Thread: The Holy Prepuce
September 14th 2004, 03:23 PM #1
The Holy Prepuce
Today's featured Wikipedia article is fascinating. I offer the article here for contemplation and discussion.
The Holy Prepuce, or Holy Foreskin (Latin prćputium) is one of the various relics purported to be associated with Jesus Christ. At various points in history, a number of churches in Europe have claimed to possess it, sometimes at the same time. Various miraculous powers have been ascribed to it.
Orthodox Christian belief has it that Jesus ascended bodily into Heaven forty days after his resurrection from the dead. This would mean that Jesus' foreskin (removed at his circumcision) would be one of the few physical remainders of Jesus left behind on Earth. It is worth noting that the modern, peri'ah style of circumcision did not become the standard mode until around the time of the revolt led by Simon bar Kokhba in AD 132–135. The style of circumcision practised by Palestinian Jews prior to bar Kokhba removed only the 'tip' of the foreskin, not all of it. Thus modern, and probably medieval as well, ideas of what Jesus' foreskin would be like were, and are wide of the mark. There was also some theological dispute as to whether Jesus can really be said to have ascended wholly into Heaven if this part of his body was actually missing. This was resolved by noting that his foreskin was no more an obstacle to this than the hair and fingernails that he had cut throughout his life or blood he may have shed.
A related theological issue questions whether Jesus' foreskin was restored to him in his resurrected body. The act of circumcision was a ritual of profound religious significance to Jews, and marked their membership in the covenant community. The New Testament contains extensive discussions about whether circumcision was needed for Gentile converts, and concludes that it was not; the position settled upon is that Jesus' crucifixion established a new covenant for Christians for which the rite was not necessary.
But, when God achieves something by miracle, it seems arbitrary to propose limits to what that miracle can restore. In Mark 12:18-25, Jesus responded to the Sadducees' question about marriage after the resurrection, saying that "When the dead rise, they will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven." (NIV) This suggests that the resurrected dead may have certain anatomical differences that may make the question moot. But then again, he may have restored the foreskin in heaven without taking the discarded one away from earth.
http://en.wikipedia.org/upload/7/7a/Clement7.JPG In the 16th century, Pope Clement VII ruled that the Holy Prepuce was authentic.
The abbey of Charroux claimed to possess the Holy Foreskin during the Middle Ages. It was said to have been presented to the monks by none other than Charlemagne, who in turn is said to have claimed that it had been brought to him by an angel (although another version of the story says it was a wedding gift from the Byzantine Empress Irene). In the early 12th century, it was taken in procession to Rome where it was presented before Pope Innocent III, who was asked to rule on its authenticity. The Pope declined the opportunity. Later, however, Pope Clement VII declared it to be a true relic, and granted an indulgence to pilgrims who went to visit it. At some point, however, the relic went missing, and remained lost until 1856 when a workman repairing the abbey claimed to have found a reliquary hidden inside a wall, containing the missing foreskin.
The abbey church of Coulombs in the diocese of Chartres, France was another medieval claimant. One story says that when Catherine of Valois was pregnant in 1421, her husband, King Henry V of England, sent for the Holy Prepuce. It was believed that the sweet scent that the relic was supposed to give off would ensure an easy and safe childbirth. According to this legend, it did its job so well that Henry was reluctant to return it after the birth of the child (the future King Henry VI of England).
The authenticity of the Holy Foreskin claimed by the St. John Lateran church in Rome is said to have been proven in 1527, when the troops of Holy Roman Emperor Charles V sacked Rome. The relic fell into their hands for a time, and was allegedly put to the test by bringing a virgin girl before it, whereupon the foreskin enlarged, as it seems would have been expected in such circumstances.
Other claimants in history have included the Cathedral of Le Puy-en-Velay, Santiago de Compostela, the city of Antwerp, and churches in Besançon, Metz, Hildesheim, and Calcata.
Calcata is worthy of special mention, as the reliquary containing the Holy Foreskin was paraded through the streets of this Italian village as recently as 1983 on the Feast of the Circumcision (marked by the Catholic church around the world on January 1 each year). The practice ended, however, when thieves stole the jewel-encrusted case, contents and all. Following this theft, it is unclear whether any of the purported Holy Prepuces still exist. In a 1997 television documentary for Channel 4, British journalist Miles Kington travelled to Italy in search of the Holy Foreskin, but was unable to find any remaining example.
Over the last century or so, the emphasis placed on relics by the Catholic church has declined markedly, with many relics with long traditions being relegated to "pious legend" by the Vatican. Interest in the Holy Foreskins has been specifically downplayed, with the observation in 1900 that these particular relics encouraged 'irreverent curiosity'.
Assuming that it is possible that one of these foreskins is in fact Jesus Christ's, its preservation may raise the possibility of cloning when that technology is perfected for humans; compare with the fictional Kahless.
According to a 17th century theologian, the foreskin may have divinely ascended to become the rings of Saturn.
Apart from its physical importance as a relic, the Holy Foreskin appeared in a famous vision of Saint Catherine of Siena. In the vision, Jesus mystically marries her, and his amputated foreskin is given to her as a wedding ring.
During the late 17th century, Catholic scholar and theologian Leo Allatius in De Praeputio Domini Nostri Jesu Christi Diatriba ("Discussion concerning the Prepuce of our Lord Jesus Christ") speculated that the Holy Foreskin may have ascended into Heaven at the same time as Jesus himself and might have become the rings of Saturn, then only recently observed by telescope.
Voltaire, in A Treatise of Toleration (1763), ironically referred to veneration of the Holy Foreskin as being one of a number of superstitions that were "much more reasonable... than to detest and persecute your brother"."'tis usual for men to use words for ideas, and to talk instead of thinking in their reasonings." A Treatise of Human Nature, I.II.V.
September 14th 2004, 03:47 PM #2
Re: The Holy PrepuceOriginally posted by Seasanctuary
September 14th 2004, 03:47 PM #3
Re: The Holy Prepuce"This is my simple religion. There is no need for temples; no need for complicated philosophy. Our own brain, our own heart is our temple; the philosophy is kindness." HH Tenzing Gyatzo, the 14th Dalai Lama
"Omni mutantur, nihil interit" Ovid
"Accept the consequences of a free society, or go home and crawl under the bed where all the mean mean boogiemen can't get you." Sweet Mercury
Random Neurons Firing (my blog)
September 14th 2004, 04:04 PM #4
Re: The Holy Prepuce
I gotta add the following caveat about Wikipedia.
From their site:
Obviously, none of the articles come with any authority automatically attached to them. YOU! and even I, can write on any subject we wish and get it placed in Wikipedia.
September 14th 2004, 05:46 PM #5
Re: The Holy Prepuce
Minnesota, want to collaborate on the DeeDee Warren article?"'tis usual for men to use words for ideas, and to talk instead of thinking in their reasonings." A Treatise of Human Nature, I.II.V.
By sonofyah in forum Unorthodox Theology 201Replies: 38Last Post: February 5th 2011, 08:38 PM
By Chappie in forum Theology 201Replies: 18Last Post: June 2nd 2010, 09:39 AM
By Beukeboom in forum Rec RoomReplies: 0Last Post: June 22nd 2009, 01:21 PM
By Jude3b in forum Ecclesiology 201Replies: 53Last Post: October 4th 2006, 03:36 AM
By $cirisme in forum AmphitheaterReplies: 3Last Post: May 11th 2005, 12:25 AM