Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Proof of collusion: Trump was informed of Wikileak document releases by Stone

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Proof of collusion: Trump was informed of Wikileak document releases by Stone

    Links from breitbart, conservative treehouse, townhall, and other low-credibility right wing sources are not permitted in this thread.

    https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article...s-clinton-dump

    Trump has publicly denied being aware of any information being relayed between WikiLeaks and his advisors.


    One might wonder why Trump would deny knowing about this if he didn't think he was doing anything wrong.
    Last edited by DivineOb; 06-19-2020, 08:41 PM.

  • #2
    Originally posted by DivineOb View Post
    One might wonder why Trump would deny knowing about this if he didn't think he was doing anything wrong.
    At this point, it's well established that he'll lie to anyone at any time for any reason.

    It clear Trump was seeking outside help for his campaign, but as to why he'd lie about this, I'm not so sure he was being crafty / deceptive as much as he was dishonest by default.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Whateverman View Post
      At this point, it's well established that he'll lie to anyone at any time for any reason.

      It clear Trump was seeking outside help for his campaign, but as to why he'd lie about this, I'm not so sure he was being crafty / deceptive as much as he was dishonest by default.
      Hard to know, but with Bolton's book we have a clear and unwavering pattern of asking for help from other nations, even enemies in manipulating circumstances in favor of his political goals. The man should be summarily dismissed from office, charged with treason, and held in jail until a criminal or military trial for the same can convene.

      This is the sort of leader the separation of powers was designed to contain, and impeachment was put in place. And if the gop had even an ounce of the integrity of our founding fathers, we'd no longer be suffering under his abuse.
      Last edited by oxmixmudd; 06-19-2020, 11:14 PM.
      My brethren, do not hold your faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ with an attitude of personal favoritism. James 2:1

      If anyone thinks himself to be religious, and yet does not  bridle his tongue but deceives his own heart, this man’s religion is worthless James 1:26

      This you know, my beloved brethren. But everyone must be quick to hear, slow to speak and slow to anger; James 1:19

      Comment


      • #4
        Basically, the Russia scandal was all true, and he was guilty of everything. Plus guilty of doing the same thing with China.

        Treason with a side order of treason.
        "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
        "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
        "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by DivineOb View Post
          Links from breitbart, conservative treehouse, townhall, and other low-credibility right wing sources are not permitted in this thread.
          Only low-credibility left-wing sources like BuzzFeed are permitted.

          This is your classic "Show me the facts! Oh, wait, not THOSE facts..." routine.
          Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
          But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
          Than a fool in the eyes of God


          From "Fools Gold" by Petra

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by DivineOb View Post
            Links from breitbart, conservative treehouse, townhall, and other low-credibility right wing sources are not permitted in this thread.

            https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article...s-clinton-dump

            Trump has publicly denied being aware of any information being relayed between WikiLeaks and his advisors.


            One might wonder why Trump would deny knowing about this if he didn't think he was doing anything wrong.
            An election is approaching.
            The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
              Only low-credibility left-wing sources like BuzzFeed are permitted.

              This is your classic "Show me the facts! Oh, wait, not THOSE facts..." routine.
              Kinda like a narrative?
              The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by DivineOb View Post
                Links from breitbart, conservative treehouse, townhall, and other low-credibility right wing sources are not permitted in this thread.
                First What is your criteria for deciding something is a credible or non credible source?
                Second what is your evidence that that Buzzfeed* that started out as a Hollywood Gossip site Is credible now?






                *BTW Buzzfeed is the site that gave credence to certain information Steele said he had on what Trump did with some Russian prostitutes which was later proven to be a lie according the source Steele said he got the said information from.
                Last edited by RumTumTugger; 06-20-2020, 02:03 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by RumTumTugger View Post
                  First What is your criteria for deciding something is a credible or non credible source?
                  Why is it that this focus on the details is completely absent when people use labels like "fake news" and "MSM"?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Whateverman View Post
                    Why is it that this focus on the details is completely absent when people use labels like "fake news" and "MSM"?
                    Some of the sources that USED to be considered credible have shed all sense of fairness, and pretty much bragged about it.
                    The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                      Some of the sources that USED to be considered credible have shed all sense of fairness, and pretty much bragged about it.
                      like Buzzfeed DivineOb's source.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        As expected resident RWNJs have nothing to say about the proof of collusion now that Barr's coverup is falling apart.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by RumTumTugger View Post
                          First What is your criteria for deciding something is a credible or non credible source?
                          Credible news sources focus on the news first and make occasional mistakes. RWNJ news sources focus on spin primarily and make frequent "mistakes" which are rarely acknowledged or corrected.

                          Second what is your evidence that that Buzzfeed* that started out as a Hollywood Gossip site Is credible now?
                          Are you claiming that Buzzfeed News is inaccurately reporting what is in the newly unredacted portions of the Mueller Report? Have you checked other credible news sources?
                          Last edited by DivineOb; 06-20-2020, 02:58 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by DivineOb View Post
                            As expected resident RWNJs have nothing to say about the proof of collusion now that Barr's coverup is falling apart.
                            Might you identify these RWNJs, so we can see when one of them says anything?
                            The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                              Might you identify these RWNJs, so we can see when one of them says anything?
                              I've already defined RWNJ previously. Symptoms include 1) complaining about the "the left" 2) allusions to Democrats being communists 3) assertions that the MSM is uncredible 4) COVID45 denailism.

                              Comment

                              Related Threads

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 03:46 PM
                              14 responses
                              77 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post Sparko
                              by Sparko
                               
                              Started by Ronson, Yesterday, 01:52 PM
                              2 responses
                              36 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post rogue06
                              by rogue06
                               
                              Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 09:08 AM
                              6 responses
                              59 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post RumTumTugger  
                              Started by CivilDiscourse, Yesterday, 07:44 AM
                              0 responses
                              22 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post CivilDiscourse  
                              Started by seer, Yesterday, 07:04 AM
                              51 responses
                              250 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post oxmixmudd  
                              Working...
                              X