Which you have yet to do in any capacity, mainly because you're unable to make a distinction between active conspiracy and passive collusion, between leads and evidence, and between truth and lies. You and Spartacus cannot discuss the issue because you redefine words and terms on the fly while utterly failing to deal with the claims in any manner that indicates you have any experience with the issues involved.
Oh I would love to talk about immigration problems. But the problem is, I want to talk about it seriously. Not using factless conjecture and VDare conspiracies. I will happily give you that you probably know more about conspiracy issues than I do. I take very little stock in them so naturally I don't waste my time reading them.
You can now go on to continue to believe you are saving the world against Spartacus and I. Something you might want to look up is "delusions of grandeur". Because I fear that you being a blade, are really too dull to cut through your own B.S.
Comment