Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Self-righteous vandals

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Starlight View Post
    I am sure, if you searched hard enough, you could find someone from my county who would disagree with any and every possible statement I might make.

    I can, however, tell you what the people I've happened to talk to in my country have said.
    What are the chances that the people you associate with are just like you?
    The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
      What are the chances that the people you associate with are just like you?
      There's certainly a strong bias toward me talking to people who are both well-educated and well-informed about the world. I'm not sure though that if I were to talk to some people who weren't well-informed to the point where they hadn't heard anything about the US situation, that they would be able to meaningfully contribute an opinion on a subject they knew nothing about? At that point they would be dependent on me having to explain the situation to them before I could elicit their opinion, which you'd presumably discount as biased by my explanation.
      "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
      "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
      "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Leonhard View Post
        There's apparently a strange state law that prevents them from being taken down or updated, even if the city decided to do that. This is risky. Precisely because of situations like this where they fall out of favor, but it suddenly requiring an entire state to vote on it.
        I never heard of any such law, but if that is the case, then yes, it should be changed, via legislature, the same way that law got to be law. Then they can take down any statues they decide needs to come down, legally and peacefully.

        This rioting and destruction needs to stop.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Leonhard View Post
          Though judges also apparently believe it isn't even up to the states, so there's a lot of forces at play preventing any democratic discussion about them.

          https://theconversation.com/latest-l...donors-1411568
          Source: Latest legal hurdle to removing Confederate statues in Virginia: The wishes of their long-dead white donors

          A controversial statue of Robert E. Lee will remain in place in Richmond, the former capital of the American Confederacy –- at least temporarily.

          On June 18, a judge extended an injunction barring the removal of the Confederate general’s statue, stating that “the monument is the property of the people,” not the state of Virginia, which seeks its removal.

          In early June Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam vowed to dismantle the prominent Lee statue in Richmond, the state capital, following sustained, nationwide protests over police brutality and racism. That plan was blocked by a 10-day court injunction – now extended through late July – based on the petition of a man whose ancestor, Otway Allen, gave Virginia the land the the sculpture sits on.

          In his petition, William C. Gregory claimed that dismantling the Lee statue would violate the conditions of his great-grandfather’s 1890 land deed, which says Virginia “will faithfully guard it and affectionately protect it.”

          © Copyright Original Source

          Sounds like this is a unique case to that particular statue, judging by the last line.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Starlight View Post
            I have no problem with people vandalising / destroying / removing offensive statues if (a) a reasonable person I might agree they are legitimately offensive, and (b) no human being is injured in the act (i.e. it's not 'violent' in the sense of human-on-human harm).
            There, FIFY.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Sparko View Post
              There, FIFY.
              Obviously I agree with anything I agree with.
              "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
              "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
              "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Sparko View Post
                I never heard of any such law, but if that is the case, then yes, it should be changed, via legislature, the same way that law got to be law. Then they can take down any statues they decide needs to come down, legally and peacefully.

                This rioting and destruction needs to stop.
                I don't support the rioting and destruction, and I agree that this law should be done away with. It prevents the cities from taking appropriate course of action, or even to consider whether they want to host these statues. However since the law is there, and since getting it changed is very difficult, there might not be much we can do to prevent this statue from being lost to rioters. It'd be a waste of resource to put armed guards there day and night. So at some point I fear there'll be a scandal that'll cause some rioters to take out their frustrations on it.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Sparko View Post
                  Yeah I am sure White Supremacists are going around tearing down confederate statues.
                  Didn't their grandparents do the opposite? And hang black people up for public display?

                  https://gjpaul.files.wordpress.com/2...na-aug1930.jpg
                  "It ain't necessarily so
                  The things that you're liable
                  To read in the Bible
                  It ain't necessarily so
                  ."

                  Sportin' Life
                  Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin

                  Comment

                  Related Threads

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by Cow Poke, Today, 03:46 PM
                  0 responses
                  11 views
                  0 likes
                  Last Post KingsGambit  
                  Started by Ronson, Today, 01:52 PM
                  1 response
                  9 views
                  0 likes
                  Last Post seanD
                  by seanD
                   
                  Started by Cow Poke, Today, 09:08 AM
                  6 responses
                  46 views
                  0 likes
                  Last Post RumTumTugger  
                  Started by CivilDiscourse, Today, 07:44 AM
                  0 responses
                  18 views
                  0 likes
                  Last Post CivilDiscourse  
                  Started by seer, Today, 07:04 AM
                  29 responses
                  155 views
                  0 likes
                  Last Post oxmixmudd  
                  Working...
                  X