This is an interesting article that does report an interesting fossil discovery that contributes to our knowledge of the evolution of mammals, but it is a layman's article that makes a lot of mistakes making unscientific claims concerning the importance of the discovery in terms of what is falsified and demonstrated concerning the advancement of our knowledge of evolution.
The most important flaws are: (!) Nothing is proven in science much less evolution. Evolution is indeed falsified beyond any reasonable doubt based on the current available evidence. (2) I do not believe that this discovery makes a significant contribution to 'Her research could now be used to predict which species conservationists should focus on protecting to stop them becoming endangered or extinct.' (3) The terminology is poor describing the importance of the discovery.
The most important flaws are: (!) Nothing is proven in science much less evolution. Evolution is indeed falsified beyond any reasonable doubt based on the current available evidence. (2) I do not believe that this discovery makes a significant contribution to 'Her research could now be used to predict which species conservationists should focus on protecting to stop them becoming endangered or extinct.' (3) The terminology is poor describing the importance of the discovery.
Comment