Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 60

Thread: Ancient Humans Bred with Completely Unknown Species

  1. #11
    See, the Thing is... Cow Poke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    44,274
    Amen (Given)
    9539
    Amen (Received)
    21675
    Quote Originally Posted by lao tzu View Post
    Actual source: Mystery humans spiced up ancients’ sex lives



    The patriarch tales from Genesis derive from Mesopotamian populations that arose after the end of the last ice age, c. 10k years ago.

    The results suggest that interbreeding went on between the members of several ancient human-like groups in Europe and Asia more than 30,000 years ago, including an as-yet-unknown human ancestor from Asia.

    As ever, Jesse
    Every party needs a pooper that's why we invited you.

    1 Tim 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.

  2. #12
    tWebber Jesse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Salem, Oregon
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    1,342
    Amen (Given)
    1481
    Amen (Received)
    661
    Quote Originally Posted by lao tzu View Post
    Actual source: Mystery humans spiced up ancients’ sex lives



    The patriarch tales from Genesis derive from Mesopotamian populations that arose after the end of the last ice age, c. 10k years ago.

    The results suggest that interbreeding went on between the members of several ancient human-like groups in Europe and Asia more than 30,000 years ago, including an as-yet-unknown human ancestor from Asia.

    As ever, Jesse
    All of it is conjecture until they get deeper into the genomes. I wouldn't hang my hat on just one. Does it have to be human? Nope. Part human? Sure.
    "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." ― C.S. Lewis, God in the Dock: Essays on Theology (Making of Modern Theology)

  3. #13
    tWebber whag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Agnostic
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    3,163
    Amen (Given)
    454
    Amen (Received)
    337
    Quote Originally Posted by Jesse View Post
    All of it is conjecture until they get deeper into the genomes. I wouldn't hang my hat on just one. Does it have to be human? Nope. Part human? Sure.
    It's realistic that we bred with other species. We have a propensity to multiply.


    It's preposterous to think that species was the legend that Genesis describes. Angels are spirit. How would they have compatible reproductive apparatus with human beings?

  4. Amen Duragizer amen'd this post.
  5. #14
    tWebber Jesse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Salem, Oregon
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    1,342
    Amen (Given)
    1481
    Amen (Received)
    661
    Quote Originally Posted by whag View Post
    It's realistic that we bred with other species. We have a propensity to multiply.


    It's preposterous to think that species was the legend that Genesis describes. Angels are spirit. How would they have compatible reproductive apparatus with human beings?
    J.P. makes a good case for angels (dimensional beings) in Genesis 6. Of course he is not the only one. We know nothing of the physical makeup of these beings so how would it be considered preposterous? The Bible states in many passages about angels having physical manifestations: Acts 12:5-12, Genesis 19:1-7, Genesis 19:10-13.

    So if they can touch you, eat with you etc. then yes, they can possibly manifest compatible sexual organs and sperm. I don't see how if angels (again dimensional beings) are real, any of this would be preposterous.
    Last edited by Jesse; 08-07-2014 at 09:07 PM.
    "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." ― C.S. Lewis, God in the Dock: Essays on Theology (Making of Modern Theology)

  6. #15
    See, the Thing is... Cow Poke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    44,274
    Amen (Given)
    9539
    Amen (Received)
    21675
    Quote Originally Posted by Jesse View Post
    J.P. makes a good case for angels (dimensional beings) in Genesis 6. Of course he is not the only one. We know nothing of the physical makeup of these beings so how would it be considered preposterous? The Bible states in many passages about angels having physical manifestations: Acts 12:5-12, Genesis 19:1-7, Genesis 19:10-13.

    So if they can touch you, eat with you etc. then yes, they can possibly manifest sexual organs and sperm. I don't see how if angels (again dimensional beings) are real, any of this would be preposterous.
    Demons are portrayed as disembodied spirits -- not angels.
    Last edited by Cow Poke; 08-07-2014 at 09:10 PM.

    1 Tim 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.

  7. #16
    tWebber Jesse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Salem, Oregon
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    1,342
    Amen (Given)
    1481
    Amen (Received)
    661
    Quote Originally Posted by Cow Poke View Post
    Demons are portrayed as disembodied spirits -- not angels.
    Exactly. If an angel becomes demonic, they become disembodied, i.e. separated from or existing without a body. The Bible does not declare the angels of Genesis 6 demonic. They were punished after the fact.
    "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." ― C.S. Lewis, God in the Dock: Essays on Theology (Making of Modern Theology)

  8. #17
    tWebber whag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Agnostic
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    3,163
    Amen (Given)
    454
    Amen (Received)
    337
    Quote Originally Posted by Jesse View Post
    J.P. makes a good case for angels (dimensional beings) in Genesis 6. Of course he is not the only one. We know nothing of the physical makeup of these beings so how would it be considered preposterous? The Bible states in many passages about angels having physical manifestations: Acts 12:5-12, Genesis 19:1-7, Genesis 19:10-13.

    So if they can touch you, eat with you etc. then yes, they can possibly manifest compatible sexual organs and sperm. I don't see how if angels (again dimensional beings) are real, any of this would be preposterous.
    Preposterous in the scientific sense. Biologists have no methodology to test for what you described.

    I'd argue it's also preposterous in theological sense. It entails the belief that God unleashed horny inter-dimensional beings that can reproduce with human women. That doesn't happen by accident.

  9. Amen klaus54, Duragizer amen'd this post.
  10. #18
    tWebber
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    2,749
    Amen (Given)
    195
    Amen (Received)
    713
    Who says it had to be done via sexual reproduction. Technology doesn't evolve in the supernatural realm like it does in the human realm.

  11. #19
    tWebber tabibito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    DownUnder
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    3,658
    Amen (Given)
    151
    Amen (Received)
    548
    Quote Originally Posted by whag View Post
    It's realistic that we bred with other species. We have a propensity to multiply.


    It's preposterous to think that species was the legend that Genesis describes. Angels are spirit. How would they have compatible reproductive apparatus with human beings?
    The genesis account says "sons of God". Lots of free-play with that term. Angels is only likely.
    και εκζητησατε με και ευρησετε με οτι ζητησετε με εν ολη καρδία υμων

  12. #20
    tWebber whag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Agnostic
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    3,163
    Amen (Given)
    454
    Amen (Received)
    337
    Quote Originally Posted by seanD View Post
    Who says it had to be done via sexual reproduction. Technology doesn't evolve in the supernatural realm like it does in the human realm.
    Our sexual apparatus isn't "technology," for one. Second, the daughters were physical not metaphysical. They had primate wombs made of meat.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •