Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: Hospitals considering universal DNR for covid patients.

  1. #11
    tWebber
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Glasgow, UK
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    107
    Amen (Given)
    140
    Amen (Received)
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by demi-conservative View Post
    The doctors's welfare is equivalent to patients's. Many many doctors are not allowed to work because they test positive for the virus, meaning less and poorer treatment available for patients as the remaining doctors are overworked even more.
    I have disagreed strongly with demi recently, but here he has a point. Doctors are dying from covid, and a dead doctor aint gonna be very good at treating patients. It's the responsibility of the government and healthcare provider to ensure staff have effective PPE to ensure their safety as best as possible.

  2. #12
    Troll Magnet Sparko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    53,816
    Amen (Given)
    5489
    Amen (Received)
    23650
    Quote Originally Posted by JimboJSR View Post
    I have disagreed strongly with demi recently, but here he has a point. Doctors are dying from covid, and a dead doctor aint gonna be very good at treating patients. It's the responsibility of the government and healthcare provider to ensure staff have effective PPE to ensure their safety as best as possible.
    read the article. They have the PPE but say they don't have time to put it on before going in for the code. I would think they would have people in an ICU already suited up since they have to check on their patients fairly often. Sounds like a "likely excuse" to me.

  3. #13
    tWebber
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Glasgow, UK
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    107
    Amen (Given)
    140
    Amen (Received)
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparko View Post
    read the article. They have the PPE but say they don't have time to put it on before going in for the code. I would think they would have people in an ICU already suited up since they have to check on their patients fairly often. Sounds like a "likely excuse" to me.
    That's odd. In our hospital, if someone arrested we would put on full PPE and then go in. It would delay onset of CPR, which would reduce the chance the patient would survive (frankly, someone who has a cardiac arrest because of covid has a very low chance of leaving hospital alive anyway), but we would (a) still protect the healthcare worker, and (b) still do CPR if it was clinically appropriate.
    ...because every forum needs a Jimbo

  4. #14
    Troll Magnet Sparko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    53,816
    Amen (Given)
    5489
    Amen (Received)
    23650
    Quote Originally Posted by JimboJSR View Post
    That's odd. In our hospital, if someone arrested we would put on full PPE and then go in. It would delay onset of CPR, which would reduce the chance the patient would survive (frankly, someone who has a cardiac arrest because of covid has a very low chance of leaving hospital alive anyway), but we would (a) still protect the healthcare worker, and (b) still do CPR if it was clinically appropriate.
    yeah, but you wouldn't just go, "well he is just gonna die" and DNR him. that's what bugs me.

  5. #15
    tWebber demi-conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    4,273
    Amen (Given)
    172
    Amen (Received)
    585
    Sparko, do you remember how the CDC and Surgeon General of the USA lied by saying that masks are useless? This is probably also a lie for the same reason, not enough PPE.
    Remember that you are dust and to dust you shall return.

  6. #16
    tWebber
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Agnostic
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    17,196
    Amen (Given)
    2136
    Amen (Received)
    1684
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparko View Post
    This is terrible.

    If you have a heart attack or something in the hospital, they are now talking about just letting you die, no matter what you or your family want.

    Sounds like another taste of what socialized medicine would be like.

    -------
    Hospitals consider do-not-resuscitate order for all COVID-19 patients

    Some hospitals are considering do-not-resuscitate orders for all COVID-19 patients, citing the high exposure risk for staff as protective equipment supplies run low, The Washington Post reports.

    Chicago-based Northwestern Memorial Hospital is currently discussing a universal DNR policy for COVID-19 patients, regardless of patient or family wishes. Hospital administrators have asked Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker to clarify if state law would allow such policy changes.
    https://www.beckershospitalreview.co...-patients.html
    ---------
    I doubt that medical professionals would comply with such an order which goes against their oath.

  7. #17
    tWebber
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Glasgow, UK
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    107
    Amen (Given)
    140
    Amen (Received)
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by JimL View Post
    I doubt that medical professionals would comply with such an order which goes against their oath.
    It's more complicated than that. Our first duty is "do no harm", and an inevitably futile attempt at CPR is usually regarded as harmful - its brutal, undignified, anf and usually distressing for family and observers (not to mention the patient, to whatever extent they are aware of what's going on). I can't speak for covid, but there are many instances where we would not perform CPR even if a patient wanted us to - these are when the chances of CPR being successful are extremely low (which, sadly, is very often the case).

  8. #18
    tWebber
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Agnostic
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    17,196
    Amen (Given)
    2136
    Amen (Received)
    1684
    Quote Originally Posted by JimboJSR View Post
    It's more complicated than that. Our first duty is "do no harm", and an inevitably futile attempt at CPR is usually regarded as harmful - its brutal, undignified, anf and usually distressing for family and observers (not to mention the patient, to whatever extent they are aware of what's going on). I can't speak for covid, but there are many instances where we would not perform CPR even if a patient wanted us to - these are when the chances of CPR being successful are extremely low (which, sadly, is very often the case).
    I understand that CPR is often futile, more often than not it is futile, but one never knows if an attempted resuscitation is futile or not until it is. Harmful, brutal or undignified have nothing to do with whether or not to perform CPR.
    Last edited by JimL; 03-29-2020 at 04:45 PM.

  9. Amen Sparko amen'd this post.
  10. #19
    Troll Magnet Sparko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    53,816
    Amen (Given)
    5489
    Amen (Received)
    23650
    Quote Originally Posted by JimL View Post
    I doubt that medical professionals would comply with such an order which goes against their oath.
    I would hope so, but read the article.

  11. #20
    tWebber
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Glasgow, UK
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    107
    Amen (Given)
    140
    Amen (Received)
    56
    I read the article. There are a few separate issues here. Please note I'm a conservative (by british standards) christian, pro-life and anti-euthanasia or assisted-suicide. However I've also looked after a lot of criticially ill people, participated in many CPR scenarios, and seen many successful and unsuccessful outcomes.

    Quote Originally Posted by JimL View Post
    I understand that CPR is often futile, more often than not it is futile, but one never knows if an attempted resuscitation is futile or not until it is.
    Er... we kinda do.

    1) We have decades of experience with CPR, and we have good predictors of success or failure. From the beginning, CPR has a low level of success.
    Additionally, the evidence so far seems to be that, if your Covid infection is severe enough to cause cardiac arrest, your chances of leaving hospital alive are smaller still. Finally, one of the strongest influences on the success of CPR is the speed and quality of chest compressions - any delay in starting CPR following cardiac arrest, and survival rates drop precipitously. Put all three together, and I can completely understand the hospital's reasoning. Rolling out this policy to EVERY patient I think is too much - for example, even in this scenario, a 30 year old would have some chance of survival, abeit a small one, whilst a 70 year old is likely beyond our help - but the decision making process is basically sound. That's why the article quotes medical staff:

    "By the time you get all gowned up and double-gloved the patient is going to be dead," Fred Wyese, RN, an ICU nurse in Muskegon, Mich., said. "We are going to be coding dead people."
    We've seen this. Lots and lots of times. We have a decent idea of what work and what doesn't, and medical / nursing staff tend to be much more realistic in the odds of CPR success than the public.

    2) Another factor is the safety of hospital staff. CPR is a aerosol-generating procedure and carries a high risk of infecting medical staff, unless full PPE is worn. Commencement of CPR will inevitably be delayed as staff done PPE. If full PPE is not available, are your eally going to ask docs and nurses to risk their own life by not protecting themselves? This brings the hospital to consider what would happen if they are running low on PPE - do they use up precious equipment to do something with is almost certainly not going to get a heartbeat back and even less likely to result in the patient acually leaving hospital alive? Because if they run out of kit smashing up the ribs of a 70-year old corpse, they then have nothing to use when the 30-year old comes in, who really does need their help and has a much higher chance of benefitting from it.

    3) Going against patient's / relatives' wishes. I'm not sure what the legal situation is in the USA. Here, CPR is a medical procedure. As doctors, we are not obligated to offer a medical procedure simply because the patient wants it. My day job is in rheumatology. Recently a patient with osteoarthritis (wear and tear) in their joints came into my clinic. They had heard about a famous drug called Humira (it's an anti-arthritis drug - in fact, the biggst-grossing drug in history) and watned to try it. I said no, because Humira works by suppressing the immune system in inflammatory arthritis; OA isn't an inflammatory condition, and we have plenty of scientific rational and clinical experience to tell us that Humira doesn't work in OA. If I think a medication is not going to provide benefit, I'm not obliged to prescribe it - in fact, it would be highly unethical of me to do so. The same principle holds for CPR - if it's gonna work, then let's talk about it; if the evidence shows that it's very unlikely to help, then it's pointless and unethical, no matter how much a patient might ask. Of course these decisions can be hard, and we should discuss and inform the patient - but that's different to asking their permission.
    ...because every forum needs a Jimbo

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •