Expose the Deed of Darkness

[Leonhard]

I've considered letting the HR department of the company I work have a heads up about it, in case on the crazy conspiracy nutters go on a vengeance quest sending nasty emails.

[seanD]

Mike, why would they advertise something like on a public forum out in the open for all to see, including possible inquiries by law enforcement?

[Cow Poke]

....And that was the quote unquote smoking gone.....

Talk about coded messages! My liberal friend has imagined ALL GUNS being GONE!!!!

ETA: OR, wait ... . maybe it's banning cigarettes.

[Leonhard]

Talk about coded messages! My liberal friend has imagined ALL GUNS being GONE!!!!

ETA: OR, wait ... . maybe it's banning cigarettes.

I'm sorry to see so many people buying into this QAnon / Pizzagate nonsense. Hopefully people won't get hurt by it.

[mikewhitney]

In a facebook copy-pasta about this I pointed out these things, and within half an hour I was accused of being a pedophile.

Who made these accusations? Just other users, I presume?

Did the children's names reasonably match the furniture names?

Did the prices exists on Wayfair?

Are we not to be concerned about the Epstein activity?

[Cow Poke]

I'm sorry to see so many people buying into this QAnon / Pizzagate nonsense. Hopefully people won't get hurt by it.

And the problem with this is, if you try too hard to investigate it, your internet cache collects some... um.... don't be surprised if, down the road, pictures of children start popping up on your screen.
I try not to search - even for legitimate research - these kinds of things.

[mikewhitney]

Mike, why would they advertise something like on a public forum out in the open for all to see, including possible inquiries by law enforcement?

The thing we seem to be finding, as found with the Epstein cases, is that law enforcement has largely been hands-off from exploring most human trafficking cases. How much follow through have we heard on the Epstein evidence?

[Leonhard]

Who made these accusations? Just other users, I presume?

Other users who are into this QAnon nonsense.

Did the children's names reasonably match the furniture names?

There's no reasonable comparison of names. The only piece of evidence that was tangible was a link between SKU codes and pictures of kids on Yandex. That was the big smoking gun. However it turned out the codes were irrelevant, the only thing that mattered was that you prefaced the code with 'SRC USA', in fact searching 'SRC USA' turned up the images. The images of the kids were also highly photoshopped by the conspiracy theorists, their eyes were censored out which gave the impression of something forbidden, when typically it was just kids from shoe ads.

Did the prices exists on Wayfair?

Yes there's overpriced items. I suspect a money laundering scam, but I don't see a sex trafficking scam. That stuff is likely done face to face like seanD describes it actually having taken place.

Are we not to be concerned about the Epstein activity?

We are, but I don't think there's a link to Wayfaire. I skimmed through the video but it was just reams and reams of intangible links, and this person that worked at Clinton Foundation, or this art piece hanging in that persons home etc... all of it circumstantial and very, very thin. The only smoking gun was the link with the codes and that was almost immediately debunked.

Epstein had an island where he did his business, and shady business deals done person to person. I see no reason why a public website would be modified for this purpose.

Try answering this question: Why run the risk of using a public website to do this?

[seanD]

The thing we seem to be finding, as found with the Epstein cases, is that law enforcement has largely been hands-off from exploring most human trafficking cases. How much follow through have we heard on the Epstein evidence?

That doesn't really answer the question though. These things are typically done underground, not out in the open like that, for obvious reasons. How many folks knew anything about Epstein and what he was doing until it was exposed by law enforcement when he was actually brought to court? Not many. There's a reason for that. They don't do such things in the open for the internet sleuths to expose, much less law enforcement.

[Leonhard]

The thing we seem to be finding, as found with the Epstein cases, is that law enforcement has largely been hands-off from exploring most human trafficking cases. How much follow through have we heard on the Epstein evidence?

That doesn't answer the question. Why would they do it like this? Why not just use private chat channels, or a closed onion-router protocol server, or just plain old face to face contact on a secluded island?

[KingsGambit]

I'm sorry to see so many people buying into this QAnon / Pizzagate nonsense. Hopefully people won't get hurt by it.

QAnon is mainstream. There are several Republican congressional candidates who support it, including Oregon's Republican US Senator nominee.

[Leonhard]

QAnon is mainstream. There are several Republican congressional candidates who support it, including Oregon's Republican US Senator nominee.

Gross.

[seanD]

QAnon is mainstream. There are several Republican congressional candidates who support it, including Oregon's Republican US Senator nominee.

QAonon is intelligence. I'd stake my life on it. I'm not saying there are real intelligence "good guys" behind the scenes fighting the bad guys, but that the theory itself looks and sounds like a psyop to me. Being that the right's trust in intelligence was waning as result of all the revelations in last four years, it was imperative for them gain that trust again to have those on the right thinking they're still good guys in the intelligence community.

[mikewhitney]

That doesn't answer the question. Why would they do it like this? Why not just use private chat channels, or a closed onion-router protocol server, or just plain old face to face contact on a secluded island?

I have not conveniently found flight schedules to Epstein's island.

People like convenience. It does not seem farfetched to entice people with information at hand on the internet. I think it would make the pedophilia more interesting by making these guys have to search for children through little clues or tricks on the internet.

The problem of using private chat channels or onion-routers is that you might more likely be hitting a honey pot where you get exposed. The Tor process has been rigged by the CIA to send a tracer back to your computer so, again, you can be tracked.

By contrast, going to Wayfair, you would be on a popular store front website where you might feel a little more comfortable visiting.

I'm not sure of the reasons for covering up the pornography and child trafficking problem.

[whag]

Wayfair is exposed for porn and child trafficking. The problems did not end with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

The news media primarily covers up this activity. This is not a new problem. In The Franklin Cover-up we see the earlier problem in Nebraska (supplying to Washington DC).

I think it is time to look at this topic more seriously.

Don't watch this video if you are too sensitive to this topic.