Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: New Skull Could Be from Human Group that Interbred with Neandertals

  1. #1
    tWebber shunyadragon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Hillsborough, NC
    Faith
    Agnostic
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    12,530
    Amen (Given)
    1215
    Amen (Received)
    830

    New Skull Could Be from Human Group that Interbred with Neandertals

    Source: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-skull-could-be-from-human-group-that-interbred-with-neandertals/?WT.mc_id=SA_DD_20150130



    New Skull Could Be from Human Group that Interbred with Neandertals

    A 55,000-year-old incomplete skull found in Israel may belong to a human group that interbred with Neanderthals. Discovered deep in a cave by amateur speleologists, the partial cranium also fills a major gap in the fossil record of Homo sapiens’ journey from Africa to Europe.

    “Here we actually hold a skull of a human being that was living next to the Neanderthals,” says Israel Hershkovitz, the leader of a study published today in Nature (I. Hershkovitz et al. Nature http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14134; 2015). “Potentially he is the one that could interbreed with the Neanderthals,” says Hershkovitz, who is a physical anthropologist at Tel Aviv University in Israel.

    Genome studies of Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis) and of both ancient and contemporary H. sapiens suggest that the two species interbred somewhere in the Middle East between 50,000 and 60,000 years ago (Q. Fu et al. Nature 514, 445–449; 2014). But the problem with this idea is that no remains of anatomically modern humans have been discovered in the Middle East from this crucial period, after H. sapiens left Africa and before it colonized Europe and Asia.

    In 2008, a bulldozer clearing land for a development near the Sea of Galilee in northern Israel revealed an opening to a limestone cave that had been sealed for more than 15,000 years. Amateur speleologists were the first to explore the cave, and they spotted the battered bone—the top portion of a skull—resting on a ledge. The Israel Antiquities Authority soon launched a complete survey of Manot Cave, finding buried stone tools at several spots that are still being excavated.

    The skull was unquestionably from H. sapiens, says Hershkovitz: it was similar in shape to those of earlier African and later European humans. A patina of calcite coated the fragment, and the researchers used radioactive uranium in the mineral to date the bone to about 55,000 years old. That means that “the Manot people are probably the forefathers of the early Palaeolithic populations of Europe”, Hershkovitz says.

    The Manot people are also a leading candidate for the humans that bred with Neanderthals—exploits that have given all of today’s non-African humans a sliver of Neanderthal heritage. The Manot Cave is not far from two other sites that held Neanderthal remains of a similar age. “The southern Levant is the only place where anatomically modern humans and Neanderthals were living side by side for thousands and thousands of years,” Hershkovitz says. The ultimate proof would be to look for the presence of Neanderthal ancestry in DNA from the skull, but the region’s balmy temperatures mean that ancient DNA is unlikely to have been preserved.

    Jean-Jacques Hublin, a palaeoanthropologist at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, agrees that the chances of recovering DNA from the skull fragment are slim. But he hopes that further excavations will find human remains that have stayed cool enough to still contain DNA. These digs might also connect the skull to stone tools and other relics of daily life, which could strengthen the Manot skull’s link to early Europeans. The artefacts uncovered so far are thought to be much younger than the skull. “We have a skull, and we have a site where there is some archaeology, but there is no link between the skull and the archaeology. It’s a bit annoying,” Hublin says.

    “This specimen is really important and exciting, as—assuming the dating is correct—it shows for the first time that modern humans existed in the Near East at the same time as Neanderthals,” says Katerina Harvati, a palaeoanthropologist at the University of Tübingen in Germany. “Until now we had no evidence that the two even coexisted in this region during this time period. So this is a crucial piece of the puzzle.”

    © Copyright Original Source

    Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
    Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
    But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:

    go with the flow the river knows . . .

    Frank

    I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.

  2. Amen klaus54, Jesse, whag amen'd this post.
  3. #2
    Evolution is God's ID rogue06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Southeastern U.S. of A.
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    35,939
    Amen (Given)
    834
    Amen (Received)
    14543
    Quote Originally Posted by shunyadragon View Post
    Source: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-skull-could-be-from-human-group-that-interbred-with-neandertals/?WT.mc_id=SA_DD_20150130



    New Skull Could Be from Human Group that Interbred with Neandertals

    A 55,000-year-old incomplete skull found in Israel may belong to a human group that interbred with Neanderthals. Discovered deep in a cave by amateur speleologists, the partial cranium also fills a major gap in the fossil record of Homo sapiens’ journey from Africa to Europe.

    “Here we actually hold a skull of a human being that was living next to the Neanderthals,” says Israel Hershkovitz, the leader of a study published today in Nature (I. Hershkovitz et al. Nature http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14134; 2015). “Potentially he is the one that could interbreed with the Neanderthals,” says Hershkovitz, who is a physical anthropologist at Tel Aviv University in Israel.

    Genome studies of Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis) and of both ancient and contemporary H. sapiens suggest that the two species interbred somewhere in the Middle East between 50,000 and 60,000 years ago (Q. Fu et al. Nature 514, 445–449; 2014). But the problem with this idea is that no remains of anatomically modern humans have been discovered in the Middle East from this crucial period, after H. sapiens left Africa and before it colonized Europe and Asia.

    In 2008, a bulldozer clearing land for a development near the Sea of Galilee in northern Israel revealed an opening to a limestone cave that had been sealed for more than 15,000 years. Amateur speleologists were the first to explore the cave, and they spotted the battered bone—the top portion of a skull—resting on a ledge. The Israel Antiquities Authority soon launched a complete survey of Manot Cave, finding buried stone tools at several spots that are still being excavated.

    The skull was unquestionably from H. sapiens, says Hershkovitz: it was similar in shape to those of earlier African and later European humans. A patina of calcite coated the fragment, and the researchers used radioactive uranium in the mineral to date the bone to about 55,000 years old. That means that “the Manot people are probably the forefathers of the early Palaeolithic populations of Europe”, Hershkovitz says.

    The Manot people are also a leading candidate for the humans that bred with Neanderthals—exploits that have given all of today’s non-African humans a sliver of Neanderthal heritage. The Manot Cave is not far from two other sites that held Neanderthal remains of a similar age. “The southern Levant is the only place where anatomically modern humans and Neanderthals were living side by side for thousands and thousands of years,” Hershkovitz says. The ultimate proof would be to look for the presence of Neanderthal ancestry in DNA from the skull, but the region’s balmy temperatures mean that ancient DNA is unlikely to have been preserved.

    Jean-Jacques Hublin, a palaeoanthropologist at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, agrees that the chances of recovering DNA from the skull fragment are slim. But he hopes that further excavations will find human remains that have stayed cool enough to still contain DNA. These digs might also connect the skull to stone tools and other relics of daily life, which could strengthen the Manot skull’s link to early Europeans. The artefacts uncovered so far are thought to be much younger than the skull. “We have a skull, and we have a site where there is some archaeology, but there is no link between the skull and the archaeology. It’s a bit annoying,” Hublin says.

    “This specimen is really important and exciting, as—assuming the dating is correct—it shows for the first time that modern humans existed in the Near East at the same time as Neanderthals,” says Katerina Harvati, a palaeoanthropologist at the University of Tübingen in Germany. “Until now we had no evidence that the two even coexisted in this region during this time period. So this is a crucial piece of the puzzle.”

    © Copyright Original Source

    Meanwhile, at the opposite end of the Asian continent, the discovery of a mandible (jaw) between 60 to 120 meters (197 to 394') deep on the sea floor of the Penghu Channel west of Taiwan and may have come from a previously unknown species of early human that most closely resembles either a form of Homo erectus or Archaic Homo sapiens.






    Further reading:

    The first archaic Homo from Taiwan Abstract & Paper

    Big-toothed fossil may be primitive new human

    Ancient Human Fossil Could Be New Primitive Species

    An archaic human from the bed of the Taiwan Strait

    Fossil suggests 4th group of early humans

    I'm always still in trouble again

  4. Amen klaus54, Jesse, whag amen'd this post.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •