View Poll Results: If marijuana were legal, is it immoral for a christian to use it?
- Voters
- 21. You may not vote on this poll
-
March 25th 2004, 11:28 AM #31
Oh....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Em7, Jinx neg repped me too and said the same thing!!!
WOOOO! Hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!! This is so funny. Thank you Jinx, you have totally made my day with a smile.I seriously doubt God's plan included humans smoking pot to get high.
-
March 25th 2004, 11:49 AM #32
Originally posted by Ru-Tang!
Yup Got the same line myself, I don't think he even read the thread to see the points some of us were trying to make in comparing alcohol and marijuanaFreedom means love without condition, without a beginning or an end.-FIF
God has told you, O mortal, what is good and what does the Lord require of you, but to do justice and to love kindness and to walk humbly with your God. -Micah 6:8
The real situation is that man who is made in the image of God is unable,..., to be satisfied with a god who is made in man's image. - Reinhold Niebuhr
-
March 25th 2004, 11:55 AM #33
There is a purpose to smoking marijuana recreationally besides getting stoned. Some people smoke because it's gaseous refreshment.
There is only one purpose to drinking alcohol recreationally, and that's to get rashed. Whether it's just a little or a lot, the purpose is the same.
So, it all falls under drunkenness.Freedom means love without condition, without a beginning or an end.-FIF
God has told you, O mortal, what is good and what does the Lord require of you, but to do justice and to love kindness and to walk humbly with your God. -Micah 6:8
The real situation is that man who is made in the image of God is unable,..., to be satisfied with a god who is made in man's image. - Reinhold Niebuhr
-
March 25th 2004, 11:56 AM #34
"Gaseous refreshment?"
"... engage your brain before you engage your weapon." - Gen. James Mattis, USMC
I don't care how systematic your theology is until you show me how biblical it is.
-
March 25th 2004, 12:16 PM #35
I don't even compare pot to alcohol, mostly. You can smoke pot and get a little high without getting stoned.
And by smoking it in this way, I see very little difference between that and taking NyQuil when you are sick, tylenol PM to relax to sleep, or migraine pills when you've got a killer migraine.
Is taking NyQuil drunkenness as well- because when we take it, we know we are most likely to get a little high and go to sleep.
-
March 25th 2004, 12:22 PM #36
You don't take nyquil recreationally, do you?
"... engage your brain before you engage your weapon." - Gen. James Mattis, USMC
I don't care how systematic your theology is until you show me how biblical it is.
-
March 25th 2004, 12:32 PM #37Nope.... but when I was a teenager a bunch of kids abused Robitussin DM to get "high".
Originally posted by themuzicman
But what I am saying is, that when people take things such as NyQuil, it tends to knock you out- it's even advertised that way for that purpose.
-
March 25th 2004, 12:35 PM #38- Nahhhh I don't buy that. If I can drink one cold beer on a hot Friday afternoon and it's okay (I'm not drunk, that is, impaired), then I should be able to smoke one spliff on the way to the club (I'm not stoned, that is, impaired) and it should be okay.There is a purpose to drinking alcohol recreationally besides getting drunk. Some people drink beer because it's liquid refreshment.
There is only one purpose to smoking marijuana recreationally, and that's to get stoned. Whether it's just a little or a lot, the purpose is the same.
So, it all falls under drunkenness.
- Seems to me the problems arise equally: too much of either thing will impair you, and it's at that point where you become "drunk". Now, scripturally? You guys are on your own there, I'm not going to pretend to try to apply real-world circumstances to the bible to try and come up with some kind of answer."In better times, we even had laws prohibiting homosexual behavior enev [sic] though we had the Bill of Rights at that time." - Kewlie
"That was a rather sexist comment if I ever saw one." - Kewlie
"The problem would appear to be prejudice on your part." - Kewlie
"You're quite free to display your bigotry and intolerance anyway you wish. Your display ... highlights the hypocritical intolerance of the left." - Kewlie
"Another thread with a dishonest title seasoned with hate and bigotry" - Kewlie
"Not Minn, his are one sided and hateful, laced with intense bigotry against anything Christian" - Kewlie
"I don't believe in tolerance and have never claimed that I do." - Kewlie
"Otherwise, your statement would be funny if it weren't filled with so much hate." - Kewlie
-
March 25th 2004, 12:36 PM #39
And it's also controlled by the FDA, and needs FDA approval before it can be sold for that purpose. It also includes warnings and dosage information, which the consumer is expected to follow.
Which brings me back to my original post. If someone gets it approved as a controlelled substance by the FDA for specific uses, as Nyquil and vicodin and all the other medicines out there are, then I don't have a problem with it.
But recreational use is still akin to drunkenness.
I don't think you mean to imply that using Nyquil to get a buzz is moral, do you?
Michael"... engage your brain before you engage your weapon." - Gen. James Mattis, USMC
I don't care how systematic your theology is until you show me how biblical it is.
-
March 25th 2004, 12:41 PM #40
Originally posted by themuzicman
Of course not.
-
March 25th 2004, 12:43 PM #41In Texas if you are drinking in the presence of your legal guardian, even if you are underaged it is legal.We all drink at family gatherings, it's always been acceptable even underaged.
-
March 25th 2004, 12:43 PM #42
- Join Date
- October 17th, 2003
- Location
- Central Ohio
- Posts
- 2,468
- Blog Entries
- 47
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
Female - ChristianHmmm
That sounds like a nice one to try after a White Castle lunch...
Originally posted by themuzicman
"Ok, boys, I was just trying to provide you some gaseous refreshment!"
(as they are choking and gagging and clawing at the car doors in a futile attempt to escape the Green Cloud of Death)
My view as a Christian (and I smoked cigs for years, but thank God by his grace I am free of that bondage) is that smoking anything is wrong for me. That includes weed. But if the choice is: "which is the lesser evil, someone being drunk or stoned," the person who is stoned is a lesser risk to him/herself and others than the drunkard is. Christians can't necessarily expect non-Christians to adhere to the same rules, and even then it's not necessarily about rules. Because I have a tendency toward becoming dependent- in the past I was a heavy drinker, smoked doob and even after I no longer drank or smoked doob, I smoked cigs for years- and by God's grace I have learned these things are not good for me. These are things I need to avoid not because of "'da rules" but because I want to live to glorify God. Being dependent upon substances that dull my awareness and harm my health and effectiveness is not a good witness. It's a question of submitting to God's will out of love and as a response to His grace and love for me, not a question of "it's against the rules."
Alcohol is portrayed both positively and negatively in Scripture- Jesus drank wine and wine is named many times in Scripture as a gift, something to enjoy. But wine is a gift with boundaries- just as the gift of sex has boundaries. We can agree- sex with one's spouse is a good thing, it is God's intent for sexuality, but we pervert and misuse that gift if we engage in sex with anyone other than one's spouse or if we engage in sexual activity outside of God's design and intent for our bodies (homosexual sex.) Alcohol as well can be a good gift- a glass of wine with dinner or a beer or two with friends is fine, but drunkenness too is sin. A person who struggles with the correct parameters and boundaries for these gifts may need to abstain from them entirely to avoid falling into sin.
I agree that God did intend for us to use certain things for medicine including pain killers, but I don't think He intended "recreational" use as in chronic drunkenness or being stoned all the time."Your eyes beheld my unformed substance. In your book were written all the days that were formed for me, when none of them as yet existed" - Psalm 139:16 (NRSV)
-
March 25th 2004, 12:54 PM #43I believe that the choice of someone to use marijuana is an individual one. But I do not lump everyone who uses marijuana in the "recreational use" category. Marijuana has some good benefits that I won't deny, and I am not talking about sitting around with a group of friends tokin on a huge fatty on a saturday night. I see a person who takes a hit off of a joint to relieve a migraine no more "ungodly" than someone who takes a prescription pill (not saying you do think they are immoral).
Originally posted by elysian
-
March 25th 2004, 12:56 PM #44
My former pastor used to smoke in his early days, and many of his generation did to (this is the UK). It was common he said, to arrive in the coatroom and see a cloud of smoke as everyone had their last before the service. but once the information about the damage smoking does came out, it became apparent that smoking was wrong. I don't like the word immoral, it's not Christian; it was unChristian to engage in an activity that would have such deleterious affects on one's body, leaving aside the issue of addiction and nice feelings (apparently). the same goes for drug use. The government in the UK is majoring on the fact that various recreational drugs are not harmless, that smoking dope can be as if not more harmful than smoking tobacco. And the other drugs are worse. the issue of whether we are allowed to feel good should be separate from this matter, but there is the fact of what we would do to feel good (spend a lot of money), and what we might do while "feeling good" (crash a car for instance, or walk out an upper storey window).
Some always revert to the, oh yeah what about tea and coffee. But if they were shown to be either a) harmful to my health, b) addictive beyond normal means to give up, or c) producing anti-social behaviour, then I would give them up, as the Christian thing to do.
I don't drink alcohol because it does not take much to make me tipsy, and very silly. I don't smoke cos its horrible, smelly, and bad for my lungs and heart. i don't do dope for all those reasons.
-
March 25th 2004, 12:57 PM #45
I don't think anyone is lumping them all into the same category, Roobz.
But that perscription drug has been tested to find the correct dosage and usage in the best interests of the patient, and has FDA approval before it goes out on to the shelf.
There are no laws which need to change today for marijuana to become available in this manner. Someone just has to do the work.
Michael"... engage your brain before you engage your weapon." - Gen. James Mattis, USMC
I don't care how systematic your theology is until you show me how biblical it is.
Similar Threads
-
Christians who smoke Cigarettes.. =Sinful?
By princesa in forum Christianity 201Replies: 53Last Post: June 24th 2010, 02:02 AM -
Can Christians Smoke Pot, Crack, Shoot Up, etc.
By ForHimAlone in forum Biblical EthicsReplies: 29Last Post: August 23rd 2006, 11:30 AM -
POLL: If marijuana was legal...
By Pitah7 in forum LobbyReplies: 33Last Post: October 26th 2004, 08:03 PM -
If pedophilia were legal, would it be immoral for Christians to engage in it?
By The Laughing Man in forum Civics 101Replies: 42Last Post: March 26th 2004, 04:14 AM -
Is Slavery not immoral because Christians say so?
By jimbo in forum Apologetics 301Replies: 1Last Post: November 29th 2003, 12:13 PM















































































Quote

Seeking
Today, 03:34 PM in Christianity 201