I'm curious as to whether the response from the Trump supporters here leans more toward:
1. "This section of the constitution hasn't historically been very relevant because the Presidents weren't from an international business background. This section wasn't designed with someone like Trump in mind, and is too onerous on a modern businessman, and it's unreasonable to expect Trump to follow it, and it should be discarded as a historic relic. Possibly an amendment should be passed to formally remove this provision."
or
2. "Trump knows what he's doing. I believe in him. His lawyers will have made sure his business dealings are fully legal and constitutional. Because I believe that Trump will have adhered to the law and constitution, I believe there will be no case here."
or possibly,
3. "Without knowing anything much about this historical part of the constitution nor having any particular opinion on Trump's business dealings, I'm used to political parties doing fishing expeditions. I believe this to be just the latest political fishing expedition. This must just be the latest version of Dems being mad they didn't win the election. So I assume there's no merits to it."
1. "This section of the constitution hasn't historically been very relevant because the Presidents weren't from an international business background. This section wasn't designed with someone like Trump in mind, and is too onerous on a modern businessman, and it's unreasonable to expect Trump to follow it, and it should be discarded as a historic relic. Possibly an amendment should be passed to formally remove this provision."
or
2. "Trump knows what he's doing. I believe in him. His lawyers will have made sure his business dealings are fully legal and constitutional. Because I believe that Trump will have adhered to the law and constitution, I believe there will be no case here."
or possibly,
3. "Without knowing anything much about this historical part of the constitution nor having any particular opinion on Trump's business dealings, I'm used to political parties doing fishing expeditions. I believe this to be just the latest political fishing expedition. This must just be the latest version of Dems being mad they didn't win the election. So I assume there's no merits to it."
Comment