Announcement

Collapse

Christianity 201 Guidelines

See more
See less

Questions about manuscript evidence

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Omniskeptical View Post
    Edited by a Moderator
    Yes, it was clearly translated that way to support atheists.
    Last edited by Bill the Cat; 05-17-2015, 10:40 AM.

    Comment


    • #47
      I am not a KJV Onlyist. First, my question in the OP were honest and it was answered in the manner that it was posted by others.

      Second, I was only expressing how I feel about the NIV. Someone needed an explanation so I brought up the Duet 22:28-29 passage.

      I didn't realized it after you guys admitted the passage was a mistranslation, and now you guys started accusing me of KJV Onylist which I am not.

      But hey, surprised it went both way ain't it?
      Yeng Vg

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by AkByR64 View Post
        I am not a KJV Onlyist. First, my question in the OP were honest and it was answered in the manner that it was posted by others.

        Second, I was only expressing how I feel about the NIV. Someone needed an explanation so I brought up the Duet 22:28-29 passage.

        I didn't realized it after you guys admitted the passage was a mistranslation, and now you guys started accusing me of KJV Onylist which I am not.

        But hey, surprised it went both way ain't it?
        Because the ones usually attacking the NIV as "liberal" are KJV-Onlyists who are entirely ignorant of the process of translation.
        The fact that science cannot make any pronouncement about ethical principles has been misinterpreted as indicating that there are no such principles; while in fact the search for truth presupposes ethics. - Karl Popper, 1987

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Dante View Post
          Because the ones usually attacking the NIV as "liberal" are KJV-Onlyists who are entirely ignorant of the process of translation.
          And we've had a few KJVO types who were also geocentricists.
          Be watchful, stand firm in the faith, act like men, be strong.
          1 Corinthians 16:13

          "...he [Doherty] is no historian and he is not even conversant with the historical discussions of the very matters he wants to pontificate on."
          -Ben Witherington III

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by AkByR64 View Post
            I am not a KJV Onlyist.
            Ok. I apologize for the accusation.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Dante View Post
              Because the ones usually attacking the NIV as "liberal" are KJV-Onlyists who are entirely ignorant of the process of translation.
              I get as many translations as I can and go back to the Hebrew Lexicon to study it out for myself. I don't just rely on the KJV. I like it, but it's not the only one.
              Yeng Vg

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Raphael View Post
                And we've had a few KJVO types who were also geocentricists.
                I see. I am a advocate of Geo. I believe the bible taught it.
                Yeng Vg

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by AkByR64 View Post
                  I get as many translations as I can and go back to the Hebrew Lexicon to study it out for myself. I don't just rely on the KJV. I like it, but it's not the only one.
                  The NIV is still comparatively superior to the KJV in terms of translation.

                  Originally posted by AkByR64 View Post
                  I see. I am a advocate of Geo. I believe the bible taught it.
                  As a Christian, I must reject such a claim.
                  The fact that science cannot make any pronouncement about ethical principles has been misinterpreted as indicating that there are no such principles; while in fact the search for truth presupposes ethics. - Karl Popper, 1987

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    One can reasonably attack the NIV as being a worse translation than usual (all translations having disadvantages of one sort or another). E.g. N T Wright has said that anyone using the NIV will never understand Paul. There are other problems as well. But accusing it of being "liberal" is typically a KJV-only charge. That why people assumed you were KJV only.

                    Comment

                    Related Threads

                    Collapse

                    Topics Statistics Last Post
                    Started by Thoughtful Monk, 04-14-2024, 04:34 PM
                    5 responses
                    51 views
                    0 likes
                    Last Post Thoughtful Monk  
                    Started by One Bad Pig, 04-10-2024, 12:35 PM
                    0 responses
                    28 views
                    1 like
                    Last Post One Bad Pig  
                    Started by NorrinRadd, 04-13-2022, 12:54 AM
                    45 responses
                    343 views
                    0 likes
                    Last Post NorrinRadd  
                    Started by Zymologist, 07-09-2019, 01:18 PM
                    369 responses
                    17,370 views
                    0 likes
                    Last Post NorrinRadd  
                    Working...
                    X