Originally posted by seer
View Post
You are changing your tune, you never said "in your context morality..." You made the claim that morality was neither rational or irrational. Don't blame me because you are now hedging.
And the fact is Tass a moral system void of justice is irrational. How could it be otherwise?
But that is not the point, it wouldn't matter what is least or most desirable (that may be too complicated to really understand anyway) it only matters what works - and what works can be quite relative.
It doesn't matter what I say. What the Europeans did in the Americas, or even in your country, to the natives, was good for the Europeans. Evolution in motion.
What lawmakers? Who were the lawmakers when the Europeans came to the Americas? That's right - the Europeans.
No you just need to admit that the bottom line is about survival and passing on ones genes. And that all your high talk about ethics is at worse meaningless or at best ancillary
Tass, you made the point that morality was neither rational or irrational - and you did it of your own free will!
Comment