Calvinism v Materialism

  • Aggressive
  • Amazed
  • Amused
  • Angelic
  • Angry
  • Artistic
  • Asleep
  • Bashful
  • Blah
  • Bored
  • Breezy
  • Brooding
  • Busy
  • Buzzed
  • Chatty
  • Cheeky
  • Cheerful
  • Cloud 9
  • Cold
  • Cold Turkey
  • Confused
  • Cool
  • Crappy
  • Curious
  • Cynical
  • Daring
  • Dead
  • Depressed
  • Devilish
  • Doh
  • Doubtful
  • Drunk
  • Energetic
  • Fiendish
  • Fine
  • Flirty
  • Gloomy
  • Goofy
  • Grumpy
  • Happy
  • Hot
  • Hung Over
  • In Love
  • In Pain
  • Innocent
  • Inspired
  • Lonely
  • Lurking
  • Mellow
  • Mischievious
  • Nerdy
  • None
  • Not Worthy
  • Paranoid
  • Pensive
  • Psychedelic
  • Question
  • Relaxed
  • ROFLMAO
  • Sad
  • Scared
  • Shocked
  • Sick
  • Sleepy
  • Sneaky
  • Snobbish
  • Spaced
  • Stressed
  • Sunshine
  • Sweet Tooth
  • Thinking
  • Tired
  • Twisted
  • Vegged Out
  • Worried
  • Yee Haw
  • Results 1 to 3 of 3
    1. #1
      Andrew's Avatar
      Andrew is offline tWebber
      ---
       
      Join Date
      February 2nd, 2003
      Location
      Sydney
      Posts
      246
      Male - Christian
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Calvinism v Materialism

      I have seen Calvinists argue that a materialist worldview doesn't provide the preconditions for free will. I would like to know how they reason this. How is it that God foreordaining everything (even electrons, etc., are under providential control) provides the preconditions for free will but 'foreordination' by physical determinism does not?

      Commentary by FiveSolas particularly encouraged.

    2. #2
      Solly's Avatar
      Solly is offline Ex-twebber
      ---
       
      Join Date
      January 27th, 2003
      Location
      Northampton
      Posts
      15,056
      Male - Christian (other)
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: Calvinism v Materialism

      Point of order: Calvinists believe in free moral action, not free will.
      Free will posits the idea of unrestrained action, and acausal action. We are free to act, and we are free to act contra-causally.
      Free moral action posits the idea of unrestrained action alone. We are free to act.

      Materialists, like Theists, are divided on the place and actuality of free will, so that writers like Robert Kane argue for it, and writers like Ted Honderich argue against it.
      Theistic determinism is not the same as mechanistic determinsm in which C follows B which follows A, ad infinitum, in an unbroken chain which theoretically could be investigated. Theistic determinism says, God causes or lets things happen by an act of will. Whether that means micro-managing electrons is not included in the biblical witness, since his foreordaining of things generally relates to human beings, and sinful ones at that. The doctrines of foreordination, foreknowledge, predestination, etc are there for our comfort (Article 17, Church of England articles), to remind us that things never get out of control. Calvin put it in Book 3 Christian Life, of his Institutes, and only later Refomred writers moved it up to the loci on God's decrees.

    3. #3
      ephphatha's Avatar
      ephphatha is offline tWebber
      ---
       
      Join Date
      December 10th, 2003
      Location
      texas
      Posts
      60
      Male - Christian
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: Calvinism v Materialism

      Andrew,

      It's not just Calvinists who argue that a materialist worldview doesn't provide the preconditions for freewill. C.S. Lewis wrote a chapter on it in his book on Miracles. I think it's the second or third chapter. He basically argued that if the materialist worldview is true, then everything, including our actions and beliefs, are deterministically caused. Only if the will resides outside of this causal chain (like in an immaterial soul) can we have free will.

      The difference between God's forordination and material determinism is that one is blind and mechanical while the other based on the will and decision of a sentient being.

      Solly is right that strictly speaking, Calvinists do not believe in acausal libertarian free will. Most Calvinists are compatibalists (Jonathan Edwards wrote an excellent book on the topic, The Freedom of the Will). There are some who believe in free will regarding non-moral choices, such as the choice to drink Dr. Pepper rather than Sprite or something like that. But none believe we have free will in regards to our choice to accept or reject Christ.

      ephphatha

    Similar Threads

    1. Free Though And Materialism
      By seer in forum Philosophy 201
      Replies: 17
      Last Post: February 28th 2010, 12:01 PM
    2. But what is materialism?
      By FreezBee in forum Natural Science 301
      Replies: 49
      Last Post: February 21st 2008, 03:29 AM
    3. Eliminative Materialism
      By Philosophickle in forum Philosophy 201
      Replies: 29
      Last Post: May 2nd 2006, 11:50 PM
    4. Definition of Calvinism/Hyper Calvinism is Incorrect
      By Jimby_Aus in forum Theology 201
      Replies: 32
      Last Post: February 28th 2006, 12:06 AM
    5. Morality And Materialism...
      By seer in forum Apologetics 301
      Replies: 91
      Last Post: March 15th 2004, 12:55 PM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •