Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Trump implicates Scarborough in murder.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostOr... maybe, just maybe, you should quit concocting counterfeit quotes which are nothing more than your jaundiced opinion and pretending it's what someone else said.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostI should have said I parphrase for the sticklers here, but the point is the same.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View Post"And then I see the disinfectent, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning."
The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostOr maybe should stop pretending he doesn't say stupid stuff, along with his constant lies, all the time.
The above post is what I paraphrased which amounts to the same thing. Injecting a disinfectent (bleach is what he was talking about) or almost a cleaning. Like cleaning your countertop.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostOr maybe should stop pretending he doesn't say stupid stuff, along with his constant lies, all the time. The above post is what I paraphrased which amounts to the same thing. Injecting a disinfectent (bleach is what he was talking about) or almost a cleaning. Like cleaning your countertop.
If what he says and does is even a fraction as bad as you purport then you shouldn't feel it necessary to "modify" them as you do. The truth should more than suffice if you're correct. But then maybe you realize that your rhetoric is so far over the top that it is in orbit. That it doesn't bare any resemblance to reality. So you seek to alter reality to match up with your assertions.
Sorry, but it doesn't work that way.
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostIf Trump is so bad then why do you feel compelled to fabricate stuff to support your position like you did here? Why deliberately lie about what he said by substituting his actual words with something that you contrived and which you then sought to palm off as having been said by him?
If what he says and does is even a fraction as bad as you purport then you shouldn't feel it necessary to "modify" them as you do. The truth should more than suffice if you're correct. But then maybe you realize that your rhetoric is so far over the top that it is in orbit. That it doesn't bare any resemblance to reality. So you seek to alter reality to match up with your assertions.
Sorry, but it doesn't work that way.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]45086[/ATTACH]The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostEGGzackly!!!!
I think this one of those things we studied in psychology --- you become what you hate. He's BECOMING TRUMP!!!!
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostOr, at the least, his characterization of Trump.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
-
Apparently, Trump is said to put on an executive order that would essentially remove some of the protections granted to social media companies by a law known as Section 230, which currently stipulates that tech companies not be held liable for content posted by users. Hmm, I agree with that in the sense that all social media platforms should be on the same footing as any other media, and should face lawsuits when users are victims of false allegations. However, Trump is shooting himself in the foot as Twitter is his biggest platform. All of his tweets would then be double- or triple-checked. Go figure.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostHow can you accuse Twitter of using liberal fact checkers when their head of "site integrity," Yoel Roth, the person in charge of their fact checkers, has written the following:
I’ve never donated to a presidential campaign before, but I just gave $100 to Hillary for America. We can’t [veiled f-bomb] around anymore.
I'm just saying, we fly over those states who voted for a racist tangerine for a reason
Today on Meet The Press, we’re speaking with Joseph Goebbels about the first 100 days…’ – What I hear whenever Kellyanne is on a news show
Yes, that person in the pink hat is clearly a bigger threat to your brand of feminism than ACTUAL NAZIS IN THE WHITE HOUSE
He's obviously a cup overflowing with the cream of impartiality. He can be completely trusted to be a neutral, nonpartisan judge.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostThat's his exact quote, CP. You can accept it or not,
truth seeker.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostIf Trump is so bad then why do you feel compelled to fabricate stuff to support your position like you did here? Why deliberately lie about what he said by substituting his actual words with something that you contrived and which you then sought to palm off as having been said by him?
If what he says and does is even a fraction as bad as you purport then you shouldn't feel it necessary to "modify" them as you do. The truth should more than suffice if you're correct. But then maybe you realize that your rhetoric is so far over the top that it is in orbit. That it doesn't bare any resemblance to reality. So you seek to alter reality to match up with your assertions.
Sorry, but it doesn't work that way.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]45086[/ATTACH]
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by little_monkey, 03-27-2024, 04:19 PM
|
16 responses
180 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by One Bad Pig
Yesterday, 11:55 AM
|
||
Started by whag, 03-26-2024, 04:38 PM
|
53 responses
417 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Yesterday, 11:32 AM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 03-26-2024, 11:45 AM
|
25 responses
114 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Yesterday, 08:36 AM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 09:21 AM
|
33 responses
198 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Roy
Yesterday, 07:43 AM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 08:34 AM
|
87 responses
397 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Today, 09:10 AM
|
Comment