Originally posted by 37818
View Post
(p-t) I find your descriptions of Christ, very confusing. I am a scholar of the Old Testament (English). What makes you think that your understanding/explanation of Christ is right/logical?
(ex) God, and Lord, and Savior, and good Shepherd, and Right Arm... etc... etc... all mean the same thing to me, but why don't they mean the same thing to YOU? (Edit: Do they mean the same thing to you? If not, why?)
(que') Do you think the intent/purpose of God's Godhead is to encourage us to focus on the uni(fing) aspects/oneness/monotheistic aspects/togetherness of it, or the separateness/division/differences of it?
(GK1) Oh really. Can you back that up? (Remember, you speaking to someone who actually KNOWS the Bible). *
(GK2) I'm waiting for the proof.
(OE) I've read Acts and Isaiah. Isaiah is one of my favorite books. I'd like to know why you are using these passages to SUPPORT your theology?
(BOTB) The Original 1611. And, yes, I do know a little about Antioch and Alexandria; but not as much as I'd like to know about Siniaticus, Vaticanus, and Textus, etc. I have a question for you. How much of the History/philosophy of history/history of politics/history of nations/church history/history of authors/biographies/autobiographies/history of "progress" (corruption, crime syndicates, OC) surrounding these translations/editions do you know? (Edit: Sorry, the KJ, not the Original, but that's what I subscribe to.)
Comment