It is not overall safer. The effect on the economy will be more devasting than we can imagine. We can have many more people going to work. We can have restaurants accommodating sit-in dining while having social distancing. We can have church gatherings where people social distance themselves --at least in some 80% or so of churches. The mega churches might have to just have the smaller gatherings but spread these out across more of the week. And I say this with the assumption of the scare numbers that the media promotes -- but we may just be in a severe-flu-type scenario. Right now we are just hearing the loudest voices, as selected by the mainstream news.
We have seen university students sent back to their hometowns which then has meant these students are introduced to multiple areas where they could spread or share the virus. The best option often would have been to leave most of the students (at least in low population universities) in place to finish the online/video version of their classes on campus.
Maybe we will get some good results out of the lockdown. Maybe families will start homeschooling their children so that we will have much smarter youth. But, this should not be by heavy-handed rule of govenors, especially those who already dislike Christians and Christianity.
We have seen university students sent back to their hometowns which then has meant these students are introduced to multiple areas where they could spread or share the virus. The best option often would have been to leave most of the students (at least in low population universities) in place to finish the online/video version of their classes on campus.
Maybe we will get some good results out of the lockdown. Maybe families will start homeschooling their children so that we will have much smarter youth. But, this should not be by heavy-handed rule of govenors, especially those who already dislike Christians and Christianity.
Comment