NY attorney General moves to dissolve the NRA for Fraud.

[Cow Poke]

No CP. The whataboutism defense is an excuse, pure and simple.

Nope, it's not. You're obviously too stupid to comprehend the fact that I am FOR the prosecution of wrongdoing in EITHER case - so it's obviously NOT an "excuse".

[JimL]

Nope, it's not. You're obviously too stupid to comprehend the fact that I am FOR the prosecution of wrongdoing in EITHER case - so it's obviously NOT an "excuse".

Then why even bring it up? It's an excuse.

[Cow Poke]

Then why even bring it up? It's an excuse.

Nope - it's a comparison.

It's not the NRA as an organization that's the problem - it's the leadership.

Same as with other such organizations, like unions. And those in the wrong should be investigated and, if warranted, prosecuted.

[JimL]

Nope - it's a comparison.

It's not the NRA as an organization that's the problem - it's the leadership.

Same as with other such organizations, like unions. And those in the wrong should be investigated and, if warranted, prosecuted.

That's your opinion, not what the Atty Gen. has found. The corruption according to the suit is throughout the organization.

[Cow Poke]

That's your opinion, not what the Atty Gen. has found.

The AG is bitterly partisan, as has been noted throughout this thread. That's not 'my opinion', it's fact.

The corruption according to the suit is throughout the organization.

Yes, the ignorant extremely partisan AG is grossly overreaching. Not surprised you would approve of that.
It goes along with your ignorant pro-anarchy persona.

[Cow Poke]

This may actually be a gift to the Republicans --- an unbridled attack on the 2nd amendment for political purposes...

[JimL]

The AG is bitterly partisan, as has been noted throughout this thread. That's not 'my opinion', it's fact.



Yes, the ignorant extremely partisan AG is grossly overreaching. Not surprised you would approve of that.
It goes along with your ignorant pro-anarchy persona.

Oh, I take it you already know all the facts of the case.

[Cow Poke]

Oh, I take it you already know all the facts of the case.

Another profoundly ignorant statement. You're on a roll this morning!

A) It's no secret that the AG is rabidly anti-Trump.
2) I know that, when you suspect illegal activity, you investigate and prosecute those you deem guilty.
3) You do not do something incredibly stupid like try to "dissolve" the entire organization. That shows prosecutorial misconduct and gross overreach.
D) If the leadership is corrupt, they need to be prosecuted, as I have already said, under due process and current law.

[JimL]

Another profoundly ignorant statement. You're on a roll this morning!

A) It's no secret that the AG is rabidly anti-Trump.

So, do you mean to say that a pro Trump atty gen would justify the suit/

2) I know that, when you suspect illegal activity, you investigate and prosecute those you deem guilty.

That what I said, the organization is corrupt from the top down according to the suit. Trump University was dissolved for the same reason.

3) You do not do something incredibly stupid like try to "dissolve" the entire organization. That shows prosecutorial misconduct and gross overreach.

You do if the entire orcanization is corrupt.

D) If the leadership is corrupt, they need to be prosecuted, as I have already said, under due process and current law.

See above.

[Cow Poke]

So, do you mean to say that a pro Trump atty gen would justify the suit/

Any AG without rabid prejudice would not use the law to try to "dissolve" an organization, exposing their entirely political objective.

That what I said, the organization is corrupt from the top down according to the suit. Trump University was dissolved for the same reason.

So, you're the guy pretending to know all the facts of the case.

You do if the entire orcanization is corrupt.

That has yet to be proven.

[Whateverman]

This may actually be a gift to the Republicans --- an unbridled attack on the 2nd amendment for political purposes...

Since when is the NRA the 2nd amendment?

[NorrinRadd]

Turley weighs in.

Basically, it's selective prosecution seeking a ridiculous remedy (dissolution) done more as a political stunt by the prosecutor (or AG, or whatever) than as a legitimate quest for justice.

[Cow Poke]

Since when is the NRA the 2nd amendment?

My apologies. I really didn't think anybody would be so stupid as to draw that conclusion.

[Cow Poke]

Turley weighs in.

Basically, it's selective prosecution seeking a ridiculous remedy (dissolution) done more as a political stunt by the prosecutor (or AG, or whatever) than as a legitimate quest for justice.

EGGzackly!

[JimL]

Nope - it's a comparison.

It's not the NRA as an organization that's the problem - it's the leadership.

Same as with other such organizations, like unions. And those in the wrong should be investigated and, if warranted, prosecuted.

Right, it's an excuse by insinuation and comparison.