The Impeachment Trial

[JimL]

If Vindman wasn't too cowardly to blow the whistle himself then he should have worked within his chain of command, not leaked privileged information to an unauthorized third-party. Trump has every right, one might even say moral obligation to remove an admitted leaker from the White House.

Vindman testified under oath that he never leaked the call to anyone outside the chain of command. He spoke to two people within the chain of command, two people with "the need to know" one being George Kent and the other not revealed by instruction of his attorney. You are merely speculating.

[Mountain Man]

Vindman testified under oath that he never leaked the call to anyone outside the chain of command. He spoke to two people within the chain of command, two people with "the need to know" one being George Kent and the other not revealed by instruction of his attorney. You are merely speculating.

The second was Eric Ciaramella who is clearly not in Traitor Vindman's chain of command. He also lied under oath when he said he didn't know the identity of the whistle blower.

[JimL]

The second was Eric Ciaramella who is clearly not in Traitor Vindman's chain of command. He also lied under oath when he said he didn't know the identity of the whistle blower.

Like I said, you're speculating and Vindman testified under oath to the contrary. So, carry on with your speculation.

[Mountain Man]

Like I said, you're speculating and Vindman testified under oath to the contrary. So, carry on with your speculation.

Nope. We know who the whistle blower is, and we know Vindman leaked to him.

https://www.realclearinvestigations....er_120996.html

[firstfloor]

Nope. We know who the whistle blower is, and we know Vindman leaked to him.

https://www.realclearinvestigations....er_120996.html

No you don’t; that is pure right wing nutter conspiracy theory. There is zero evidence in your favour.

[rogue06]

Nope. We know who the whistle blower is, and we know Vindman leaked to him.

https://www.realclearinvestigations....er_120996.html

Yup. Schiff's committee accidentally released some testimony without his name being redacted.

[firstfloor]

Yup. Schiff's committee accidentally released some testimony without his name being redacted.

The conspiracy theory is that Vindman leaked classified information in violation of the espionage act. The advice being given by respectable lawyers to those who hold that view is prove it or shut up.

[Mountain Man]

The conspiracy theory is that Vindman leaked classified information in violation of the espionage act. The advice being given by respectable lawyers to those who hold that view is prove it or shut up.

You know, there's a reason the Democrats were deadset against having Ciarmella testify.

[JimL]

You know, there's a reason the Democrats were deadset against having Ciarmella testify.

You know, there is a reason that people like you were deadset against having witnesses testify at the Senate trial, including witnesses for the defense. There is no evidence that Ciaramella was the whistleblower other than the assertions of right wing pundits, but they could have subpoenaed him to testify at trial to clear that whole issue up, yet they refused to do so. And those of us who aren't blinded by our bias know why that is.

[JimL]

Yup. Schiff's committee accidentally released some testimony without his name being redacted.

What testimony woulod that be exactly?

[Mountain Man]

You know, there is a reason that people like you were deadset against having witnesses testify at the Senate trial...

What are you talking about? I would have loved to have seen Shifty Schiff, Quid Pro Joe, Hunter, and Ciarmella grilled by Trump's all-star defense team. What would have been bigger, Schiff's eyes bugging out of his head, or the sweat rolling down his face?

But it's a moot point since the House managers failed to convinced a majority of Senators that more evidence was needed to render a verdict of not guilty.

[One Bad Pig]

What a pathetic response.

Exactly what your post deserved.

[JimL]

What are you talking about? I would have loved to have seen Shifty Schiff, Quid Pro Joe, Hunter, and Ciarmella grilled by Trump's all-star defense team. What would have been bigger, Schiff's eyes bugging out of his head, or the sweat rolling down his face?

But it's a moot point since the House managers failed to convinced a majority of Senators that more evidence was needed to render a verdict of not guilty.

House Managers argued for witnesses, republicans denied witnesses-case closed. Republicans didn't want the truth to come out for their naive constituents (that's you) to see, and so they made certain that you didn't see.

[firstfloor]

Andrew McCabe will not be charged.
What a Trumpian witch hunt (for real) that was!
May God bless Andrew McCabe.

[Tassman]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]42777[/ATTACH]
Keep squawking.

The electorate is listening.