466
    Amen (Given)
    12851
    Amen (Received)
    27364
    Quote Originally Posted by JimL View Post
    I'm not the least bit surprised you can't answer the question and once again turn to the ad hominum attack tactic.
    Charles!!!! You've hijacked Jim's account?!?!?!
    "Neighbor, how long has it been since you’ve had a big, thick, steaming bowl of Wolf Brand Chili?”

  10. #97
    See, the Thing is... Cow Poke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    59,466
    Amen (Given)
    12851
    Amen (Received)
    27364


    Quote Originally Posted by JimL View Post
    ...once again turn to the ad hominum attack tactic.


    You can't make this stuff up!
    "Neighbor, how long has it been since you’ve had a big, thick, steaming bowl of Wolf Brand Chili?”

  11. #98
    tWebber
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    3,949
    Amen (Given)
    159
    Amen (Received)
    756
    Quote Originally Posted by rogue06 View Post
    When exactly did the Democrats start giving a rat's... whisker about helping the Ukraine against Russia? They certainly didn't give a hoot all through the Obama Administration when they utterly refused to equip them with military aide and instead sent blankets and stuff. I guess they could use them to wrap their dead or something.

    No. The Democrats now only "care" because they see them as a tool to exploit and use in their never-ending TDS-fueled jihad against Trump.
    Congress passed bipartisan security aid for Ukraine during Obama's term, allocating over $100 million in military and medical equipment. The Obama administration signed the package into law and provided that aid to Ukraine. Many Democrats (like Biden) advocated for the extension of "lethal aid", including Javelin missiles, but lost the argument (rightly, I think) about the whether lethal aid was the best way to contain Russian aggression in 2015 & 2016.

    Whether a hypothetical third Obama administration would have shifted gears and provided lethal aid after 2016 is, of course, unknowable. We do know that Trump lent support to Putin's annexation of Crimea in 2016 and that his NSA, Michael Flynn, was assuring Russian officials that unrelated Obama-era sanctions would be lifted while he, Micheal Cohen, Felix Sater, and others were secretly working on a "Ukraine peace plan" that would lift Russian sanctions related to Crimea and cede the peninsula to Russia. So Trump is pursuing a military aide plan that many Republicans and Democrats alike advocated (just look at the appropriations votes for military aid) while simultaneously being far more Putin-friendly than Democrats, including Obama, ever were.

    And if Trump's supposed to get credit for supplying lethal military aid to Ukraine, one would think people would be upset that he mysteriously halted disbursement of that aid for months while he and his political appointees tried to pressure Ukraine into public announcements that they were investigating a non-existent DNC/Crowdstrike server in Ukraine and Trump's leading political opponent.

    --Sam
    Last edited by Sam; 12-08-2019 at 03:01 PM.
    "I wonder about the trees. / Why do we wish to bear / Forever the noise of these / More than another noise / So close to our dwelling place?" — Robert Frost, "The Sound of Trees"


  12. Amen JimL amen'd this post.
  13. #99
    Evolution is God's ID rogue06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Southeastern U.S. of A.
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    55,516
    Amen (Given)
    1171
    Amen (Received)
    20459
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam View Post
    Congress passed bipartisan security aid for Ukraine during Obama's term, allocating over $100 million in military and medical equipment. The Obama administration signed the package into law and provided that aid to Ukraine. Many Democrats (like Biden) advocated for the extension of "lethal aid", including Javelin missiles, but lost the argument (rightly, I think) about the whether lethal aid was the best way to contain Russian aggression in 2015 & 2016.

    Whether a hypothetical third Obama administration would have shifted gears and provided lethal aid after 2016 is, of course, unknowable. We do know that Trump lent support to Putin's annexation of Crimea in 2016 and that his NSA, Michael Flynn, was assuring Russian officials that unrelated Obama-era sanctions would be lifted while he, Micheal Cohen, Felix Sater, and others were secretly working on a "Ukraine peace plan" that would lift Russian sanctions related to Crimea and cede the peninsula to Russia. So Trump is pursuing a military aide plan that many Republicans and Democrats alike advocated (just look at the appropriations votes for military aid) while simultaneously being far more Putin-friendly than Democrats, including Obama, ever were.

    And if Trump's supposed to get credit for supplying lethal military aid to Ukraine, one would think people would be upset that he mysteriously halted disbursement of that aid for months while he and his political appointees tried to pressure Ukraine into public announcements that they were investigating a non-existent DNC/Crowdstrike server in Ukraine and Trump's leading political opponent.

    --Sam
    The military aid was all in a defensive nature with no offensive weapons -- which was what they were begging for.

    I'm always still in trouble again

    "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
    "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

  14. Amen RumTumTugger, NorrinRadd amen'd this post.
  15. #100
    tWebber
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    3,949
    Amen (Given)
    159
    Amen (Received)
    756
    Quote Originally Posted by rogue06 View Post
    The military aid was all in a defensive nature with no offensive weapons -- which was what they were begging for.

    Which is materially distinct from "blankets and stuff" (drones, military radar, armored vehicles) and still counters your rhetorical accusation that Democratic politicians in Congress and the White House didn't care about Ukraine until it became an anti-Trump foil.

    A person can argue that military aid to Ukraine should have included lethal aid from the beginning; that's a complicated policy discussion where noble men can differ. But when you start talking nonsense, pulling stuff out of your whiskers to make accusations that are contrary to fact and sense, you're no longer taking part in a noble discussion ... or even any discussion, really. You're just grumbling. And there's a real danger, to use CS Lewis' imagery, of getting to a place where you're not even a grumbler anymore, becoming merely a grumble. And a grumble can't be reasoned with or moved or brought to Joy.

    --Sam
    "I wonder about the trees. / Why do we wish to bear / Forever the noise of these / More than another noise / So close to our dwelling place?" — Robert Frost, "The Sound of Trees"


  16. Amen JimL amen'd this post.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •