Originally posted by klaus54
View Post
and then . the other "Evolution" , the observed (and sometimes directed) industrial application, observable process:
"Current challenges and promises of white biotechnology encourage protein engineers to use a directed evolution approach to generate novel and useful biocatalysts for various sets of applications. Different methods of enzyme engineering have been used in the past in an attempt to produce enzymes with improved functions and properties"
"...In a process called “directed evolution” scientists re-enact natural evolution in the laboratory: they iteratively mutate an enzyme and select for mutants with the desired feature. Within months, directed evolution can increase an enzyme’s ability to catalyze a particular reaction by as much as 1000-fold—and sometimes even beyond. “In the past five years alone, there have been over 60 publications containing examples of directed evolution of enzymes for industrial processes,” says Gert Kiss, PhD, a postdoc at Stanford University, who collaborates closely with David Baker, PhD, professor of biochemistry at the University of Washington and a pioneer in directed enzyme evolution..."
yeah, that second one is a fact.
and its used to imply the first one has been proved.
When you cite industrial application "evolution" and say, "see, evolution is both a theory and a fact", I think you (not just you, but Darwinists IN GENERAL, know that your listener will go away thinking we have a non human ape ancestor, or share a non human common ancestor with other animals.
Comment