Fired for �Diverging� on Climate

[John Reece]

The only possible excuse the industrialised countries will have is that if, when they discovered the problem they did their best to fix it. The deniers are working to obfuscate and cover up the wrongdoing which might make a legal defence more difficult in the long term.

https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Roy...nce-causes.pdf

The document presented via the link is itself a masterpiece of obfuscation.

For instance, it begins by asking "Is the Climate Warming?" and then presents an answer that fails to note the fact that for the past nearly two decades there has been zero discernible increase in average global surface temperature.

The document is thus demonstrably deceptive and dishonest.

See here, here, and especially here.

[Sparko]

The only possible excuse the industrialised countries will have is that if, when they discovered the problem they did their best to fix it. The deniers are working to obfuscate and cover up the wrongdoing which might make a legal defence more difficult in the long term.

Do you know what question begging is? you should. You do it so well.

[John Reece]

More re Professor Caleb Rossiter

here

See ten interesting comments by scientists, and one by an economic publicist, in the U.S.A., Sweden, Germany, Czech Republic, Canada, Italy, and Holland here.

[firstfloor]

The document presented via the link is itself a masterpiece of obfuscation.

[John Reece]

polluter

What is the difference between your use of the word "polluterhttp://www.globalwarming.org)?

polluters.

The Clean Air Act stops polluterpolluters weaken our clean air protection.

polluterFact check time.

[Sparko]

What is the difference between your use of the word "polluterhttp://www.globalwarming.org)?

polluters.

The Clean Air Act stops polluterpolluters weaken our clean air protection.

polluterFact check time.

er.... isn't carbon dioxide what we EXHALE? That little baby is just another carbon polluter!!! He should have been aborted to keep our carbon footprint down.

[Just Some Dude]

But wouldn't the mother have a greater carbon footprint, being more fully grown than the babe?

[John Reece]

Climate Mafia Chronicles

POSTED ON JUNE 16, 2014 BY STEVEN HAYWARD

CLIMATE MAFIA CHRONICLESI argued last week in the Weekly StandardWall Street JournalRossiter thinks:

[Sparko]

Mafia?

More like:

[John Reece]

'Team Science' Suppression

From Watts Up With That (color emphasis added):

.

http://www.bishop-hill.net/blog/2014...ate-arena.html

It is well worth your time.

It is unfortunate though, that this academic has chosen not to identify himself and to speak up to his colleagues about this treatment and behavior. Doing so is the only way to push back against this sort of censorship of science.