The conspiracy to harm Marie Yovanovitch

[Sparko]

[DivineOb]

By whom?

What answer do you think I'm going to give?

[rogue06]

Charles, do you really honestly claim that you are an equal opportunity "corrector"?

If he wasn't then all he'd have to do is point to one instance where he chided both sides instead of merely saying "nuh-uh."

[Charles]

If he wasn't then all he'd have to do is point to one instance where he chided both sides instead of merely saying "nuh-uh."

Feel free to adress my actual points (if you can). The ad hominem whataboutism is getting really old...

[Cow Poke]

What answer do you think I'm going to give?

Would it be to much to ask just to give the answer?

[Ronson]

Were those FBI agents cleared of wrongdoing?

The ones that were fired?

[Cow Poke]

If he wasn't then all he'd have to do is point to one instance where he chided both sides instead of merely saying "nuh-uh."

Even as I'm asking the question, he jumps in to take up for "one side", then falls back on "y'all are pickin' on me".

[Sam]

The ones that were fired?

Both Lisa Page and Peter Stzrock, I believe, are in the process of wrongful termination suits.

--Sam

[DivineOb]

Would it be to much to ask just to give the answer?

Of course not. I just assumed you would guess that I was going to post about the recent IG report these (MarketWatch).

A Justice Department inspector general’s report released Monday says the Federal Bureau of Investigation was justified in opening its probe into ties between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and Russia and didn’t act with political bias.

[Ronson]

Both Lisa Page and Peter Stzrock, I believe, are in the process of wrongful termination suits.

Which they will lose. Both were using government equipment to communicate their personal love affair.

It's funny that if they did win, we'd lose. They just suck up more tax dollars.

[Cow Poke]

Both Lisa Page and Peter Stzrock, I believe, are in the process of wrongful termination suits.

--Sam

I think you're wrong. Stzrock is suing for wrongful termination, but Page is suing because the FBI and DOJ released copies of her texts and emails.

[Sam]

Which they will lose. Both were using government equipment to communicate their personal love affair.

It's funny that if they did win, we'd lose. They just suck up more tax dollars.

Both will likely win or settle out, partially because there's documentary evidence of pro-Trump FBI agents making the same sort of talk without similar reprisal, even the demotion that Stzrock (by memory) doesn't object to.

--Sam

[Sam]

I think you're wrong. Stzrock is suing for wrongful termination, but Page is suing because the FBI and DOJ released copies of her texts and emails.

Thanks; couldn't remember the details of Page's lawsuit.

--Sam

[Cow Poke]

Of course not. I just assumed you would guess that I was going to post about the recent IG report these (MarketWatch).

I'd actually prefer not to guess - which is why I like to ask. Others have a tendency to ASSUME.

A Justice Department inspector general’s report released Monday says the Federal Bureau of Investigation was justified in opening its probe into ties between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and Russia and didn’t act with political bias.

Yeah, that doesn't clear them of wrongdoing.

[Cow Poke]

Of course not. I just assumed you would guess that I was going to post about the recent IG report these (MarketWatch).

A Justice Department inspector general’s report released Monday says the Federal Bureau of Investigation was justified in opening its probe into ties between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and Russia and didn’t act with political bias.

And I think it's been argued back and forth that there's a difference between saying that there was no proof found of actual bias, and that there was "no bias". Kinda like the "17 errors" admission where 100% of the "errors" were against Trump's interests.