Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Pastor Protection Bill derail

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
    I am still shocked that some in the Christian community think that ingesting massive quantities of BBQ is sinful! I think I'm going to quit Church.
    Isn't an official Baptist motto, "Till we eat again."?
    "The man from the yacht thought he was the first to find England; I thought I was the first to find Europe. I did try to found a heresy of my own; and when I had put the last touches to it, I discovered that it was orthodoxy."
    GK Chesterton; Orthodoxy

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Christianbookworm View Post
      Can I make a Modest Proposal joke?
      Sure, but I doubt he'd understand it.
      "The man from the yacht thought he was the first to find England; I thought I was the first to find Europe. I did try to found a heresy of my own; and when I had put the last touches to it, I discovered that it was orthodoxy."
      GK Chesterton; Orthodoxy

      Comment


      • Originally posted by MaxVel View Post
        it apparently was a complete and shocking surprise to Starlight, after all those years in churches, and studying the Bible, that there were some Christian who thought homosexual acts were sinful.
        No, no. Let's be clear: I knew there were some Christians who thought homosexual acts were sinful just as I knew there were some non-Christians who thought that homosexual acts were sinful. What came as a shock was finding out the relative proportions of Christians and non-Christians who were for and against the civil rights of gay people to marry.

        I had anticipated seeing overall Christian public support for equal rights for oppressed minorities, and Christians in general to be leading the campaigns for gay rights, with the non-Christians the ones who needed to be convinced. Instead the Christians were the ones publicly and actively trying to oppress the minority group and deny them equal rights...

        The issue was not seeing that different interpretations existed - I was already well aware of many different interpretations of the bible. The issue was realizing the relative frequency with which some of those different interpretations were held by various Christians world-wide and what they were prepared to do politically because of it.

        Interestingly though, this is something that appears to be in the process of changing rapidly. Already Christians in the West have reached a 50%-50% level of support for same-sex marriage, and the rapidness of the change leads me to believe that in about 10 years time the existence of same-sex marriage will be taken for granted in the vast majority of churches. It's still extremely disappointing however to see the Church being led by society on moral issues rather than the Church leading society, and serves only to confirm my view that modern society has advanced beyond the morality of Christianity, and that Christianity in our society is now serving to impede moral progress rather than inspiring it.
        "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
        "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
        "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Starlight View Post
          Interestingly though, this is something that appears to be in the process of changing rapidly. Already Christians in the West have reached a 50%-50% level of support for same-sex marriage, and the rapidness of the change leads me to believe that in about 10 years time the existence of same-sex marriage will be taken for granted in the vast majority of churches.
          The more a Church (or Christian) adheres to the Bible, the less accepting of unrepentant sin they will be. The more a Church (or Christian) drifts from the Bible, the more accepting of unrepentant sin they will be.

          It's still extremely disappointing however to see the Church being led by society on moral issues rather than the Church leading society,
          The reason for your claim (however valid it is) that more Christians are supporting homosexuality is because they are following society instead of the Bible.

          and serves only to confirm my view that modern society has advanced beyond the morality of Christianity, and that Christianity in our society is now serving to impede moral progress rather than inspiring it.
          Did somebody announce that today should be "Opposite Day", and I missed it?
          The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by lilpixieofterror View Post
            Sure, but I doubt he'd understand it.
            If young children and some animals having the same level of intelligence somehow makes it okay to kill babies, then why not eat them? Why let the meat go to waste? People eat calves and lambs. If human babies are at the same level...
            If it weren't for the Resurrection of Jesus, we'd all be in DEEP TROUBLE!

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Christianbookworm View Post
              If young children and some animals having the same level of intelligence somehow makes it okay to kill babies, then why not eat them?
              Too easy to catch diseases. You'd have to... AHEM!

              My reaction is the opposite. If chimps and dolphins are as intelligent as young children, then that could be a good argument to stop killing chimps and dolphins. (Wait, I think I can hear PETA screaming "That's what we've been saying, you chimp and dolphin murderers!!!")
              Middle-of-the-road swing voter. Feel free to sway my opinion.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Yttrium View Post
                Too easy to catch diseases. You'd have to... AHEM!

                My reaction is the opposite. If chimps and dolphins are as intelligent as young children, then that could be a good argument to stop killing chimps and dolphins. (Wait, I think I can hear PETA screaming "That's what we've been saying, you chimp and dolphin murderers!!!")
                Probably why the idea of eating apes is icky.
                If it weren't for the Resurrection of Jesus, we'd all be in DEEP TROUBLE!

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                  The more a Church (or Christian) adheres to the Bible, the less accepting of unrepentant sin they will be.
                  Indeed, there are two general types of approaches that religious people can have to moral issues: The letter, and the spirit.

                  The letter approach, which we can see exemplified in the behavior of the Pharisees generally involves condemning people and approaches an moral issues by finding the whatever is deemed to be the single most relevant verse in the religious text and apply that as a standard for condemnation. This approach is typically wedded to a divine-command theory of morality - where anything is moral or not moral simply because God says so, and therefore we have no way of knowing if any given thing is moral or not except by looking to see what God has told us about that specific thing. People who enjoy condemning others commonly find this view very attractive, as it allows them to construct a long list of things "God said" are wrong and go around condemning people who are in the wrong. People who are an entrenched part of any religious establishment also tend to be attracted to this sort of view.

                  The spirit approach, which see can see exemplified in Jesus and Paul, generally involves reasoning based on very abstract moral principles such as "love your neighbor". It is generally prepared to ignore the letter of the law on issues due to holding the general good of humanity to be more important. It is usually not associated with a divine-command view of morality, and may be associated instead with any other theory of objective moral. It potentially allows for quite revolutionary reasoning: To stop following the entire OT law, to overthrow the institution of slavery, etc. People who want a more permissive form of morality often find this kind of view attractive. Similarly those who seek a view of morality that has internal logical coherence, and which is not based on the potentially arbitrary whims of God as to what to prohibit or allow, will typically prefer this view. As will liberals and revolutionaries.

                  Both approaches are endorsed in various different parts of the bible. The OT levitical law, is of course, an example of the letter approach, where the commands of God are recorded as rules to be followed strictly. Whereas Jesus and Paul endorse a more reflective approach where abstract moral principles are held to be of central importance, and action in any given situation may contradict the recorded rules due to the abstract moral principles superseding the written rules.
                  "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
                  "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
                  "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Starlight View Post
                    Indeed, there are two general types of approaches that religious people can have to moral issues: The letter, and the spirit.
                    I'm not talking about religious people. I'm talking about people who believe the Bible is the Word of God.
                    The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Starlight View Post
                      It's still extremely disappointing however to see the Church not letting itself be being led by society on moral issues rather than the Society letting the Church leading society, and serves only to confirm my view that modern society has advanced beyond refused the morality of Christianity, and that Christianity in our society is now serving to impede immoral progress rather than letting the world inspire[strike]ing it[strike][b]Christianity into it's immorality .
                      Fixed it for you Starlight . You are upset because the church will not lead the world or let itself be lead into immorality.
                      Last edited by RumTumTugger; 04-28-2015, 07:43 PM.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                        I'm not talking about religious people. I'm talking about people who believe the Bible is the Word of God.
                        Yes, so am I. I'm saying that at a fundamental level your theory of morality and subsequent way of approaching the bible on moral subjects is completely wrong and not informed by the teachings of the bible.

                        You've approached the bible looking for a list of things to label sin, and sure enough the Bible is quite large includes many such lists. And so you feel like you're following the bible by using such lists. You get to feel religious and feel you're following God's word.

                        But you're not following the bible properly by doing such a thing. You've missed the fundamental point of New Testament morality: That that entire approach is the wrong approach. You're an OT Christian and the Pharisees would be proud of your religiosity.
                        "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
                        "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
                        "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Starlight View Post
                          Indeed, there are two general types of approaches that religious people can have to moral issues: The letter, and the spirit.
                          The problem here is that Paul condemns homosexual acts in his letters. He basically added a spirit side that reinforces the more ancient law. Otherwise, I suspect that many more Christians would be more accepting of homosexuality by now.

                          The spirit approach, which see can see exemplified in Jesus and Paul, generally involves reasoning based on very abstract moral principles such as "love your neighbor".
                          Note that the Golden Rule is actually a commandment from Jesus, making it effectively a "law" for Christians, to use the term loosely.
                          Middle-of-the-road swing voter. Feel free to sway my opinion.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Starlight View Post
                            Yes, so am I. I'm saying that at a fundamental level your theory of morality and subsequent way of approaching the bible on moral subjects is completely wrong and not informed by the teachings of the bible.

                            You've approached the bible looking for a list of things to label sin, and sure enough the Bible is quite large includes many such lists. And so you feel like you're following the bible by using such lists. You get to feel religious and feel you're following God's word.

                            But you're not following the bible properly by doing such a thing. You've missed the fundamental point of New Testament morality: That that entire approach is the wrong approach. You're an OT Christian and the Pharisees would be proud of your religiosity.
                            Yup - it's Opposite Day!
                            The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Yttrium View Post
                              The problem here is that Paul condemns homosexual acts in his letters.
                              That's debatable.

                              However, Paul also takes slavery for granted in his letters. Nowhere did he call for Christians to abolish the institution of slavery, but rather simply asked them to treat their slaves kindly. Yet when we read today his words that in Christ there is no longer Jew or Gentile, slave nor free, male nor female, we can see in them certain ideals that were not necessarily recognized by Paul himself. The germ of the idea of the end of slavery is in those words, but not explicitly advocated by him. Likewise the germ of the idea of the end of discrimination between the sexes, and similarly of equality for gay people, is in those words, but not explicitly advocated by him.

                              Part of the beauty of abstract moral principles is that the person who enunciates them may not themselves understand the full implications of them, and later generations through reflection on them can work toward a better world.

                              This is how being anti-slavery can be the correct Christian position even though the biblical law institutes slavery and never once calls for its abolition: Because the underlying principles of love which Christians are called to use, when drawn out to their logical end, are in flat contradiction to the existence of the institution of slavery and serve to override the letter of the biblical law accordingly.
                              Last edited by Starlight; 04-28-2015, 07:58 PM.
                              "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
                              "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
                              "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Starlight View Post
                                That's debatable.

                                However, Paul also takes slavery for granted in his letters.
                                A WHOLE different concept than the slavery we know.
                                The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                                Comment

                                Related Threads

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by little_monkey, Yesterday, 04:19 PM
                                12 responses
                                66 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post JimL
                                by JimL
                                 
                                Started by whag, 03-26-2024, 04:38 PM
                                52 responses
                                256 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Mountain Man  
                                Started by rogue06, 03-26-2024, 11:45 AM
                                25 responses
                                108 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post rogue06
                                by rogue06
                                 
                                Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 09:21 AM
                                33 responses
                                194 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Roy
                                by Roy
                                 
                                Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 08:34 AM
                                82 responses
                                338 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Ronson
                                by Ronson
                                 
                                Working...
                                X