The Antichrist Legend
Continued from prior post↑
From The Antichrist Legend: A Chapter in Christian and Jewish Folklore (1895), by Wilhelm Bousset (page 114):
To be continued...
Continued from prior post↑
From The Antichrist Legend: A Chapter in Christian and Jewish Folklore (1895), by Wilhelm Bousset (page 114):
Altogether Meyer seems to me to have gone much too far in his attempt to establish direct Christian influences in the Edda. He greatly underrates the primeval mythological stuff contained in these lays. Take, for instance, what is told in Völuspá (3) of the giant Ymir and of Chaos, and in Vaf-drűonismâl (21) of the creation of the universe. It is a great mistake to derive these primitive myths from a passage in Honorius, where all analogy completely breaks down. According to Honorius the body of (the first) man is formed from the several elements of the earth. From this Meyer argues that the creation myth of the Edda has been evolved by a kind of reverse process! Equally strained and wide of the mark seems Meyer's attempt to derive from Revelation the magnificent description of the five battles of the gods, with which the end of the world is introduced (Völuspá), strophes 50 et seq.). With what an effort the required number five is here obtained by the expedient of tacking on Hades and Death to the three hostile powers, the Beast, the Dragon, and the False Prophet [θηρίον, δρακών, ψευδοπροφήτης]! Nor does Meyer seem to me to establish with his vague parallelisms the identity of Súrtr (strophe 51) with the Antichrist (p. 206). To my mind primeval myths stand in the background of the descriptions of the gods, as well as in the accounts of the two monsters, the Midgard Serpent and Fenris the Wolf.
To be continued...
Comment