Ancient Humans Bred with Completely Unknown Species

[Jesse]

Source: Ancient Humans Bred with Completely Unknown Species

Source

© Copyright Original Source

Sons of God perhaps?

[seanD]

The world will likely propose some sort of extraterrestrial evoked species theory (assuming that the mystery DNA remains unexplained), before they believe anything Genesis has to say.

[Jesse]

The world will likely propose some sort of extraterrestrial evoked species theory (assuming that the mystery DNA remains unexplained), before they believe anything Genesis has to say.

Isn't that the truth :(.

[Manw� S�limo]

You hear that? Scientists have confirmed we live in Middle-earth! My life hasn't been wasted!

[seanD]

The world will likely propose some sort of extraterrestrial evoked species theory (assuming that the mystery DNA remains unexplained), before they believe anything Genesis has to say.

*evolved

[Cow Poke]

Source: Ancient Humans Bred with Completely Unknown Species

Source

© Copyright Original Source

Sons of God perhaps?

aliens.jpg

[Jesse]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]1029[/ATTACH]

Heh. I love that guy. I wonder if aliens are responsible for that hair.

[shunyadragon]

Unknown is simply unknown and not subject to alien or bestiality conjecture and conspiracies.

[Cow Poke]

Unknown is simply unknown and not subject to alien or bestiality conjecture and conspiracies.

Unknown is ALWAYS subject to conspiracies!

[Juvenal]

Source

Actual source:

Sons of God perhaps?

The patriarch tales from Genesis derive from Mesopotamian populations that arose after the end of the last ice age, c. 10k years ago.

The results suggest that interbreeding went on between the members of several ancient human-like groups in Europe and Asia more than 30,000 years ago, including an as-yet-unknown human ancestor from Asia.

As ever, Jesse

[Cow Poke]

Actual source:



The patriarch tales from Genesis derive from Mesopotamian populations that arose after the end of the last ice age, c. 10k years ago.

The results suggest that interbreeding went on between the members of several ancient human-like groups in Europe and Asia more than 30,000 years ago, including an as-yet-unknown human ancestor from Asia.

As ever, Jesse

Every party needs a pooper that's why we invited you.

[Jesse]

Actual source:



The patriarch tales from Genesis derive from Mesopotamian populations that arose after the end of the last ice age, c. 10k years ago.

The results suggest that interbreeding went on between the members of several ancient human-like groups in Europe and Asia more than 30,000 years ago, including an as-yet-unknown human ancestor from Asia.

As ever, Jesse

All of it is conjecture until they get deeper into the genomes. I wouldn't hang my hat on just one. Does it have to be human? Nope. Part human? Sure.

[whag]

All of it is conjecture until they get deeper into the genomes. I wouldn't hang my hat on just one. Does it have to be human? Nope. Part human? Sure.

It's realistic that we bred with other species. We have a propensity to multiply.


It's preposterous to think that species was the legend that Genesis describes. Angels are spirit. How would they have compatible reproductive apparatus with human beings?

[Jesse]

It's realistic that we bred with other species. We have a propensity to multiply.


It's preposterous to think that species was the legend that Genesis describes. Angels are spirit. How would they have compatible reproductive apparatus with human beings?

J.P. makes a good case for angels (dimensional beings) in Genesis 6. Of course he is not the only one. We know nothing of the physical makeup of these beings so how would it be considered preposterous? The Bible states in many passages about angels having physical manifestations: Acts 12:5-12, Genesis 19:1-7, Genesis 19:10-13.

So if they can touch you, eat with you etc. then yes, they can possibly manifest compatible sexual organs and sperm. I don't see how if angels (again dimensional beings) are real, any of this would be preposterous.

[Cow Poke]

J.P. makes a good case for angels (dimensional beings) in Genesis 6. Of course he is not the only one. We know nothing of the physical makeup of these beings so how would it be considered preposterous? The Bible states in many passages about angels having physical manifestations: Acts 12:5-12, Genesis 19:1-7, Genesis 19:10-13.

So if they can touch you, eat with you etc. then yes, they can possibly manifest sexual organs and sperm. I don't see how if angels (again dimensional beings) are real, any of this would be preposterous.

Demons are portrayed as disembodied spirits -- not angels.