Thread: Reincarnation: Karma or Gospel
-
February 15th 2005, 08:19 PM #106
Re: Requirements for the Path
[QUOTE=Crusader]
Originally posted by Vivian
Ha, that would be a direct contradiction, then, of what these people in the Dark Ages thought, the "the doctrine of Vicarious Atonement."
But, even they must admit to at least one coming "reincarnation," I guess.
Rev. 20:5 But the rest of the dead lived not again (during the Monastic era of Universal Catholicism) until the thousand years (of the Dark Age, 600AD-1600AD) were finished. This is the first resurrection.
But, it still seems clear that the secular understanding of Genetics supports ideas of Christian resurrection and eastern reincarnation to some degree. Neither of these two metaphysical concepts ever had any concrete basis in secular understanding, though.
Both have always requiring total faith in some unclear revival of the dead.
And, the Christian scripture adds another element to the resurrection, namely that there will be no more death at all. nThis is distinctly different from both Karma and any previous Christian suggestion.
This is different because itmakes the idea of resurrection/reincarnation a permanent condition. How? Christian apologists have offered no clue.
Revelation 21:4-5 And God shall wipe away, (in their awakened Unconscious Mind), all tears from their eyes, (for life is a continuum from one generation to the next living generation); and (in genetic memories of prior existences held in our Unconscious Mind) there shall be no more death, neither sorrow (for we, individually, are part of a living continuum of our own pasts), nor crying (for we are happy in these revelations), neither shall there be any more pain (as circumvented by hypnosis today): for the former things (in Modern Homo sapiens life experience) are passed away.
And he, (the ancient, phylogenetic, Collective Unconscious Mind), that sat upon the throne (of the Homoiousian sapiens' brain) said, Behold, (in this way) I make all things (in human experience) new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true (rational, and scientifically feasible) and (worthy of) faithful (belief).
-
February 15th 2005, 08:53 PM #107
Re: Requirements for the Path
I like your choice in Proverbs.
Originally posted by Vivian
Wisdom is supreme; therefore get wisdom.
I am reminded that wisdom is similar to creativity. It is hard to just "get." We can not enroll in Wisdom 101, nor would we believe that the professor could actually teach it.
But, scripture seems the embodiment of wisdom, at least, undeniably the Hebrew Wisdom.
In consulting the Bible, applying its Wisdom to our discussion here, I am reminded about Understanding, as that understanding applies to the words of early Christian fathers.
"Their day was in the wrong time."
They had less chance of understanding than perhaps we might.
Sincerity, yes. Above common insights, being closer to the moment of crucifixion, yes.
But there skills, their academics, their world view was restricted, especially emphasized by an enormous lacking in competition. Ancient scholarship being a much rarer comodity in that time, these were smart men among very few to select from, indeed.
But, wisdom lies, so obvious to me, in censoring any authority they might invoke, Clement or Origen.
Their day was in the wrong time.
These were/are hard questions: life after death.
The concept of life after death was intentionally not explicitly revealed to them in scripture. And, the wisdom of Daniel clearly locks up any guess they might have submitted:
Dan. 12:4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words (of the Old Testament), and seal the book (read by many concerned with death and hell), even to (2K4AD), the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, (traveling freely by land, sea, and even air), and knowledge (in the Information Age) shall be increased.
Indeed:
Though it cost all you have, get understanding.
Daniel seems easily understood. Clement et al had qualified guesses, but correct answers explicitly denied them by prophesy of Daniel:
"...seal the book even to the time of the end"...
-
February 16th 2005, 02:44 AM #108
Re: Requirements for the Path
Hello Crusader,
Originally posted by Crusader
No, I did miss it before.
Eye of God must be referring to His "Senses", but it matters not for Clement goes on to say that we are the Word as such have existed since the beginning.
Before the beginning, there was only One Infinite Spirit. (Do you feel the smiles and tingles in thinking of an Infinite moment before creation when All was simply God enjoying Himself in Perfect Quiesent Bliss?) The One and Only Infinite Spirit had a stirring, a thought, to experience Itself in individualization. And this thought came forth from Him as His Word and is the energy force behind all creation.
Aye. But Jesus knew that his disciples would be incarnating again and again and again up until the time that Christ returned.
Originally posted by Crusader
Originally posted by Crusader
I know that the above is not exactly the whole truth. For in the Christian religious tradition disagreement over the meaning of scripture is readily accepted.
If it all added up, there would be no disparities in interpretations, just a joining together in the One Absolute Truth.
vivianLast edited by Vivian; February 16th 2005 at 02:45 AM. Reason: typos
For you bless the righteous, Oh Yahweh, you cover them with favor as with a shield. Psalm 5:12
-
February 16th 2005, 03:59 AM #109
Re: Requirements for the Path
Originally posted by kofh2u
Wisdom is Divine Love in action.
And like you said, david, it isn't something you get, but something you enter into with an elevated consciousness. For those who are uncomforatble with the word consciousness, may I offer this to you...
If you have a spectrum and on one end is Thinking like Father and on the other end is thinking like a fallen being, it would look like this.
The Father------------------------------------------------------Fallen Man
Unity------------------------------------------------------------Separation
One-------------------------------------------------------------Me
A consciousness elevates when it is lifted out of self focused concerns. The more it expands into unity with All that has been created, the more God-like it is. Thoughts of self are heavy, weighty, dead like. Thoughts of others are light and spirited and full of Life.
The person who keeps himself cleaned of all wrong vibrations produces a powerful uplifting effect on his contemporaries. One moon gives more luster than all the stars; so a mooned soul - one who purely reflects the light of God - can influence the masses much more than the masses influence each other. Thus, individual effort can be even more important than mass karma. One who in every way tries to uplift himself, harmonizing body, mind, and soul with the Divine, creates positive karma not only in his own life, but in his family, neighborhood, country, and world. Hence it is not justified to say, “Thousands of people are misbehaving, so what does it matter if I am, too? “ No! The goodness of one soul may effectively neutralize the mass karma of millions.
Each drop of water contributes to the existence of the ocean. So even if one’s life seems no more than a droplet of water in the sea of humanity, that life can have a significant influence. One who makes himself god-like automatically uplifts countless others on the divine path. One who makes himself evil demotes others from the spiritual plane by a negative effect on their potential weaknesses. He who has reformed himself has reformed thousands; for what one sows in the ether, by the vibrations of his thought and character, others will surely reap. - Yogananda
vivianFor you bless the righteous, Oh Yahweh, you cover them with favor as with a shield. Psalm 5:12
-
February 19th 2005, 10:30 AM #110
Re: Requirements for the Path
Who is Jesus? Was he a man who was "god-like"?
Originally posted by Vivian
-
February 19th 2005, 10:35 AM #111
Re: Reincarnation: Karma or Gospel
Carl Jung was a Nazis until 1945, and a leader of a Sun cult. He boasted of his sexual experiences, and many years later it was discovered that he had seduced his niece, or a cousin.
Originally posted by kofh2u
Now, we shouldn't throw out all of the wisdom of Freud or Jung, just because they were Atheists, or Anti-Christ, but buyer beware.
-
February 19th 2005, 10:39 AM #112
Re: Reincarnation: Karma or Gospel
What was this thread topic again?

Originally posted by richbee
-
February 21st 2005, 08:57 PM #113
Re: Requirements for the Path
Jesus was a son of man - a physical being that came forth from his mother's womb - and he was/is a son of God - meaning that his consciousness was/is One with Christ and as such One with the Father.
Originally posted by Proteus
He was the Christ manifested or incarnated into this world.
vivianFor you bless the righteous, Oh Yahweh, you cover them with favor as with a shield. Psalm 5:12
-
February 21st 2005, 11:34 PM #114
Re: Requirements for the Path
Sort of.
Originally posted by Proteus
Christ is/was the next advancement for man, a new species evolving, mentally, into a more full level of Consciousness. In a number of steps, he demonstrated the process for us.
Matt. 17:2 And was transfigured, (becoming totally conscious, even in his Unconscious Mind, the phylogenetic storehouse of our Ancient of ancients), right before
them: and his face did shine as the sun, (as had the face of Moses), and his raiment was white as the light.
-
March 14th 2005, 11:52 PM #115
Re: Requirements for the Path
This is New Age rubbish! The Bible doesn't support this false teaching.
Originally posted by kofh2u
Not really heresy, as no Christian believes this or teaches this.
Jesus was born the Son of God, and has never changed and never needed to change or "become totally conscious". Jesus didn't become a god, Jesus always was and is God. "Before Abraham was born I AM" - John 8:58
Where ever you bought this false teaching, you need to go back and get your money back!Last edited by Proteus; March 15th 2005 at 12:00 AM.
-
March 15th 2005, 12:25 AM #116
Re: Requirements for the Path
Proteus:
This is New Age rubbish! The Bible doesn't support this false teaching.
KOFHY: new? New Age?
Rev. 21:1 And I saw a NEW HEAVEN (of Total Consciousness) and a NEW EARTH (from the sociological behaviors resulting) thereafter: for the first heaven (of semi-consciousness) and the first earth (of Paganistic practices) were passed away; and there was no more sea (of unconscious
behavior).
Proteus:
Not really heresy, as no Christian believes this or teaches this.
KOFHY:
Proteus:
Jesus was born the Son of God, and has never changed and never needed to change or "become totally conscious".
KOFHY:
What was his Transfiguration?
Proteus:
Jesus didn't become a god, Jesus always was and is God. "Before Abraham was born I AM" - John 8:58
KOFHY:
True.
Proteus:
Where ever you bought this false teaching, you need to go back and get your money back!
KOFHY:
It is the same teaching understandable in terms of today.
Revelation 21:4-5 And God shall wipe away, (in their awakened Unconscious Mind), all tears from their eyes, (for life is a continuum from one generation to the next living generation); and (in genetic memories of prior existences held in our Unconscious Mind) there shall be no more death, neither sorrow (for we, individually, are part of a living continuum of our own pasts), nor crying (for we are happy in these revelations), neither shall there be any more pain (as circumvented by hypnosis today): for the former things (in Modern Homo sapiens life experience) are passed away.
And he, (the ancient, phylogenetic, Collective Unconscious Mind), that sat upon the throne (of the Homoiousian sapiens' brain) said, Behold, (in this way) I make all things (in human experience) new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true (rational, and scientifically feasible) and (worthy of) faithful (belief).
-
March 31st 2005, 11:49 PM #117
Re: Requirements for the Path
Originally posted by kofh2u
All false again! When we get to heaven we will have new bodies!
Not really a "new consciousness" but a whole new reality, clear of the dark glass or dim view.
Can you get your money back on those false teachings?
-
April 1st 2005, 01:51 PM #118
Re: Requirements for the Path
Originally posted by Proteus
Analyze this and see if it isn't both, scriptural and a 21st century way of saying the same thing you have in mind but in words of days and people in the past:
Rev. 2:7 He that hath an ear, (an open mind), let him hear (and contemplate) what the (seven fold) Spirit, (the Human Psyche'), saith unto the (seven) churches, (the seven Eric Ericson passages of the socially evolving body of christianity: [Rev 1:20]);
To him that overcometh, (who sublimates beyond the common scriptural misunderstandings: [Rev 3:18]), will I give to eat (eternally) of the (biological) tree of (animal and plant) life, which is in the midst of the (creation's) paradise (of living creatures here on earth) of (the) God (of the Living).
Rev. 22:2 In the midst of the street of it, (the New Jerusalem: [Rev 21:16]), and on either side of the river (of the massive ensuing Homoiousian sapiens evolution), was there the (biological) tree of (animal and plant) life, which bare twelve manner of (human) fruits, (one for each of man's twelve Jungian Functional Psychological Thinking perspectives: [Rev 21:12], each a distinct philosophical outlook or Myers/Briggs predisposition), and yielded her fruit (of these twelve new types of evolving creatures, Homoiousian sapiens), every month (in accord with the human menstral cycle): and the (unfolding) leaves of (the ensuing generations of) the tree (of biological life) were for the healing of the nations, (the geo-political and religious social entities).
Rev. 22:14 Blessed are they that do his (two) commandments: ([Matt 22:40], to love what is becoming, what is to live with men: [Zech. 12:8], YHVH: [Rev 21:22-23], and to love all men, too, who, themselves, are becoming Homoiousians: [1Co 15:52]), that they may have right to (evolve within) the (ever growing biological) tree of life, and may enter in, (awakening in a fuller Consciousness) through the gates (of the ancient, genetically reproduced, Collective Unconscious Mind within men which was, before even Abraham was: [John 8:58]), into (the New Jerusalem), the city (of the new human philosophical paradigm which is modeled geometrically as a cube: [Rev 21:16]).
-
April 18th 2005, 09:21 PM #119
Re: Reincarnation: Karma or Gospel
Good News or Bad News?
The message of reincarnation is ultimately bad news. You must earn your own salvation through countless lifetimes and no one can help you. The message of Jesus is good news. No, you can’t save yourself. But Jesus left heaven and came to earth to rescue you. He died to pay the just penalty for your sin. He rose from the dead to demonstrate his authority as the Son of God (Rom. 1:4). And he asks you to turn from your old ways to follow him. He said:
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life (John 3:16).
All who believe in him and give their lives to him are freed from the fear of death and the penalty of sin. They can rejoice in these words of Jesus:
I am the resurrection and the life. Those who believe in me, even though they die, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. (John 11:25, 26, NRSV).
Similar Threads
-
Karma and Christianity
By JillPole in forum Unorthodox Theology 201Replies: 22Last Post: June 14th 2006, 12:09 PM -
Bono on Grace v. Karma
By Faramir in forum AmphitheaterReplies: 4Last Post: August 2nd 2005, 03:43 PM -
Buddhism, Karma, and Reincarnation
By BlackOpal12 in forum Comparative Religions 101Replies: 9Last Post: January 21st 2005, 08:23 AM -
The “Sorrow” of Pantheism/Reincarnation/Karma
By seang200 in forum Comparative Religions 101Replies: 26Last Post: August 22nd 2003, 05:18 PM















































































Quote


Revelation was written during...
Yesterday, 08:17 PM in Eschatology 201