More food for the hungry? Congress votes no.

  • Aggressive
  • Amazed
  • Amused
  • Angelic
  • Angry
  • Artistic
  • Asleep
  • Bashful
  • Blah
  • Bored
  • Breezy
  • Brooding
  • Busy
  • Buzzed
  • Chatty
  • Cheeky
  • Cheerful
  • Cloud 9
  • Cold
  • Cold Turkey
  • Confused
  • Cool
  • Crappy
  • Curious
  • Cynical
  • Daring
  • Dead
  • Depressed
  • Devilish
  • Doh
  • Doubtful
  • Drunk
  • Energetic
  • Fiendish
  • Fine
  • Flirty
  • Gloomy
  • Goofy
  • Grumpy
  • Happy
  • Hot
  • Hung Over
  • In Love
  • In Pain
  • Innocent
  • Inspired
  • Lonely
  • Lurking
  • Mellow
  • Mischievious
  • Nerdy
  • None
  • Not Worthy
  • Paranoid
  • Pensive
  • Psychedelic
  • Question
  • Relaxed
  • ROFLMAO
  • Sad
  • Scared
  • Shocked
  • Sick
  • Sleepy
  • Sneaky
  • Snobbish
  • Spaced
  • Stressed
  • Sunshine
  • Sweet Tooth
  • Thinking
  • Tired
  • Twisted
  • Vegged Out
  • Worried
  • Yee Haw
  • Results 1 to 6 of 6
    1. #1
      Soundsurfr's Avatar
      Soundsurfr is offline Everyone is a heretic
      ---
       
      Join Date
      March 15th, 2004
      Location
      New York
      Posts
      2,967
      Male - Unitarian Universalist
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      More food for the hungry? Congress votes no.

      Whaddya think folks? Good decision? Bad decision?


      http://www.newsday.com/news/printedi...-opinion-print
      Soundsurfr
      “Jesus' disciples at the Last Supper were certainly not wealthy enough to afford a clarinet to accompany them on the hymn -- or someone trained in music to do it for them.” – Anonymous Expert
      www.soundsurfr.com
      www.auraclemusic.com

    2. #2
      Darth Executor's Avatar
      Darth Executor is offline Supero Omnia
      Amused
       
      Join Date
      March 15th, 2005
      Location
      Oneiros
      Posts
      23,747
      Male - Christian
      Mentioned
      1 Post(s)

      Re: More food for the hungry? Congress votes no.

      Quote Originally posted by Soundsurfr
      Whaddya think folks? Good decision? Bad decision?


      http://www.newsday.com/news/printedi...-opinion-print
      When I read the topic title my first thought was "I'm not paying any taxes to feed any of them democrats". Now that I read it I'm not sure. On one side Africa needs the food but on the other the farmers need the business and taking it away from them might have a worse impact on the economy than the treasury can save through this move (and by connection, less money for foreign aid).
      "Years ago, I mean decades ago, I read a quote about politicians performing quid pro quo favors for campaign cash, and whether or not we could prove it. The guy who was quoted opined that it was difficult to determine. He noted that in many cases, the payoff might not take the form of votes on legislative action -- those might be detectable, and so are avoided -- but could take subtler forms, like the question that is never asked at a hearing.

      The media's doing a terrific job of not asking questions it doesn't want to know the answer to. It doesn't ask these questions in bulk, and the great volume of questions it doesn't ask makes it cheap to not ask questions.

      And it passes these savings on to you, the customer." Ace

    3. #3
      Blemonds's Avatar
      Blemonds is offline Defender of Democracy
      ---
       
      Join Date
      March 16th, 2003
      Posts
      4,323
      Male - Christian
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: More food for the hungry? Congress votes no.

      This would appear to be another example of a disingenuous thread title as the article does not address providing "more" food to the hungry, but rather the logistics of purchasing and delivering the food.

    4. #4
      BlackOpal12's Avatar
      BlackOpal12 is offline Eschew Obfuscation
      ---
       
      Join Date
      October 6th, 2003
      Location
      Cincinnati, Ohio
      Posts
      460
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: More food for the hungry? Congress votes no.

      Quote Originally posted by Kewlieluvr
      This would appear to be another example of a disingenuous thread title as the article does not address providing "more" food to the hungry, but rather the logistics of purchasing and delivering the food.
      Way to answer the question, Kewlie.

      I'd say that moving for the bill was a good idea on Mr. Bush's part. I must remain unsuprised its failure, however - the "American labor" tag really is very important to the businesses of our nation. At least those under a lot of scutiny.
      KFC's Slippery Slope: If we allow people to eat chicken, next they'll eat babies covered in a light breading with kitten pudding and biscuits.

      Be A Voice For An Abused Child - Learn About Your Region's Child Protection Organizations

    5. #5
      Rubia Warren's Avatar
      Rubia Warren is offline Love Ya Bandecoot
      ---
       
      Join Date
      January 26th, 2003
      Posts
      8,169
      Female - Christian
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: More food for the hungry? Congress votes no.

      Maybe I am just ignorant, but why can't the money be more focused on those countries feeding themselves? Or maybe there is a concentrated effort and I just don't know about it. I see the immediate need to ship food there because of a famine, but what is being done or what plans are in the works to help out with the means for doing it themselves?


    6. #6
      Zeluvia's Avatar
      Zeluvia is offline Happy Hippie
      ---
       
      Join Date
      December 11th, 2004
      Posts
      4,114
      Undisclosed - Bene Gesserit
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: More food for the hungry? Congress votes no.

      Quote Originally posted by rubia
      Maybe I am just ignorant, but why can't the money be more focused on those countries feeding themselves? Or maybe there is a concentrated effort and I just don't know about it. I see the immediate need to ship food there because of a famine, but what is being done or what plans are in the works to help out with the means for doing it themselves?
      http://www.actionaid.org.uk/100062/press_release.html

      Rubia, go to the bottom of the article and click on "see their story" then read the 8 stories of the 8 women.

      This will give you some idea of what the issues are from a personal perspective.

    Similar Threads

    1. Hungry
      By Jade in forum Rec Room
      Replies: 7
      Last Post: November 3rd 2008, 02:02 PM
    2. Fast food employees spitting in food
      By Tobias Reiper in forum Health Science 101
      Replies: 5
      Last Post: September 9th 2005, 10:20 AM
    3. Food for Hungry Christians by Chef Kreeft
      By Piebald in forum The Pulpit
      Replies: 1
      Last Post: August 31st 2005, 09:53 PM
    4. Replies: 37
      Last Post: January 19th 2004, 05:17 AM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •