Originally posted by Tassman
View Post
Science investigates extrinsic, third-person repeatable phenomena that are generally spatial and mathematically analyzable. It investigates properties that have structural, relational expression. It is best-suited to investigate phenomena in terms of their structure and their dynamics.
Science can also “uncover new conceptual facts about the world, new hitherto undiscovered entailments and implications” but, unlike philosophy, it can test their veracity via experimentation. Or, are you suggesting that philosophy exists in a vacuum?
No, YOU are the one implying that there’s more than the natural world so, what can that “more” be if not ‘super-natural’?
Comment