Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Srebrenica
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View PostPeople should speak out against any regime or nation that supports [directly or covertly] injustice and brutality.
Yet, in these situations, we are dealing with a massive imbalance of power....The Serbs had access to the military stocks of the former Yugoslav army---while the Bosnians did not. An arms embargo by the U.N. prevented both sides from weaponizing but this also retained the massive imbalance of power.
The U.N. peacekeeping forces were also constrained---they could not actively "protect" the Bosnians---because they were supposed to be "neutral"---only do humanitarian work.
https://www.nytimes.com/1994/11/05/w...e-embargo.html
An arms embargo imposed on the former Yugoslavia in 1991 froze the Bosnian Serbs' weapons superiority in place because Serbs controlled the Yugoslav Army and dipped into its arsenal to supply the Bosnian Serbs.
The Serbs used this advantage to take 70 percent of Bosnian territory, routing the nascent Bosnian Army and terrorizing Muslim civilians.
Their superiority in artillery and tanks remains but now appears to have been offset by the success of the Bosnian Government in providing basic weapons to a large army operating in a mountainous terrain where mobility can outweigh armor.
Today we are also facing this dilemma---Uighurs of China and Rohingya of Burma have asked for weapons to defend themselves against state power---but is this right or wrong?....and what other options can give better solutions?
And another factor to understand is the abuse of the toxic ideology of religio/ethno-nationalism ---that a territory "belongs" to a group that identifies with a particular religion/culture. It is state-tribalism....and because of this, violence is "legalized" (The Holocaust was also legal/state violence) The abuse of Christianity and nationalism played a role in what led upto srebrenica....?....
Comment
-
My daughter went to college with a girl from Kosovo. She and her mother escaped the attempted genocide there and she has told us some VERY gruesome stories about what happened to her family.That's what
- She
Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
- Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)
I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
- Stephen R. Donaldson
Comment
-
Originally posted by Maranatha View PostIf only liberals and basketball players would..."I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill
Comment
-
Other questions that this conflict brings up are---what is a "nation" and what role does "religio-philosophy"---insofar as it directs ethico-moral foundations---play in the resistance to oppression......and the right of citizens to arms.....
Yogoslavia was made up of diverse ethno-religous peoples who were (forcibly) held together by the dictator Tito. There were the Serbs who were Orthodox Christians, the Croats and Slovenians who were Roman Catholic and the Bosnians and Albanians (Kosovo) who were Muslims. Slovenia easily became independent in the 10 days war because it was militarily matched, Yugoslav soldiers of Slovenian ethnicity defected, and the Yogoslav army had no motivation to fight.
The Vatican also supported both Slovenia and Croatia. Croatia initially did not have the military power that the Serbian army had and Serbia used the Croatian-Serbs inside Croatia to fight for them. However, volunteer foreign (mostly Catholic) fighters from the U.K. France and other countries came to fight for Croatia.(---approx 450+) Croatia also had arms factories and soon built up their militia and with the help of arms supplies from the West (Germany, U.S...etc). despite an arms embargo.
The religio-ethnic make up of Bosnia-Herzogovinia was (approx) 44% Muslim Bosniaks, 32% Orthodox Serbs and 17% Catholic Croats. The Bosniaks and Croats in B-H were supplied arms from Croatia but these were limited and did not match the power of the Serbian forces. The Muslims did not have a Vatican behind them, but they called on foreign fighters for help---and some of the Afghan war veterans went in.
In military might---the Bosniaks were weak and therefore perhaps suffered the majority of casualities....?....had they been better armed to defend themselves---would the outcome have been different?
To militarize "religion" is toxic---we have seen this in the crusades and then in ISIS/Daesh---but to do nothing invites genocide.
Who decides what a nation is?---previously, national boundaries were often arbitrarily decided and incompatible groups found themselves as citizens of a "nation" This idea of "nation"--and who gets to live in it and who does not---and who decides this and on what basis---might need to be revisited...?....and the related question---what makes up an "identity"?
The U.S. declaration of Independence gives the right of governance to the people---and by this right they can separate from a government they find "oppressive".
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
therefore... 2nd amendment of the U.S. gives its citizens the right to bear arms.---with the intent to give citizens the means to fight back against an oppressive government. But this---as we can all see today---brings with it damaging consequences.
So how do we balance the power between people/citizens and state/nation?
Comment
-
Originally posted by siam View PostOther questions that this conflict brings up are---what is a "nation" and what role does "religio-philosophy"---insofar as it directs ethico-moral foundations---play in the resistance to oppression......and the right of citizens to arms.....
Yogoslavia was made up of diverse ethno-religous peoples who were (forcibly) held together by the dictator Tito. There were the Serbs who were Orthodox Christians, the Croats and Slovenians who were Roman Catholic and the Bosnians and Albanians (Kosovo) who were Muslims. Slovenia easily became independent in the 10 days war because it was militarily matched, Yugoslav soldiers of Slovenian ethnicity defected, and the Yogoslav army had no motivation to fight.
The Vatican also supported both Slovenia and Croatia. Croatia initially did not have the military power that the Serbian army had and Serbia used the Croatian-Serbs inside Croatia to fight for them. However, volunteer foreign (mostly Catholic) fighters from the U.K. France and other countries came to fight for Croatia.(---approx 450+) Croatia also had arms factories and soon built up their militia and with the help of arms supplies from the West (Germany, U.S...etc). despite an arms embargo.
The religio-ethnic make up of Bosnia-Herzogovinia was (approx) 44% Muslim Bosniaks, 32% Orthodox Serbs and 17% Catholic Croats. The Bosniaks and Croats in B-H were supplied arms from Croatia but these were limited and did not match the power of the Serbian forces. The Muslims did not have a Vatican behind them, but they called on foreign fighters for help---and some of the Afghan war veterans went in.
In military might---the Bosniaks were weak and therefore perhaps suffered the majority of casualities....?....had they been better armed to defend themselves---would the outcome have been different?
To militarize "religion" is toxic---we have seen this in the crusades and then in ISIS/Daesh---but to do nothing invites genocide.
Who decides what a nation is?---previously, national boundaries were often arbitrarily decided and incompatible groups found themselves as citizens of a "nation" This idea of "nation"--and who gets to live in it and who does not---and who decides this and on what basis---might need to be revisited...?....and the related question---what makes up an "identity"?
The U.S. declaration of Independence gives the right of governance to the people---and by this right they can separate from a government they find "oppressive".
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
therefore... 2nd amendment of the U.S. gives its citizens the right to bear arms.---with the intent to give citizens the means to fight back against an oppressive government. But this---as we can all see today---brings with it damaging consequences.
So how do we balance the power between people/citizens and state/nation?"It ain't necessarily so
The things that you're liable
To read in the Bible
It ain't necessarily so."
Sportin' Life
Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin
Comment
-
Originally posted by KingsGambit View PostI feel like this is a missed opportunity for Christians, since there are some in sports. When the NBA had its dust up over Hong Kong, the only NBA player who was vocal in favor of human rights was Enes Kanter... a Muslim.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by CivilDiscourse, Today, 12:07 PM
|
0 responses
4 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Today, 12:07 PM | ||
Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 03:46 PM
|
19 responses
115 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sparko
Today, 12:33 PM
|
||
Started by Ronson, Yesterday, 01:52 PM
|
3 responses
37 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Today, 07:45 AM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 09:08 AM
|
6 responses
59 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by RumTumTugger
Yesterday, 10:30 AM
|
||
Started by CivilDiscourse, Yesterday, 07:44 AM
|
0 responses
22 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Yesterday, 07:44 AM |
Comment