Originally posted by Whateverman
View Post
p and (q or r) = (p and q) or (p and r)
which is modified, which makes sense since you have to relative variables of momentum to position, and if you do that in a straight forward way with observables you'd get nonsense in the Copenhagen interpretation. That being said even the Quantum Logic interpretation is completely consistent with Classicial Logic, and that's why I think they moved away from talking about it in any foundational sense. You can recast that interpretation entirely as a set of rules on how observables (stuff like momentum and position) variables relate to eachother via mathematical projections. And that's done anyway in advanced courses.
However in no way need seer, or anyone else grant you that Quantum Mechanics proves that logic has broken down. He especially doesn't have to grant that the law of noncontradiction has broken down. I suggest actually taking the time to read some entry books on Quantum Mechanics, you should be able to grasp it if you've had basic linear algebra and calculus.
Comment