Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Flynn Bombshell: FBI Believed He Was 'Telling Truth'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Flynn Bombshell: FBI Believed He Was 'Telling Truth'

    Flynn Bombshell: FBI Believed He Was 'Telling Truth'

    Months before Michael Flynn was charged with the lying to agents, the FBI told the Justice Department the Trump national security adviser was "very open and forthcoming" in his interview and believed he was telling the truth about his contacts with Russia, according to long withheld government notes that sharply contrast with the criminal case Robert Mueller eventually filed.

    FBI agents told senior DOJ officials at a Jan. 25, 2017 meeting that Flynn was “telling truth as he believed it” and that he "believe[d] that what he said was true," according to handwritten notes taken by then-Deputy Assistant Attorney General Tashina Gauhar that were belatedly turned over to Flynn's defense this month.

    The agents also believed Flynn was “being forthright” during his interview and simply didn't remember some facts from his calls with the Russian ambassador during the post-2016 election transition, Gauhar wrote in the notes. A separate DOJ memo described Flynn as "very open and forthcoming" during the interview.

    You can read the notes here:

    Doc 237 Flynn SUPPLEMENT by Michael T. Flynn re [198] Motion to Dismiss Case (Attachments Exhibit A.pdf

    Copies of the notes from Gauhar, former FBI agent Peter Strzok, who led the Russia collusion case, and former DOJ and FBI official Dana Boente were made public in a court filing over the weekend, adding to a large body of belatedly released evidence that suggested the FBI did not believe it had grounds to charge Flynn with a crime as news media were reporting at the time.

    In fact, Boente stated in handwritten notes dated in March 2017 that the FBI had concluded Flynn wasn't an agent of Russia. "Do not view as source of collusion," Boente wrote.

    Likewise, the notes show DOJ did not believe it could prosecute Flynn under the Logan Act, lone of the laws that was leaked as a possible Flynn liability in the media. "No reasonable pros to Logan Act," one of the entry in the notes declared.

    The notes also confirm previously released evidence showing the FBI planned on Jan. 4, 2017 to close down its investigation of Flynn but then reversed course.

    .....
    The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

  • #2
    Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
    Flynn Bombshell: FBI Believed He Was 'Telling Truth'

    Months before Michael Flynn was charged with the lying to agents, the FBI told the Justice Department the Trump national security adviser was "very open and forthcoming" in his interview and believed he was telling the truth about his contacts with Russia, according to long withheld government notes that sharply contrast with the criminal case Robert Mueller eventually filed.

    FBI agents told senior DOJ officials at a Jan. 25, 2017 meeting that Flynn was “telling truth as he believed it” and that he "believe[d] that what he said was true," according to handwritten notes taken by then-Deputy Assistant Attorney General Tashina Gauhar that were belatedly turned over to Flynn's defense this month.

    The agents also believed Flynn was “being forthright” during his interview and simply didn't remember some facts from his calls with the Russian ambassador during the post-2016 election transition, Gauhar wrote in the notes. A separate DOJ memo described Flynn as "very open and forthcoming" during the interview.

    You can read the notes here:

    Doc 237 Flynn SUPPLEMENT by Michael T. Flynn re [198] Motion to Dismiss Case (Attachments Exhibit A.pdf

    Copies of the notes from Gauhar, former FBI agent Peter Strzok, who led the Russia collusion case, and former DOJ and FBI official Dana Boente were made public in a court filing over the weekend, adding to a large body of belatedly released evidence that suggested the FBI did not believe it had grounds to charge Flynn with a crime as news media were reporting at the time.

    In fact, Boente stated in handwritten notes dated in March 2017 that the FBI had concluded Flynn wasn't an agent of Russia. "Do not view as source of collusion," Boente wrote.

    Likewise, the notes show DOJ did not believe it could prosecute Flynn under the Logan Act, lone of the laws that was leaked as a possible Flynn liability in the media. "No reasonable pros to Logan Act," one of the entry in the notes declared.

    The notes also confirm previously released evidence showing the FBI planned on Jan. 4, 2017 to close down its investigation of Flynn but then reversed course.

    .....
    Old news. Where have you been?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by JimL View Post
      Old news. Where have you been?
      Jim, if you're just going to be a donkey's butt, stay out of my threads, K?
      If you actually have something intelligent to contribute, do so.
      The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

      Comment


      • #4
        Where's the bombshell?

        Comment


        • #5
          Trump loyalists are all the same -- the *entire* government is a corrupt deep state out to ruin him. Yet the DS couldn't put even a fraction of this effort into tipping the scales towards Hillary.

          And CP, allegedly, isn't a big fan of Trump. But he's all up in Flynn's nethers besides.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by DivineOb View Post
            Trump loyalists are all the same -- the *entire* government is a corrupt deep state out to ruin him. Yet the DS couldn't put even a fraction of this effort into tipping the scales towards Hillary.

            And CP, allegedly, isn't a big fan of Trump. But he's all up in Flynn's nethers besides.
            Somebody might want to explain to this little coward that the article was posted without comment for discussion.

            ETA: He supposedly has me on ignore, but can't help himself from gossiping.
            The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
              Somebody might want to explain to this little coward that the article was posted without comment for discussion.

              ETA: He supposedly has me on ignore, but can't help himself from gossiping.
              Like I said, this dud is old news. Where have you been MCP?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by JimL View Post
                Like I said, this dud is old news. Where have you been MCP?
                Bye bye, Jim - you gone!
                The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                  Flynn Bombshell: FBI Believed He Was 'Telling Truth'

                  Months before Michael Flynn was charged with the lying to agents, the FBI told the Justice Department the Trump national security adviser was "very open and forthcoming" in his interview and believed he was telling the truth about his contacts with Russia, according to long withheld government notes that sharply contrast with the criminal case Robert Mueller eventually filed.

                  FBI agents told senior DOJ officials at a Jan. 25, 2017 meeting that Flynn was “telling truth as he believed it” and that he "believe[d] that what he said was true," according to handwritten notes taken by then-Deputy Assistant Attorney General Tashina Gauhar that were belatedly turned over to Flynn's defense this month.

                  The agents also believed Flynn was “being forthright” during his interview and simply didn't remember some facts from his calls with the Russian ambassador during the post-2016 election transition, Gauhar wrote in the notes. A separate DOJ memo described Flynn as "very open and forthcoming" during the interview.

                  You can read the notes here:

                  Doc 237 Flynn SUPPLEMENT by Michael T. Flynn re [198] Motion to Dismiss Case (Attachments Exhibit A.pdf

                  Copies of the notes from Gauhar, former FBI agent Peter Strzok, who led the Russia collusion case, and former DOJ and FBI official Dana Boente were made public in a court filing over the weekend, adding to a large body of belatedly released evidence that suggested the FBI did not believe it had grounds to charge Flynn with a crime as news media were reporting at the time.

                  In fact, Boente stated in handwritten notes dated in March 2017 that the FBI had concluded Flynn wasn't an agent of Russia. "Do not view as source of collusion," Boente wrote.

                  Likewise, the notes show DOJ did not believe it could prosecute Flynn under the Logan Act, lone of the laws that was leaked as a possible Flynn liability in the media. "No reasonable pros to Logan Act," one of the entry in the notes declared.

                  The notes also confirm previously released evidence showing the FBI planned on Jan. 4, 2017 to close down its investigation of Flynn but then reversed course.

                  .....
                  I thought it was old news that the FBI agents who interviewed Flynn concluded he was telling the truth

                  I'm always still in trouble again

                  "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                  "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                  "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Yeah, it actually has been known for a while that the agents didn't believe Flynn had lied and were in the process of closing his case due to a complete lack of "derogatory information" against him.
                    Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
                    But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
                    Than a fool in the eyes of God


                    From "Fools Gold" by Petra

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Even if the news is new, how is this a "bombshell"? The conclusion of an investigation is allowed to change as more evidence becomes available.

                      Seems this headline is nothing more than click-bait.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Whateverman View Post
                        Even if the news is new, how is this a "bombshell"? The conclusion of an investigation is allowed to change as more evidence becomes available.

                        Seems this headline is nothing more than click-bait.
                        And even if the case were closed, which it wasn't, it can always be re-opened. They didn't have to re-open it because it hadn't been closed by the time that the FBI found that Flynn had lied to the VP about his conversations with Kislyak which put Flynn in a compromised position with the Russians.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by JimL View Post
                          And even if the case were closed, which it wasn't, it can always be re-opened. They didn't have to re-open it because it hadn't been closed by the time that the FBI found that Flynn had lied to the VP about his conversations with Kislyak which put Flynn in a compromised position with the Russians.
                          You were told to leave the thread, Jim.

                          Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                          Bye bye, Jim - you gone!
                          ETA: HOWEVER ---- I hereby rescind the banning, cause....

                          A) I like you
                          2) Ain't nobody can show liberals for who they are quite like you.

                          Blog on!!!!
                          Last edited by Cow Poke; 07-15-2020, 02:09 PM.
                          The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                            You were told to leave the thread, Jim.



                            ETA: HOWEVER ---- I hereby rescind the banning, cause....

                            A) I like you
                            2) Ain't nobody can show liberals for who they are quite like you.

                            Blog on!!!!
                            If you disagree with something he said, civil discourse dictates that rather than attacking him personally, you explain the nature of the disagreement.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Whateverman View Post
                              If you disagree with something he said, civil discourse dictates that rather than attacking him personally, you explain the nature of the disagreement.
                              Calm yourself, buddy - I already invited him back.

                              But, it's cute that you guys think you have to coddle him and speak for him, like he's some kind of moron.
                              The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                              Comment

                              Related Threads

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by seer, Today, 01:12 PM
                              4 responses
                              55 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post Sparko
                              by Sparko
                               
                              Started by rogue06, Yesterday, 09:33 AM
                              45 responses
                              352 views
                              1 like
                              Last Post Starlight  
                              Started by whag, 04-16-2024, 10:43 PM
                              60 responses
                              389 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post seanD
                              by seanD
                               
                              Started by rogue06, 04-16-2024, 09:38 AM
                              0 responses
                              27 views
                              1 like
                              Last Post rogue06
                              by rogue06
                               
                              Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 04-16-2024, 06:47 AM
                              100 responses
                              440 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post CivilDiscourse  
                              Working...
                              X