Thread: Lets start the Trinity thread
-
January 27th 2003, 10:40 AM #1
Lets start the Trinity thread
In this thread I woudl like to discuss both the importance of the Trinity and the nature of the Trinity. As a starter-- I would say that the Trinity is an essential doctrine as it has many implications not only on other theological postions but on our actions. If one holds to an Arian vew [i.e. the Son and the Holy Spirit are seperate/jr. beings] then it will lead to abuse of power and de-huminization of women. If one holds to a mutual submission view then itwill lead to a break down in the social order. It is for that reason that I beleive the only appropriate view is the eternal subordination of the Son to the Father and the eternal subordination of the Holy Spirit to the Father and the Son.
[I have intentionally been dogmatic in this post with no Biblical citations to start the debate, not as a defense of my position]
Let the debating begin!
-
January 27th 2003, 01:39 PM #2
I believe that the trinity is one, but three seperate "positions." For instance, I am a son, a brother, and a friend. I am not three sepearate people, it's just me.
There is God, the Father. There is God, the Son and Redeemer of man, and God, the Holy Spirit who lives in all who accept Christ.A peanut is neither a pea nor a nut...I think
-
January 27th 2003, 04:26 PM #3
The Trinity is three persons.
I happen to be a researcher for various online organizations when it comes to Ornithology. What I am is a Ornithologist. The dictionary says an Ornithologist is a person who is "a zoologist who studies birds." I'm also very convinced of the truth of God's word when it comes to origins. (Creationist)
-
January 27th 2003, 04:44 PM #4
**7**say hey ibowatjesusfeet, ya said--
I believe that the trinity is one, but three seperate "positions." For instance, I am a son, a brother, and a friend. I am not three sepearate people, it's just me.
**8** hmm. while your desire to reject tritheism is undoubtedly correct, you're falling into the error of modalism. the Father is not the Son; the Son is not the Spirit; the Spirit is not the Father. they are three distinct persons, each of whom necessarily presupposes the existence of the other two.
peace.
-
January 27th 2003, 04:54 PM #5
Modalism is a ancient heresy that used to exist in the early church. Most of the church members were undoubtely Trinitarians in the fullest sense of the word. But there were some that weren't and they were condemned heretics. People back then defended the trinity and would die for it.
I happen to be a researcher for various online organizations when it comes to Ornithology. What I am is a Ornithologist. The dictionary says an Ornithologist is a person who is "a zoologist who studies birds." I'm also very convinced of the truth of God's word when it comes to origins. (Creationist)
-
January 27th 2003, 04:57 PM #6
Generally the orthodox Trinitarian presentation has been:
God is one. God is made up of three distinct persons. God has always existed as three distinct persons. Thus we have the teaching that these three distinct persons are not different modes of existence of the One God, but three distinct persons [Father, Son and Holy Spirit]. And to quote the phrase from the Arian controversy "There is not when he was not., which was to counter Arius's teaching that the Son is a later creation of the Father with his phrase, "There is when he was not."
So I would argue that the eternal subordination of the Son teaches us that within the God head there is equal value, but a definite hierarchy. {What I would not do to be near my Sys Theo books and note!} This gets us into the filioque clause of the clause, which split the church between teh East and West in the Middle Ages (1033 if I recall). In which it states that the Holy Spirit was sent by the Father [i]and the Son[/].
More food for thought.
GP
PS Ibow thanks for the post, and rememeber this is stuff that we will never get our heads around, we're just too small."Reading the Bible in a translation is like kissing your bride through the veil."
Rabbinic Saying"To suppose that whatever God requireth of us that we have power of ourselves to do, is to make the cross and grace of Jesus Christ of none effect."
JOHN OWEN, III:433
-
January 27th 2003, 06:49 PM #7
This thread is like evangelion bait.
Just a note, $cir is right. -Sparko
-
January 27th 2003, 07:00 PM #8
questions regarding the Trinity
granting that there is only one God, and that this God is tripersonal, in what sense, then, is God "one"?
in what way are the Father, Son, and Spirit related to one another (ps graypilgrim, it was 1056 a.d.), and how do these relations effect/define that oneness?
peace
-
January 27th 2003, 07:08 PM #9
Thanks phantaz sunlyk for the date, I talked my self out of anything ending with a 6 thinking I was confusing it with 1066 and William the Conqueror.
"Reading the Bible in a translation is like kissing your bride through the veil."
Rabbinic Saying"To suppose that whatever God requireth of us that we have power of ourselves to do, is to make the cross and grace of Jesus Christ of none effect."
JOHN OWEN, III:433
-
January 27th 2003, 07:43 PM #10
We need an anti-Trin invite. Someone logical and rational for once, eh?
"AV" does not stand for "Authorized Version"
-
January 27th 2003, 08:08 PM #11
Contact Brandon K from CARM.. The meanest, toughest, and most "illogical" anti-Trinitarian there is. 'Nuff said'.
I happen to be a researcher for various online organizations when it comes to Ornithology. What I am is a Ornithologist. The dictionary says an Ornithologist is a person who is "a zoologist who studies birds." I'm also very convinced of the truth of God's word when it comes to origins. (Creationist)
-
January 27th 2003, 08:11 PM #12
I'm not sure I follow the logic of a subordinate spirit and Son leading to the bad treatment of women?
-
January 27th 2003, 09:00 PM #13
Egomanion
Egomanion has started his own private forum where he can talk to those who admire his brilliance.Originally posted by cirisme
This thread is like evangelion bait.
Let's see....himself...his brother....
I guess that's it.
http://www.tektoonics.com
Due to rampant stupidity by Skeptics, and time issues, I'm only going to be on TWeb in my own (tektonics.org) section from now on. Deal with it.
-
January 27th 2003, 09:03 PM #14And you're clergy of the Presbyterian Church?Originally posted by Pilgrim
I'm not sure I follow the logic of a subordinate spirit and Son leading to the bad treatment of women?I happen to be a researcher for various online organizations when it comes to Ornithology. What I am is a Ornithologist. The dictionary says an Ornithologist is a person who is "a zoologist who studies birds." I'm also very convinced of the truth of God's word when it comes to origins. (Creationist)
-
January 27th 2003, 09:04 PM #15
Hmm, I see subordination of the Son and Spirit to the Father, but not sure about the Spirit to the Son.
For true conversion, click here.
Similar Threads
-
I was wrong to start that last thread on Election.
By GoBahnsen in forum Theology 201Replies: 88Last Post: October 9th 2006, 04:46 PM -
lets help Tizzi spam thread
By luv1another in forum Rec RoomReplies: 150Last Post: December 9th 2004, 10:58 PM















































































Quote

Another example of the...
Today, 12:54 PM in Natural Science 301