Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Is web scraping ok?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by One Bad Pig View Post
    His rum. And his bacon.
    certain not all of his marbles.

    I'm always still in trouble again

    "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
    "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
    "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

    Comment


    • #17
      Stuff like this tells us where we are on the road to disaster. Feel free to touch the brakes.
      The Colorado River’s average annual flow has declined by nearly 20 percent compared to the last century, and researchers have identified one of the main culprits: climate change is causing mountain snowpack to disappear, leading to increased evaporation.
      https://www.washingtonpost.com/clima...t-vital-river/
      “I think God, in creating man, somewhat overestimated his ability.” ― Oscar Wilde
      “And if there were a God, I think it very unlikely that He would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt His existence” ― Bertrand Russell
      “not all there” - you know who you are

      Comment


      • #18
        From the transcript:
        Kashmir Hill
        So I’ve been covering privacy for 10 years, and I know that a technology like this in public hands is the nightmare scenario.

        [Music]
        This has been a tool that was too taboo for Silicon Valley giants who were capable of building it. Google in 2011 said that they could release a tool like this, but it was the one technology they were holding back because it could be used in a very bad way.

        Annie Brown
        And why exactly is this kind of technology this line in the sand that no one will cross? What makes it so dangerous?

        Kashmir Hill
        So imagine this technology in public hands. It would mean that if you were at a bar and someone saw you and was interested in you, they could take your photo, run your face through the app, and then it pulls up all these photos of you from the internet. It probably takes them back to your Facebook page. So now they know your name, they know who you’re friends with, they can Google your name, they can see where you live, where you work, maybe how much money you make. Let’s say you’re a parent and you’re walking down the street with your three-year-old. Somebody can take a photo of you and know where the two of you live. Imagine you’re a protester in the U.S. or in a more authoritarian regime. All of a sudden they know everything about you, and you can face repercussions for just trying to exercise your political opinions. If this app were made publicly available, it would be the end of being anonymous in public. You would have to assume anyone can know who you are any time they’re able to take a photo of your face.

        This thing is a stalker's wet dream, and the tech needed to build it is off-the-shelf. If China didn't have it before it hit the NY Times, it does now.

        This guy is barely a nerd, with a programming background as deep as needed to build a facebook app to add Trump's hair to your profile pic. Add a pic webscraper to an AI learning algorithm, and this will pop out. It doesn't need full face profiles. It doesn't need high res. And it's got VC backers who want to release it to the public, big guys, like Peter Thiel, the guy who backed Hulk Hogan in taking down Gawker.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Juvenal View Post
          From the transcript:
          Kashmir Hill
          So I’ve been covering privacy for 10 years, and I know that a technology like this in public hands is the nightmare scenario.

          [Music]
          This has been a tool that was too taboo for Silicon Valley giants who were capable of building it. Google in 2011 said that they could release a tool like this, but it was the one technology they were holding back because it could be used in a very bad way.

          Annie Brown
          And why exactly is this kind of technology this line in the sand that no one will cross? What makes it so dangerous?

          Kashmir Hill
          So imagine this technology in public hands. It would mean that if you were at a bar and someone saw you and was interested in you, they could take your photo, run your face through the app, and then it pulls up all these photos of you from the internet. It probably takes them back to your Facebook page. So now they know your name, they know who you’re friends with, they can Google your name, they can see where you live, where you work, maybe how much money you make. Let’s say you’re a parent and you’re walking down the street with your three-year-old. Somebody can take a photo of you and know where the two of you live. Imagine you’re a protester in the U.S. or in a more authoritarian regime. All of a sudden they know everything about you, and you can face repercussions for just trying to exercise your political opinions. If this app were made publicly available, it would be the end of being anonymous in public. You would have to assume anyone can know who you are any time they’re able to take a photo of your face.

          This thing is a stalker's wet dream, and the tech needed to build it is off-the-shelf. If China didn't have it before it hit the NY Times, it does now.

          This guy is barely a nerd, with a programming background as deep as needed to build a facebook app to add Trump's hair to your profile pic. Add a pic webscraper to an AI learning algorithm, and this will pop out. It doesn't need full face profiles. It doesn't need high res. And it's got VC backers who want to release it to the public, big guys, like Peter Thiel, the guy who backed Hulk Hogan in taking down Gawker.
          The really scary thing is you can pretty much do this now, albeit without the facial recognition. You can buy background checks on people, All you need is a name or email address. It will come back with their address, previous addresses, relatives, any arrests, social media links, etc.

          And most people are idiots when it comes to security. Rather than locking down their facebook/instagram pages so only friends can view their posts (or even a list of their friends) people post everything to "public" even their most private stuff. Not sure if it is because they are just ignorant, or because they want to be famous and go viral with one of their posts or videos.

          Comment

          Related Threads

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by carpedm9587, Yesterday, 02:07 PM
          44 responses
          244 views
          2 likes
          Last Post seer
          by seer
           
          Started by Starlight, Yesterday, 12:34 AM
          11 responses
          86 views
          2 likes
          Last Post rogue06
          by rogue06
           
          Started by carpedm9587, 04-13-2024, 07:51 PM
          31 responses
          177 views
          0 likes
          Last Post rogue06
          by rogue06
           
          Started by Juvenal, 04-13-2024, 04:39 PM
          42 responses
          302 views
          0 likes
          Last Post Starlight  
          Started by carpedm9587, 04-12-2024, 01:47 PM
          165 responses
          782 views
          1 like
          Last Post Sam
          by Sam
           
          Working...
          X